
Citation 
 Permanent Link:
 http://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00000383/00186
Material Information
 Title:
 Chemical engineering education
 Alternate Title:
 CEE
 Abbreviated Title:
 Chem. eng. educ.
 Creator:
 American Society for Engineering Education  Chemical Engineering Division
 Place of Publication:
 Storrs, Conn
 Publisher:
 Chemical Engineering Division, American Society for Engineering Education
 Publication Date:
 December 1965
 Frequency:
 Quarterly[1962]
Annual[ FORMER 19601961]
 Language:
 English
 Physical Description:
 v. : ill. ; 2228 cm.
Subjects
 Subjects / Keywords:
 Chemical engineering  Study and teaching  Periodicals ( lcsh )
Notes
 Citation/Reference:
 Chemical abstracts
 Additional Physical Form:
 Also issued online.
 Dates or Sequential Designation:
 1960June 1964 ; v. 1, no. 1 (Oct. 1965)
 Numbering Peculiarities:
 Publication suspended briefly: issue designated v. 1, no. 4 (June 1966) published Nov. 1967.
 General Note:
 Title from cover.
 General Note:
 Place of publication varies: Rochester, N.Y., 19651967; Gainesville, Fla., 1968
Record Information
 Source Institution:
 University of Florida
 Rights Management:
 All applicable rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
 Resource Identifier:
 01151209 ( OCLC )
70013732 ( LCCN ) 00092479 ( ISSN )
 Classification:
 TP165 .C18 ( lcc )
660/.2/071 ( ddc )

Downloads 
This item has the following downloads:

Full Text 
THE
JOURNAL
CHEMI
CAL
ENGINEERING
EDUCATION
Volume
Number
December 1965
OF
THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION
Volume 3, Number 2, December 1965
Editor: Robert Lemlich
Associate Editor: Daniel Hershey
Editorial 2
Estimation of Random Error in a Derived Quantity 
D. A. Ratkowsky 3
Approach to SteadyState of a Two Stage MixerSettler
Extractor James E. Halligan and Morton Smutz 11
A Projects Laboratory for Junior Chemical Engineers 
Sami Atallah 17
Undergraduate Use of Analog Computers W. E.
Schiesser 22
Departmentalized Curriculum Based on Chemical Change
 William H. Corcoran 32
A Common Studies Curriculum in Engineering Eric
Weger 43
The Undergraduate Curriculum in Chemical Engineering
at Yale Charles A. Walker and John A. Tallmadge 48
Miscellany:
Solution to Previous Problem 53
Translation of Titles 55
The Journal of Chemical Engineering Education is pub
lished at irregular intervals at the University of Cincinnati,
Cincinnati 21, Ohio, U.S.A. Opinions expressed by contribu
tors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of
the editor or the University. Annual subscription: In the
U.S.A. and Canada, $2.00; elsewhere, $3.00. Prepayment is
requested.
WE BOW OUT
As we indicated in our previous issue, this journal
has been suffering from an unusual malady  a shortage of
publishable material. We have subscribers but we lack a
sufficient number of contributors. As a result our issues
have become too few and far between. Accordingly, we have
regretfully decided to suspend publication.
We do however want to take this final opportunity to
thank our subscribers and contributors, our colleagues and
friends, and our typists and mimeographers for their sup
port, encouragement, and assistance.
It is our understanding that the Chemical Engineering
Division of the American Society for Engineering Education
is presently taking steps to revitalize their divisional
publication. We wish them success in this endeavor and
urge all our readers to support their efforts.
R. L.
ESTIMATION OF RANDOM ERROR IN A DERIVED QUANTITY
D. A. Ratkowsky
Assistant Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering
The University of British Columbia
Vancouver 8, Canada

Abstract: The statistical method for determining the
variance of an arbitrary function of experimentally measured
variables deserves to be more generally employed in under
graduate laboratory courses to assist the student in evalua
ting the errors in, and the reliability of,.experimental data.
The statistical method also has an important use in explora
tory research studies and in process design. In all cases
the method leads to an estimate of the probable error in the
derived quantity, whereas an alternative method gives the
maximum possible error, which generally represents an overly
conservative estimate of the error.

The statistical theory of random errors in a quantity
which is derived from primary experimental observations, is
useful for the estimation of error in at least three classes
of problems:
1) The analysis of experimental error, either in research
or in undergraduate student laboratory classes,
2) Exploratory research studies, to ascertain whether
the method of measuring a particular variable is of
sufficient precision, and
.3) Process design, where experimental error creates an
uncertainty in the magnitude of the quantity to be
designed.
The statistical method for determining the variance of
an arbitrary function of experimentally measured variables
is given in several textbooks (1, 2, 3, 4) which, although
not mentioning chemical engineering specifically in their
titles, may come to the attention of chemical engineers.
There are, however, at least two leading textbooks, both of
which are specifically concerned with applications of mathe
matical methods to chemical engineering, which do not mention
the statistical method. This statistical method, which en
ables one to construct confidence intervals for the mean
value of the derived quantity, deserves to be better known
by teachers of chemical engineering, and more generally em
ployed in undergraduate laboratory courses, to assist in e
valuating the reliability of the experimental data.
Before presenting the statistical method, it is useful
to first present an alternative method of determining the
propagated error. This method, given in several textbooks
(5, 6) has the weakness that the error it predicts is the
maximum possible error, and takes no account of the possi
bility of compensating or cancelling errors. It is based
upon the fact that if
U = 0 (xi, x ....... xn) (1)
where x1, x2, ......., x are several directly measured vari
ables subject to experimental error, then the differential
change in the derived quantity U for a differential change
in each of the measured x's is
S x + ) X + ...... +xn dx (2)
If the errors dxl, dx2, ......., dxn are relatively
small, (so that the terms of higher order in the Taylor ex
pansion are negligible), then Equation 2 can be reduced to
U = Ax, + 2 + .... + (3)
Illustrative examples of the use of this formula are
given in reference (5), pp. 5556 and reference (6), pp. 359
360. One important aspect of the use of Equation 3 is that
the sign of the partial derivative is so chosen that all
terms of Equation 3 have the same sign, that is, the terms
add up in such a way that AU represents the maximum possible
error in the derived variable U. Equation 3 almost certainly
overestimates the error involved in the derived quantity, be
cause it considers only the simultaneous occurrence of the
most extreme errors and takes no account of the possibility
of compensating errors. The probability of operating at the
most extreme level of error is always small, and becomes van
ishingly small as one increases the number of primary vari
ables subject to error. The concept of maximum possible error
is therefore one of limited usefulness.
Statistical techniques lead to a more pertinent measure
of the error in a derived quantity by enabling one to calcu
late the variance of the mean value of the derived quantity.
The formula to be used is shown below.
If Z = f(xi, x2,.X .., x ) where the x. are indepen
dent random variables with finite means and finite variances,
then if. the errorsifn the x. are not too large (so that the
higher order terms of the Taylor expansion can be neglected),
then one can write
2 (,f \2 2 f 2 +(4)
S) + /x* ++ ......2 .2 (4)
The partial derivative of the function f with respect to each
x. is taken with all the remaining x's held constant. The
quantities 6 2' a 2 a 2 represent the variances of
Xu x2 x.:
the respective primary variables xi, x2, ...., x Practical
application of Equation 4 de eds, upon one's ability to de
termine these variances. The variances are usually determined
from random experimental measurements upon the individual var
iables. Suppose, for example, that in an experiment to de
termine the flow rate through a pipe, 5 successive weighing
of the effluent from the pipe during the saie fixed time in
terval gave values of 97, 102, 99, 104, and 98 pounds respec
tively. The mean value of the five readings is xj = 100 lbs.
and the best estimate of the variance is ,2 = i3(xi x)2/
(n 1) = 8.5. This, together with similar estimates from
random samples of the other variables, provide the various
variances 2 rx 2 s o 2 to be used in Equation 4.
x x2 Xn
Sometimes a reading of a particular quantity on an in
strument or measuring device is very steady, but the limiting
factor to the precision of the reading is the smallest scale
division available on the instrument. Utilizing thexfact
that practically all of the area (actually 99.73),unsder the
curve of the normal (Gaussian) distribution is contained with
in 3 standard deviations of the mean, then one can consider
36 to be synonymous with the range, and thus from. a manow
ledge or a guess of the range, it is possibleto'obtain a
reasonable estimate of the standard deviation. Consider a
temperature measurement made with a thermometer ~i'n which the
smallest scale division is'loC. It seems" reasonable, to as
sume that the maximum error range obtainable (due'to human
reading error alone) is about 0.50C (or 0.250C). Thus an
estimate of o would be 0.25 = 0.0833 from which 2 = 0.007.
3 
Of course, the range may be considerably greater than 0.50C,
due to large fluctuations or instabilities in the temperature.
Here, one would once again require experimentation to obtain
a random sample from which the variance may be estimated.
The previous discussion applies only to steady readings where
the smallest scale division imposes a limiting factor on the
accuracy of the reading.
A special case of Equation 4 occurs when the functional
relation is of the form Z = cxat xa2 ....... x an, where c,
a1, a2, ......, an are constants. Then it is easy to show,
by using Equation 4, that
2 a a 2 + a2 2+ ". + a (5)
X,)n XnX
Presented below are two illustrative problems which will
indicate the uses to which Equation 4 can be put.
Illustr native Example It
Consider an undergraduate laboratory experiment on the
unsteadystate heating of water, starting at room temperature,
in a steamjacketted open kettle. The apparent overall heat
transfer coefficient is given by
Mc
U P dt
a AAt dO
a
where
M = weight of water, lb.
c = heat capacity of water, BTU/lb (OF)
A = area of kettle in contact with water through
which heat transfer can take place, ft2
Ata = apparent temperature difference between steam
and water at any instant, OF
dt/dQ = slope, at any instant, of the curve of water
temperature versus time.
Suppose it is desired tho. determine the value of U and
its precision, at the condition when At = 600F.
a
Since this equation is an example of the special case
quoted above, the expression for the variance of U obtained
with the aid of Equation 5, is
S M +k )2 + + (/+ t
T_: 200 lbs. of water were measured out in 25 lb.
batches. Each batch was.weighed within maximum
error limits of 0.25 lb., i.e. m = 25 0.25 lb.
FL 0.251
Therefore 0 =  = 0.083 or let & = 0.10
m 3 m
lb. to take into account the loss of water due to
splashing or retention of water in the bucket, etc.,
when transfer to the kettle is being made.
M = mi + mn + ....... + m8
2 = 8' 12 = 0.08 lb2, since the variance
of a sum is the sum of the individual variances.
d : The heat capacity of water is so well known that
OP one can assume that there is no uncertainty in the
knowledge of cp, i.e., a)C 2 = 0.
61: As heating continues, expansion of the water takes
place, causing the wetted area to increase. How
ever, the term "apparent.heattransfer coefficient"
implies in fact that this increase in area has been
ignored in favor of using the wetted area at room
temperature. From measurement of the liquid depth,
and a knowledge of the geometry of the kettle, it
is estimated that A = 8.74 ft2 with a maximum un
certainty of 0.45 ft2.
I" 0.45
Therefore 0.15 ft2
A 3
2 = 0.0225 ft2
A
6 : The temperature difference ta = t tw, where ts
a and tw are the steam and water temperatures, respec
tively. The temperature of the steam, assumed to
be saturated steam,.was determined from the steam
pressure which was measured using a mercury mano
meter. The pressure variations were kept within
the maximum error limits of 1 inch Hg, i.e.,
0.5 p.s.i., about a set value of 5 p.s.i.g. The
steam temperature therefore varied between maximum
limits of 1.50F.
Therefore 1.5 = 0.5 2 = 0.25(OF)2
0 3 ; "
The water temperature walsmeasured by using the
average value of two thermocouples, each thermocou
ple indicating between error limits of 0.50F.
t = (1/2)(tw + t)
t 2 = (1/4)(ar 2 + 6(t 2)= (2/4)(05)2
wi W2
= 0.0138 (OF)2
Therefore t 2 = 0.25 + 0.01 = 0.26 (OF)2
a
Odt/dQ: The derivative of temperature with respect to time
at the particular time 0 where At = 60F was deter
mined from the tangent drawn to aaplot of water tem
perature versus time. From several trials, consid
ering the various possibilities for drawing a smooth
curve through the points, and considering the preci
sion of drawing a tangent to a curve, a reasonable
estimate for the derivative dt/dG was 3.0 OF/min
with variance.
adt/dG2 = 0.048 (OF/min)2
The average value of the apparent overall heat transfer
coefficient, Ua, is obtained to be
Ua = 2() (60 = 68.6 BTU/(hr)(ft2)(oF)
and the estimated variance to be
S2 = (6 )2 0.08 0.0225 0.26 0.048
a 68.6 (200) + (8.74)2 (60) + '(30)
= (68.6)2[2 x 106 + 2.95 x 104 + 7.22x105 +0.00533]
= (4706)(0.00570) = 26.82
au = 5.18
a
Using this value of the standard deviation of U 95%
confidence limits upon U can be constructed. The limits are
1.96 (5.18) = 10.2, the value 1.96 being taken from a tabu
lation of the normal distribution function.
Thus U a= 68.6 t 10.2 BTU/hr(ft2)(OF), where 10.2 has
the significance of being 95%/ confidence limits about the
mean value 68.6.
The above illustration also shows how Equation 4 can be
useful in exploratory research studies, to help the researcher
decide if a particular measurement is of sufficient precision.
It is seen that by far the biggest contributor to the overall
experimental error is that due to dt/dQ, the contribution be
ing 0.00533/0.00570 = 93.5%0. Hence, if the purpose of the
research project is to determine U then it is of paramount
importance to establish the temperature vs. time curve accur
ately, and also to increase the precision in taking the de
rivative at a particular point on that curve.
The third use of Equation 4 is in process design. Due to
uncertainties in the measured value of certain primary experi
mental observations, there is going to be an uncertainty in
the derived quantity. Since it is necessary that the unit be
ing designed be adequate for its task, this uncertainty must
be allowed for in the design. Use of the concept of maximum
possible error results in an overly conservative design. How
ever, by using the statistical theory of random error, quan
titatively described by Equation 4, one can base the design
upon, say, the 95%0 confidence limit of the derived quantity.
This will practically always result in an adequate design
without being overly conservative.
Illustrative Example 2:
A countercurrent doublepipe heat exchanger is to be de
signed to heat 50,000 lb/hr of a liquid from 80 to 1500F.
The specific heat of the liquid is not precisely known but
its mean value can be taken to be cp = 0.85 with . = 0.04
BTU/lb(F). The overall heat transfer coefficient, U, is es
timated to be 73 BTU/hr(ft2)(OF) with a = 4. The heating
medium is a liquid of precisely known c which enters at
1800F and leaves at 1200F. Determine tRe required area of the
heat exchanger.
A =e (t2 t) 50,000(0.85)(70)
UAt1 73(34.8) 1170 ft2
UAt 73) (34 )
6" ='A(0.00522)/2' 1170(0.0722) = 84.5 ft2
If we wish to be 950/ confident that the exchanger will
have adequate area (aWctually the value calculated will repre
sent 97.50/ confidence, since in fact a onetailed test is
being considered), then the design areas should be
A = 1170 + 1.96(84.5) = 1340 ft2
Had the concept of maximum possible error been used in
stead, the design area would have been in the vicinity of
1530 ft2.
Literature Cited:
1. Volk, W., "Applied Statistics for Engineers" McGraw
Hill (1958)
2. Davies, 0. L., Editor, "Statistical Methods in Research
and Production" Oliver and Boyd (1957)
3. Parratt, L. G., "Probability and Experimental Errors in
Science", Wiley (1961)
4. Paradine, C. G. and Rivett, B. H. P., "Statistical Me
thods for Technologists", English U. Press (1960)
5. Mickey, H. S., Sherwood, T. K., and Reed, C. E., "Ap
lied Mathematics in Chemical Engineering", McGrawHill
(1957)
6. Jenson, V. G. and Jeffreys, G. V., "Mathematical Methods
in Chemical Engineering" Academic Press (1963)
APPROACH TO STEADYSTATE OF A TWO STAGE
MIXERSETTLER EXTRACTOR*
James E. Halligan, Graduate Assistant,and
Morton Smutz, Deputy Director
Institute for Atomic Research and Department of
Chemical Engineering, Iowa State University
Ames, Iowa
Abstract: Under the assumptions of ideal stage behavior,
immiscible solvents, constant flow rates, constant intdrf'ace
levels, constant distribution coefficients, instantaneous mass
transfer and homogeneous phases, it is possible to solve the
appropriate differential equations simultaneously ak 4expre.ss.
the rate of approach of a mixersettler extractor to steady
state as a function of a dimensionless quantityLthat involves
the elapsed time and a quantity related to the system capa
citance. The particular integral, or steadystate solution,
is the familiar equation for the concentration of a solute in
a stream as a function of the socalled extraction factor.
By introducing solvent extraction theory in this manner, the
student develops a better understanding of the dynamics of the
system and the realization that the steadystate solution is
only a somewhat idealized special case of the general solution.
 I  ,, ,,,,, 
The Differential Equations:.,. ..
Figure 1 shows a continuous countercurrent two stage
mixersettler extractor with the light solvent L entering
from the left and the heavy solvent H with solute entering
from the right. Each box represents an ideal stage made up
of a mixer where the two phases are contacted and a settler
where the two phases are allowed to separate. There are many
commercial types of extractors that are designed in this
way (1).
Equations 1 and 2 are solute balances made for each stage
expressing the rate of accumulation of solute as a function
of the rate of solute flowing into and out of the stage.
* Contribution No. 1445; work was performed in the Ames
Laboratory of the U. S. Atomic Energy Commission.
d(VHx, + VLY,)
dt = Loo + H2x2 LY HxI (1)
.d(VHx2 + VLy)
dt = Liy1 + HFXF L2x2 H2x2 (2)
If the flow rates are assumed constant (L = L2 = L and
H = H2 = H), the distribution coefficient m is assumed con
stant, and the entering solvent contains no solute, Equation
la and 2a result. The term G is defined as
VH + VLm
S as will be discussed later.
dxj + (1 + E)x x (a)
dt G G: 
dx2 (1 + E)x2 Ex (2a
t G G G + (2a)
Solution of the Equations:
The simultaneous solution of Equations la and 2a provides
a good algebraic workout and results in Equation 3 for a
stepwise change in x at t = 0. Such a stepwise change may
be thought of as suddenly switching from a solutefree aque
ous stream to an aqueous feed stream after the extractor has
reached a hydraulic balance with no solute in the system.
d2 x 2(1 + E) dxi r1 + E + E2 x
dt+ G dt + Ux (3)
By inspection one can see the steadystate solution be
cause 2X and a will both equal zero. This expression
dt dt
can be verified independently by making steadystate material
balances about the two stages and solving simultaneously.
xF
(X')SS = + E + E (4)
The complementary function can be found by setting the
differential equation equal to zero and solving the resulting
equation.
STAGE I
VL
VH
Ly
HX2
Figure I
STAGE 2
VHL
VH
2.0
Z=t/G
Figure 2
Lyo
HXI
Ly2
HXF
L.
+ _
X ,
I II I D
SIII III III
______________ 0 .0 0
(l+EE )t (l+E+E )t
(x=)CF = CGe G + C2e (.)
The complete solution for xi is the sum of the expres
sions in Equations 4 and 5. Boundary conditions assumed,were
that t = 0, xi = 0, and dxl/dt = 0. After considerable alge
bra, Equation 6 appears.
(l+EE)t
xF (1 + E + E+)e G
(x)t 1 + E + E 2E
2E12
If both sides of Equation 6 ar'e divided by the steady
state value of xi, the fractional approach to steadystate Y
can.. be determined as a function of E, G and t.
(1+EEjt (l+E+E
 (x,)+. 1 (1 + E + E)e G (1+EE )e GE
(xssa 2E*' S ih 2E
Significance of G:
Figure 2 shows the solution to Equation 7 as a function
of the dimensionless quantity, Z(Z = t/G) with parameters of E.
The significance of G can be seen by multiplying the nu
merator and denominator of the defining equation by x .
VH + VLm VHi + VLYi (8)
G = =. (8)
H RX i
The numerator represents the amount of solute in stage i at
a given time and the denominator is the amount leaving stage
i per unit time in the aqueous stream. In other words, if
the numerator is relatively large due to large volumes and a
high distribution coefficient, and if the aqueous flow rate
is relatively small, then g~Liich is related to the system
capacitance, will also be large. The fractional approach to
steadystate at a given value of E depends on the ratio of t
to G, as shown in Figure 2.
Sample Prpblem: .
Suppose that one desires to know the fractional approach
to steadystate under the following conditions, choosing any
consistent units for the Variables.
t=l VH =1
L=l VL =
H= m=l
For these conditions, E = 1, G = 2 and Z = 0.5. Figure 2
shows that Y would be 20%/o of its final steadystate value
after t = 1. If, however, VH and VL were each equal to 0.25
instead of unity, Z would equal 2. Figure 2 shows that I
would equal 80% in this case at t = 1.
Discussion:
The same technique has been used to develop similar ex
pressions for three, four, five and six stage mixersettlers.
These solutions are no more complicated than those described
in this paper but there is considerably more algebra to do.
Equation la and 2a can be solved simultaneously for x,
as a function of time, using the analog computer wiring dia
gram shown in Figure 3, but it is not as much fun and the
students learn more electronics and use less of their rusty
sophomore mathematics.
Literature Cited:
1. Treybal, R. E., "Liquid Extraction", McGrawHill, (1963).
A PROJECTS LABORATORY FOR JUNIOR .CHEMICAL ENGINEERS*
Sami Atallah
Associate Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering
Tufts University
Medford, Massachusetts
 
Abstract: This paper describes the operation of an under
graduate chemical engineering laboratory which is in addition
to the usual unit operations laboratory but is not a substitute
for a research thesis. Small groups of students are assigned
different interesting projects and they are required to search
the literature, build apparatus, keep a record of their labor
atory activities, and present oral and written reports. This
laboratory achieves several objectives but best of all, it
provides an outlet for the students' creativity and talents.
     
If God were to prepare an addendum to his ten command
ments, this addendum being intended for graduating en
gineers in general and chemical engineers in particular,
it would probably read something like this:
Thou shalt be well founded in the basic fields of
mathematics, physics and Femistry but
Thou shalt perform engineering work and not be a
pure scientist.
Thou shalt be creative.
Thou shalt have the basic tools to tackle a new
problem and be able to solve it.
Thou shalt have the ability to enlist the help of
others who art more knowledgeable than thou art.
Thou shalt have the ability to use other sources and
devices such as a library or a computer and if
thou shalt find no help, then thou shouldst
Presented at the A.I.Ch.E. annual meeting in Boston, Decem
ber 1964. Publication release was obtained by the author.
proceed on thine own initiative with confidence
in thyself, and when thou findest a solution,
thou shalt be able to communicate either orally
or in writing whatever thou hast found to thy
colleagues, supervisors and the public.
According to Mayer (1) and Moulton (2), the chemical in
dustry would say "Amen" to this addendum, and "Hallelujah" if
the word "economically" were added to these commandments. And
in this spirit, about five years ago, the "Projects Laboratory"
was introduced in the normal junior year unit operations course
sequence. It had the following objectives:
1. To provide an outlet for the student's creativity and
talents.
2. To show the student that textbooks are not all there
is to know and thus teach him to use the library and
to search the technical literature.
3. To teach the student the methodology of conducting
an organized experimental study.
4. To familiarize the student with the basic machine
shop practices.
5. To encourage good oral and written presentations.
6. To show the wide variety of interesting problems that
a chemical engineer can get involved with because of
his versatile wide background.
Before presenting the mechanism and mode of operation of
this laboratory and the types of projects pursued, it would
be interesting to show where this laboratory falls in our four
year undergraduate curriculum at Tufts University.
In order to graduate from Tufts, an engineering student
must satisfy the requirements in forty courses of three or
four credit hours each. This requires the average student to
carry five courses each term.
The Freshman year is the same for all engineers. They
take two semesters of chemistry, physics, mathematics, graphics,
and English.
Only students desiring to continue in chemical engineer
ing must make up their minds at the end of the first.year ....
During the sophomore year a student takes two semesters of
physical chemistry, electric circuits., mathematics, two elec
tives in the humanities or social studies, a third semester
of physics and his first course in .chemical engihebring stoi
chiometry.
The Junior and Senior year programs are shown below:
Junior Year
*Unit Operations I 4 *Unit Operations II 4
*Thermodynamics I 3 *Thermodynamics II 3
Organic .Chemistry 4 Chem. Analysis 4
Applied Mechanics 3 Applied Mechanics 4
Hum. or Soc. Study 3 Hum. or Soc. Study 3
Senior Year
*Chem. Eng. Lab. 3 *Chemical Technology 3
Technical Elective. 3 *Plant Design 4
Hum. or Soc. Study 6 Hum. or Soc. Study 6
Free Elective 3 Elective 3
The first projects laboratory is given during the first
term of the junior year as part of the unit operations course.
It is held one afternoon a week. These afternoons are not,
solely devoted to laboratory work. Two afternoons are devoted
to applied mathematics in chemical engineering. Our students
at that point seem to be weak in loglog plotting, graphical
integration, trial and error solutions and slide rule manipu
lations. An afternoon is devoted to a lecture on the chemical
engineering literature and report preparation. Mimeographed
notes on the literature and sample long form reports (thesis
type) are distributed at that time. Another afternoon is de
voted to machine shop practice. Occasionally a plant trip or
film may be scheduled. About eight afternoons are spent on
the project.
During the second term, students perform six experiments
in unit operations based on what they have learned during the
first term. These experiments are: distillation, extraction,
fluid flow, insulation testing, heat exchangers and boiling.
During the first semester of the senior year, a student
is given the choice of either doing a B.S. thesis (if he
qualifies with a C+ or better average) or taking the regular
chemical engineering laboratory course. This laboratory
course consists of six weeks of standard experiments in unit
operations i{humidification, drying, evaporation, filtration?
Dorrith.icener and flooding of packed beds). The remainder.
of the coursee is devoted to more sophisticated group projects.
In addition, the students are required to read early in the
term a major portion of Wilson's "Introduction to Scientific
Research" McGraw Hill, paperback edition, and they are quiz
zed on it periodically and are expected to use what they learn
Courses taught by the department.
from it in their projects.
Operation of the Projects Laboratory:
In general, the laboratory is conducted in the following
manner. The class is divided into 'groups of two and the pro
jects are assigned to or chosen by these groups. Within
three or four weeks a literature survey is made and a written
theoretical report is prepared by the group. In addition,
one member of the group presents it orally to the class in
810 minutes. He is graded by his classmates on: Clarity,
knowledge of the subject, information transfer, extemporane
ousness, diction and poise. The judging sheets with class
comments are returned to the speaker. Th group then spends
the remainder of the term building an apparatus, running ex
periments, obtaining data and correlating results. A final
group report (of the thesis type) is handed in at the end of
the term at which time the second member of the group presents
orally the experimental findings and is judged by the class.
Typical Projects:
The following is a list of projects recently assigned to
juniors:
1. Gas Bubbles in Liquids. Study the effect of inlet
conditions on the rate and size of bubbles of air in
water.
2. Recovery of Chemicals from the Lunar Crust. Attempt
to recover the water of crystallization of ores con
sidered to be on the lunar surface.
3. Rocket Fuel Performance. The performance of a hobby
rocket solid fuel is studied in static firings.
Specific impulse, total impulse, average thrust,
mass ratio, etc., are to be found.
4. Desalination with Solar Energy. Construct a flat
collector and test its efficiency.
In all these projects, the underlined portion was the
title of the initial (theoretical) report. A diagram of the
proposed apparatus was prepared and checked by the instructor
and machinist for feasibility and economy of construction.
Generally, the students assembled the apparatus themselves.
Each group was required to maintain a laboratory data book
which was checked occasionally. The groups met often with
the instructor and sought help from the faculty of other de
partments.
As one can see from the titles of these projects, they
are not equivalent to research theses. They do not contri
bute new information to human knowledge (although the author
must confess that he and other faculty members have occasion
ally used the projects laboratory to test a few research
ideas) but they leave the student with the impression that
he is doing research.
There was no problem in searching for project topics.
Summers spent in an industrial research laboratory, technical
journals, books, other faculty members and the instructor's
current research interests have been the usual sources of ideas.
The students' reaction has been gratifying. In a ques
tionaire given at the end of the first year that we started
this laboratory, all students indicated that it should be con
tinued. Some felt that they needed more time. Many worked
after hours and during vacations. We feel that the projects
laboratory encouraged qualified students to choose a B.S.
thesis during the senior year and to do a better job on it.
We feel that it has contributed to the increase in the number
of our students going on to do graduate work (43%/ over'the
past five years) and in general we are sure that this lahora
tory has made better chemical engineers out of our students.
Literature Cited:
1. Mayer, M. W.. "Industries' Views of Current Chemical En
fineering Education", paper delivered at the A.S.E.E.
annual meeting, June 1963
2. houlton, R. W., The Trend, 16:No. 4, 4, (Oct. 6, 1964)
UNDERGRADUATE USE OF ANALOG COMPUTERS*
V. E. Schiesser
Associate Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering
Lehigh University
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania
Abstract: Types of problems that can be solved by under
graduates employing analog computers are examined.
Introduction:
The availability of small electronic analog computers
for use by relatively large numbers of students has brought
about significant changes in undergraduate education in the
Department of Chemical Engineering, Lehigh University. This
paper is a brief account of our experiences in the use of
analog computers in undergraduate education during the last
five years.
Operating Procedure:
Our experience with analog computation.began in 1960
with the purchase of an Electronic Associates, Inc. TR10 20
amplifier computer. The initial use of this computer was
somewhat limited because of the lack of programming experience
of the faculty and the unavailability of removable patch pan
els (i.e. it was necessary to patch a problem directly on the
face of the computer and then remove it before another problem
could be patched). When the manufacturer did finally provide
removable patch panels, the demand for the computer increased
sharply to the point where it was no longer adequate. The
quantity of computing equipment has increased continually to
meet the growing demand and it is anticipated that this trend
will continue for some time in the future, although our future
purchases may be determined to some extent by the recent de
velopments in digital simulation.
At present 32 patch panels are available for use by any
student in the University. The analog computer laboratory is
open 4 or 5 days a week with supervision and is run on an open
*Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem
ber 1964, Publication release was obtained by the author.
shop basis. A student may obtain a patch panel, cords, bottle
plugs and any other related equipment, patch his problem and
run it on a computer without completing any paperwork. Upon
completion of the problem, the student returns the panel and
components to the central supply area in the laboratory.
Patch panels may be retained for further computation for a
period of time which is determined primarily by the current
demand for additional patch panels to.start new problems.
When this time during which a patch panel may be retained be
comes too short, additional patch panels are purchased.
Undergraduates are encouraged to use the analog computer
routinely in the solution of assigned problems. The facili
ties of the computer.laboratory are used extensively in under
graduate and graduate courses in kinetics and reactor design,
and process dynamics and control, an undergraduate seminar in
mathematical modeling, an introductory sophomore course in
analog and digital computation and a senior projects course.
The Departments of Mechanical Engineering, Electrical Engineer
ing and Psychology are presently using the analog computer
laboratory and it is anticipated that several other depart
ments will do so in the near future.
The Advantages of Analog Computation:
Experience has indicated that the following advantages
can be attributed directly to'the availability of small analog
computers:
1. Undergraduates have an opportunity to gain valuable
experience in the mathematical modeling of physical systems.
In deriving the system equations, they must make use of the
basic principles of physics, chemistry and engineering. It
is usually necessary for them to decide which phenomena must
be taken into consideration in their analysis in order to ar
rive at a realistic model and which phenomena can be dismissed
as unimportant in contributing to the performance of the sys
tem so as to keep the model within manageable proportions.
The contribution of the analog computer is, of course, that
it enables the student to do something useful and practical
with the model after it has been formulated.
2. The programming of an analog computer, in common
with all computer programming, requires careful problem form
ulation and attention to detail. On the other hand, the com
puter enables the student to essentially bypass the details
of mathematical analysis required to solve the model. He does
not become engulfed in complex mathematical manipulations but
instead can proceed directly to the solution. The analog com
puter is, of course, particularly valuable for nonlinear prob
lems for which there are no known analytical methods of solu
tion. The effects of system nonlinearities are easily assess
ed and the limitations of a linearized analysis are soon ap
parent.
3. The student can experiment with the modeled system
and investigate a large number of alternatives in a short per
iod of time. In a sense he can optimize the system by trial
anderror experimentation on the computer.
It is therefore not surprising to find that most students
are analog computer enthusiasts, particularly the better stu
dents who are strongly oriented towards the analytical approach
to engineering problems.
An Example:
The following simple problem in chemical kinetics illus
trates the procedure for programming a problem for analog com
puter solution
kl k2
A > B C
Compute the concentration of A, B and C as a function of time
when initially, A = 1 (mol fraction), B = 0, C = 0*. Consider
three cases: k = 0.1, kg = 1; k, = 0.25, k2 = 0.25;
ki = 1, k2 = 0.1 (sec).
1. State the equations, initial conditions and parameters.
The equations should be arranged to give the highest order de
rivatives explicitly.
1.1 Firstorder kinetics
dA/dt = kA
dB/dt = kiA k2B
dC/dt = k2B
*We refer to this as the "Piel's Beer" problem
ki k2
Green beer  Piel's Beer  Stale beer
The objective then is to catch the "Piel's Beer at its
peak."
1.2 Secondorder kinetics
dA/dt = kiA2
dB/dt = kA2 k2B2
dG/dt = k2B2
Initial conditions: A(0) = 1, B(0) = 0, C(0) = 0
Parameters: I ki = 0.1, k2 = 1
II ki = 0.25, k2 = 0.25
III 'k = 1, k2 = 0.1
2. Magnitude scale the equations. The output of any
operational amplifier in the computer .shbuld not exceed the
reference voltage ( lOv in the case of an EAI TR10 or TR
20) or be so small that the computing accuracy is poor. It
is therefore necessary to scale all of the dependent vari
ables of the equations so as to keep the voltages represen
ting these variables in the proper range. In this case
scaling is quite easy since the dependent variables are all
mol fractions with a maximum value of 1 which immediately
suggests a scale factor of 10. If square brackets I ] are
used to represent a scaled variable (i.e. a voltage in the
computer), the original equations can be scaled as:
Firstorder Kinetics
d[10A]/dt = ki[10A (1)
d[10B]/dt = k,[10A] k [10B] (2)
d[lOC]/dt = k[1OB] (3)
Secondorder Kinetics
d[10A]/dt = kI[10A 2/10 (4)
d[10B]/dt = k,[10A12/10 k2[10B 2/10 (5)
d[lOC]/dt = k2[lOB]2/10 (6)
[loa(o)] = 10
3. Draw the computer circuit diagram. The circuit for
the solution of Equations 1, 2, and 3 is given in Figure 1
and for Equations 4, 5, and 6 in Figure 2.
4. Time scale. In this case the setting of potentio
meters 1 and 2 (i.e. the values of k, and k2 respectively)
are reasonable and therefore time scaling is not required.
Thus problem time and computer time are the same. If the
rate constants for Case I had been ki = 0.001, k2 = 0.01,
potentiometers 1 and 2 could still be set to 0.1 and 1 re
spectively and the computer would run 100 times faster than
the physical system. On the other hand if the rate constants
had been k2 = 100, k2 = 1000, potentiometers 1 and 2 could be
set to 0.1 and 1 respectively and the computer would, run 1000
times slower than the physical system. These considerations
can be generalized: The inputs to all integrators can be
changed by a constant factor in order to arrive at reason
able potentiometer settings and loop gains without changing
the solution. The ratio of problem time to computer time
equals this constant factor. In a sense then, time scaling
takes care of itself quite naturally.
5. Static check. A static check is analogous to a
hand calculation used for debugging a digital computer pro
gram. It is indispensable for the successful operation of
an analog computer, particularly when the amount of time
each problem is on the computer is to be minimized. The
static check will detect most programming errors and computer
components which are not operating properly.
In the present case, the following voltages should ap
pear at the outputs of the indicated amplifiers before the
computer is put into operation:
Amplifier Output
1 +10v
2 0
3 0
4 0
Figure 1. Analog Computer Circuit
for Linear Kinetics.
Figure 2. Analog Computer Circuit
for Nonlinear Kinetics.
. .. .. I, I I i I I I1 I
I I I I I I I I I I l l
HFAtH:1fH dTHT:
t I f i I a[li I il l I 1 Il lij
IIllI ll ~ll
I' I I" 'I I I I" L~4lC4If~t l t*IIttrtr
I I I I I I I I .l I I I I 1 1 I "
., ., ., ... o. I I
1N
II I 1 II 1 I
iI 1
JEI IIIL
^ _I_ :_ I I
[7 __ I I I I I [ I I A I I I I I I I I i i I I I
L L I I I I !!:! !\ I : : I I I I I: I I t I
S : i
__'. '
llallltl]lililll
. v 
L' '' CU I e  t
_ I .a I l i J I L li a r l i a r n e r s
I I I I I I I I I I I ii I i~i I I r I I I I I II I I I ~ ~
CL~i
+Ll
 1

0"1
8'0
9'0
V"O
i:
._ 4 .
E:4i, ;p ;::
::::_p[ ini:;II_
O'* 8g0
900 "'O Z'O
0
29
I F
I I I Ii.
'C
1 1 
Ei'
u i T^
I
UI l~.E  : II!
b::=:::5T:: :i ::::,::,
Ely
l l I I I I I 1 1 I I IF
Tv
OT
KL;
7LZ
7i~i~
Vt'
AI
'.;:/_
IW
9'0
30
I
IV,
t1.
. i I I I
^+.
A more complete check can be made by artificially introducing
an initial condition into each integrator and by summing the
inputs used to form the highestorder derivative in each
equation (the inputs to amplifiers 1 and 2 in this case).
This sum can then be checked against the values of the high
estorder derivatives computed directly from the system
equations.
6. Run the problem and document the results. Since
it is possible to rapidly generate a large number of solu
tions in a short period of time, it is essential to document
these solutions as they are obtained. The solutions to the
present problem as they appeared on the xy plotter are given
in Figures 3, 4 and 5.
This kinetics problem is especially simple from the
point of view of magnitude and time scaling. The author
has put together several small linear and nonlinear prob
lems with detailed solutions which illustrate the more typi
cal complexities of scaling. These problems are available
upon request.
DEPARTMENTALIZED CURRICULUM BASED ON CHEMICAL CHANGE*
William H. Corcoran
Professor of Chemical Engineering
California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, California

Abstract: Departmentalized curriculum based on chemical
change is defined. Then, better building upon highschool pre
paration to keep a 4year undergraduate program in chemical
engineering is discussed. Emphasis is placed upon the need
to prevent proliferation of courses and work in the presence
of the continual acceleration in the growth of knowledge.
Argument is given in favor of teaching principles and develop
ing abilities to think, with the belief that the best type of
men will aggressively and successfully continue to treat their
own technological gaps. The need for continual analysis of
curricula is reviewed. Suggestions are given for improved
teaching of chemical principles in the early part of the chem
ical engineering program and for a new attack to chemical en
gineering design in the senior year.
  
In a discussion of a departmentalized curriculum in chem
ical engineering, or any branch of engineering, the first
thing to consider is what is meant by departmentalized curri
culum relative to a general engineering curriculum. There
could be many definitions, but one choice would distinguish
between the two by noting that the departmentalized curriculum
would provide the opportunity for the B.S. graduate to be pre
pared properly for specialized or semispecialized employment
after four years of undergraduate education. A departmental
ized curriculum based on chemical change would have 15 to 20
per cent of the program devoted to appropriate courses in
chemistry. The generalized curriculum would not give signi
ficant specialized preparation, and at least another year of
study would be required to provide the student with the neces
sary professional tools to begin specialized employment.
After one has considered the meaning of departmentalized
curriculum, the next act could logically be the asking of why
be concerned about that curriculum when a generalized four
*Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem
ber 1964. Publication release was obtained by the author.
year program with one or two years ofj:.graduate study in pro
fessional subjects would certainly give a sound training for
the first professional degree. The response is threefold:
1. We are less stimulated to significant changes in cur
ricula if we are just allowed to extend course work.
The fouryear program for the first professional de
gree demands significant and continuous revision in
order to provide the most uptodate training and
education in a restricted time schedule.
2. Tuition charges in at least the private schools con
tinue to rise. For example, in 196566, the yearly
tuition at the California Institute of Technology
will be $1800. The increase of one or two years in
the program for the first professional degree adds
significant educational expenses for tuition and
other charges.
3. Space needs are always critical in universities. The
addition of 25 to 50 per cent in curriculum time means
increased facilities. Should money be put into that
area or should it be put into efforts on improved
teaching, better linking of research and teaching,
and related fields?
The professional training of a chemical engineer is prob
ably less tractable in the framework of a generalized curri
culum for preparatory work than for other engineering profes
sions. The chemical engineer is marked by his particular
concern with the economic control of chemical reactions for
the benefit of mankind in either defense or nondefense work.
As a chemical engineer, and not just as an engineer, he must
know about the subtleties of chemical reactions that are not
just simply handled by writing chemical rate equations in com
binations with transport equations to design chemical reactors.
For example, if he is to maximize his ability to program the
best type of knowledge into a computer, it is now desirable
and becoming necessary that he have some understanding of the
movements of electrons in the framework of chemical reactions.
He cannot afford to wait too long in his college work to get
the background that will allow him to think in chemical terms.
That background would include a significant amount of train
ing in physical chemistry, chemical kinetics, inorganic chem
istry, and organic chemistry. If that work were left in the
main to the latter professional part of a training program,
more than a year of work after a fouryear program would be
necessary for the chemical engineer. The man would be well
trained, no doubt, but in consideration of time and money
would the gain be necessary relative to the needs of the em
ployer or to those of the man himself in any subsequent gradu
ate work?
A departmentalized curriculum to prepare a man for spec
ialized professional performance after four years of under
graduate work appears to be a continuing possibility. The
possibility seems very desirable in these days of increasing
tuition and of increasing ability of entering freshmen. Rather
than to think that we must increase our training at the under
graduate level and move toward a generalized engineering pro
gram in that period of development, we should look closely at
our educational techniques and be willing to make significant
changes in our teaching program in order to provide an educa
tion in a specialized way in four years. There is a tendency
today to believe that as progress adds to our armamentarium
of technical ideas and methods at a high rate we must communi
cate a large portion of this fund of knowledge to the student
before he receives even his first degree. Instead of that
concern we should emphasize the development of the thinking
abilities of the student. We should be more selective in our
teaching and spend more time on principles and less time on
technological details. The principles can certainly be taught
in the framework of technology, but the technology really
should serve mainly as a matrix for the development of the an
alytical abilities of the students. As a student develops his
thinking powers and interest in his own selfeducation, he
should experience no particular difficulty in continually fill
ing in the crevices in his knowledge with technical details
that are evolving day by day.
We have not really exploited the abilities of freshmen
entering from the many excellent high schools in the United
States. Even though the students have been exposed to im
proved courses in mathematics, physics, and chemistry in the
high school, we have not done enough in providing those courses
with an engineering flavor to exploit fully the opportunity to
optimize the preparation of the man who is to become a fresh
man in an engineering college. The lack of integrated effort
between engineering educators and highschool departments of
science and mathematics is a challenge that is especially di
rected to us who favor the concept of a departmentalized cur
riculum based upon chemical change.
The simplest way to focus thoughts on curriculum is to be
specific, and so a fouryear program for the near future is
proposed which would continue to provide the high level of
education we have today, would accommodate for the increasing
ly exciting additions to knowledge and methods, and would al
low the graduate from that program to work for any chemical
industry and perform well in operations and possibly develop
ment work or enter graduate work in chemical engineering in
the best schools in the United States. Humanities training
would be about 20 per cent of the curriculum and electives a
bout 10 per cent.
Table 1 shows the proposed curriculum. The data are
shown for a quarter system with three terms in the academic
year of 9 months. The units noted in the table represent the
total number of class and home hours per.week assigned to the
different subjects. Conversion of units to semester hours is
accomplished by multiplying by 2/9. Overall percentages of
time devoted to a given area of effort are more meaningful,
and are shown in the summary Table 2. Table 3 gives the cur
rent program at the California Institute of Technology, and
in Table 4 there is a summary of the details in Table 3.
A comparison of the proposed and current curricula shows
two major changes. First, the new proposal calls for a new
course in chemistry for the first and second years. It would
be a systematized integration of physical chemistry, inorganic
chemistry, and organic chemistry in place of the current se
parate courses in quantitative chemistry, organic chemistry,
and physical chemistry. Sufficient progress has been made in
the development of quantitative organic chemistry that such
integration seems possible. Not only would the course be
taught to chemical engineers, but strong consideration should
be given to its inclusion in all engineering and science courses
to improve the scientific literacy of the undergraduate. The
second major change is the proposed senior course in chemical
engineering design. In the suggested curriculum, the student
at the end of his junior year would be well trained in many
aspects of applied mathematics and able to move more rapidly
in the parts of design work concerned with applied mechanics
than if the applied mechanics had been taken at a lower level
of training. Therefore there is some logic in suggesting a
significant course in chemical engineering design which would
bring together stoichiometry, industrial chemistry, economics,
applied mechanics, and strength of materials with the student's
knowledge of transport phenomena at a given time in the senior
year.
Electives would be available for the senior year in areas
such as electrical engineering, applied mechanics, and other
technical fields. The electives courses would be selected ac
cording to the developing interest of the student relative to
graduate school or industrial work. In the suggested curricu
lum, significant education in principles of chemistry, physics,
mathematics, and engineering would be allowed. Only parts of
current technology would be presented to the chemical engineer
inhis first four years, and they would be more concerned with
explaining principles than with just technological knowledge
for its own sake. The student would be expected to have pre
pared himself, however, to think clearly in the attack of new
problems and to have the courage to work on these problems even
in the face of failure. His technological development would
be a continuing part of his graduate and subsequent profession
al study or of his professional work alone.
In summary,.a sevenpoint program is:suggested for in
suring a highquality departmentalized curriculum in chemical
engineering to be given in four years and to have chemical
change as the main basis for its: differentiationfrom general
engineering. The seven points are:
1. Continue with a strong effort to teach why. Worry
less about all technology and focus more on use of
new technology to illustrate old and new principles.
2. Build more carefully upon the greatly improved edu
cation in high school.
3. Work to introduce more engineering thinking into the
problems and laboratory assignments in highschool
science and mathematics.
4. Introduce more engineering problems and attitudes in
to the lowerdivision college courses in mathematics,
physics, and chemistry, and integrate that effort
with the upperdivision engineering courses.
5. Introduce a new twoyear chemistry course in which
physical chemistry, inorganic chemistry, and organic
chemistry have been systematically combined in place
of the oftenused threeyear program of separate gen
eral and quantitative chemistry, organic chemistry,
and physical chemistry.
6. Introduce a thirdyear course in quantum mechanics
and statistical mechanics with carefully prepared
applications in the gaseous, liquid, and solid states.
7. Build more carefully in the fourth year on the advanced
principles developed in the first three years. Use
fewer units to cover work more intensively. Speci
fically, introduce a new senior course in chemical
engineering design to encompass work in stoichiometry,
industrial chemistry, economics, applied mechanics,
and strength of materials.
The above steps as they pertain to college work are achievable
even in the presence of 20 per cent of the curriculum devoted
to Humanities and 10 per cent to electives.
Table 1
Proposed FourYear Undergraduate Course in Chemical Engineering
First Year
(Same for all Science and Engineering Students)
Units per term
1st 2nd 3rd
Mathematics
Physics
Chemistry
English
History
Graphics
Calculus, Vector Algebra,
Analytic Geometry, Infinite
series ...................... 12
Kinematics, Particle Mechanics
and Electric Forces ......... 12
Physical Chemistry, Inorganic
Chemistry, and Organic Chem
istry ........... ........ ... 12
English Literature 6
History of European Civiliza
tion .......... ............... 5
Basic Graphics .............. 3
12 12
12
12
6
5 5
47 47
Second Year
History
Mathematics
Physics
Chemistry
History and Government of the
United States ............... 6
Calculus (functions of several
variables), Probability, Vector
Analysis, Group Theory, Differ
ential Equations, Numerical
Analysis ..................... 12
Electricity, Fields, and Atomic
Structure .................... 12
Physical Chemistry, Inorganic
Chemistry, Organic Chemistry 12
Electives in Science and/or
Engineering ............... 9
51
6 6
12 12
12 12
12 12
9 9
51 51
Table 1. (Continued)
Third Ydar
English
Economics
Electrical
Engineering
Advanced
Physical
Chemistry
Chemical
Engineering
Chemical
Engineering
Mathematics
Advanced Literature *..........
Economic Principles and Problems
Electronics and Circuit Theory ...
Quantum Mechanics, Statistical
Mechanics, Applications to solids,
liquids, and gases (solid state
theory, plasmas, etc.)...........
Computer programming as applied to
chemical engineering problems ....
Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics,
Applied Chemical Thermodynamics ...
Engineering Mathematics, Mathemati
cal treatment of problems in En
gineering Chemistry and Physics,
Complex Variables, Series, Partial
Differential Equations, Boundary
Value of Problems, Integral Trans
forms ........................
Units per term
1st 2nd 3rd
8 8 8
6 6
10 
10 10
 3 3
10 10
12 12
49 49
Fourth Year
Humanities Electives ..*..........
Public Affairs ...................
Chemical Transport Phenomena .............
Engineering
Chemical Unit Operations .................
Engineering
Chemical Kinetics .........................
Engineering
Chemical Chemical Engineering Laboratory ..
Engineering
Chemical Chemical Engineering Design (Process
Engineering design and study of strength of ma
terials and elasticity applied to
process components in framework of
industrial chemistry and economics)
Electives Free Electives ...................
9 9 9
2 2 2
L2 12 
 12
9 
 9 9
Humanities
History
Table 2
Percentage Distribution of Time in Proposed FourYear
Undergraduate Program in Chemical Engineering
Area Per Cent of Time
Mathematics 18.0
Physics 12.0
Chemistry 16.9
Chemical Engineering 21.4
Free Electives 5.0
Electrical Engineering 1.7
Science and Engineering Electives 4.5
Graphics 0.5
Humanities 20.0
Table 3
Current Undergraduate Course in Chemical Engineering
at the California Institute of Technology
First Year
(Common to all Curricula)
Units per term
Ist 2nd 3rd
Ma 1 abc Calculus, Vector Algebra, Analytic
Geometry ...........................
Ph 1 abc Kinematics, Particle Mechanics, and
Electric Forces ....................
Ch 1 abc General and Quantitative Chemistry .
En I abc English Literature .................
H 1 abc History of European Civilization ...
Gr 1 Basic Graphics .. ................
12
12
12
6.
5
3
50
12 12
Second Year
H 2 abc History and Government of the United
States .............................
Ma 2 abc Sophomore Mathematics ..............
Ph 2 abc Electricity, Fields, and Atomic
Structure ................. ......
Ch 41 abc Basic Organic Chemistry ...........
Ch 46 ab Basic Organic Chemistry Laboratory .
Electives in Science and/or Engineer
ing* ........ .. .... .. ..... .......
L2 12
LO 4
6
Table 3 (Cont.)
Third Year
Units per term
1st 2nd 3rd
Advanced Literature .............
Economic Principles and Problems ...
Quantitative Analysis .............
Physical Chemistry .................
Physical Chemistry Laboratory ......
Chemical Engineering Thermodynamic._
Engineering Mathematics ...........
8 8
6
10
9 9
8
9 6
12 12
48 49
Fourth Year
Humanities Electives .............
Public Affairs .....................
Adaptive Design ...................
Industrial Chemistry .............
Applied Chemical Thermodynamics ....
Transport Phenomena ................
Chemical Engineering Laboratory ....
Unit Operations ....................
Electives*...... .. ............ .....
9
2
9
9
12
610
4751
9 9
2 2
9
9
12
9 9
12
610 610
4751 4751
*If an electrical engineering course in electronics and cir
cuit theory is not elected in the sophomore year, the adviser
will strongly recommend its inclusion in the senior year.
En
Ec
Ch
Ch
Ch
ChE
AM
7abo
4ab
14
21abc
26ab
63ab
95abe
H
ME
ChE
ChE
ChE
ChE
ChE
5abe
55
61ab
64
66ab
67ab
73
Table 4
Percentage Distribution of Time in Current Undergraduate
Program in Chemical Engineering at the California
Institute of Technology
Area
Mathematics
Physics
Chemistry
Chemical Engineering
Free Electives
Mechanical Engineering Design
Science or Engineering Electives
Graphics
Humanities
Per Cent of Time
18.5
12.3
20.3
16.4
5.1
1.5
4.6
0.51
20.5
A COMMON STUDIES CURRICULUM IN ENGINEERING*
Eric Weger
Chairman, Department of Chemical Engineering
Washington University
St. Louis, Missouri
r  
Abstract: The common studies program in engineering at
Washington University is discussed from the viewpoint of the
chemical engineering curriculum. The courses in engineering
science and applied mathematics taken by all engineering un
dergraduates are discussed first. The three courses speci
fically oriented toward chemical engineering are described
and special emphasis is given to a new senior course which
has the objective of acquainting the students with process
design problems.
The Common Studies Program was put into effect in our
Engineering School at Washington University in the fall of
1962. The program is based on the belief that there is a
basic body of knowledge  in science, mathematics, and the
engineering sciences which anyone in engineering should
possess regardless of their specialty.
The program consists of 79 units (or credits, a unit
being 1 semester hour of a course, or 2 lab hours) of courses.
Of the 79, 52 are taken in the Arts and Sciences College, 
the ones listed as "General" in Table 1. The other 27 are
taken in the field of Engineering Sciences.
As can be seen from Table 2, the curriculum for Chemical
Engineering in the first two years consist solely of common
studies courses. The one exception for Chemical Engineering
students is that they must take a more comprehensive second
semester of general chemistry as a prerequisite to the addi
tional chemistry they have to take later on. This permits
a choice of a specific engineering field to be put off until
the student is well into his second year. We feel this to be
desirable, since the average incoming freshman usually has no
basis for making an intelligent choice in this matter.
* Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem
ber 1964. Publication release was obtained by the author.
One of the fields in'which we thought all engineering
students should obtain a comparable background was applied
mathematics. The details of the common studies program in
mathematics courses can be seen in Table 2. After three
semesters of Calculus given by the Mathematics Department,
the students begin their applied math sequence in the Engi
neering School.
Two semesters of classical applied mathematics (called
Analysis I and II to appease the mathematicians) present or
dinary and partial differential equations, vectors, complex
variables, operational methods, Fourier series, etc. The
techniques of "setting up" problems for mathematical solution
are heavily emphasized, especially in the first semester. The
course entitled "Numerical Methods" in the junior year is en
tirely computer oriented. The students become acquainted with
computer techniques and simple programming. They are encour
aged in all their subsequent courses to make use of the com
puter whenever it might be of help to them. They punch their
own programs and batches are run off three times a day on
MWashington University's IBM 7072 computer. The Statistics
course completes the sequence.
,Among the other engineering science common studies courses,
the Thermodynamics course is probably of special interest to
Chemical Engineers. It is, of bourse, not possible nor desir
able perhaps, to cover some: of;the specifically chemical en
gineering aspects of thermodynamics in the core course. These
are taken up in the subsequent Elements of Chemical Engineer
ing Course.
This brings us to the specialized Chemical Engineering
part of the program. First of all, there are, of course,
additional chemistry courses. I might say here that the po
sition of these courses is not the optimum from our viewpoint.
This is especially so with respect to Physical Chemistry. We
would like to see this in the curriculum somewhere before the
senior year. However, we are constrained by the fact that the
Chemistry Department teaches it definitely on a senior level.
Consequently some of the physical chemistry topics which Chem
ical Engineering students need for their senior design course
have to be taught by us.V:
There are actually1 nly three undergraduate courses
taught by the Chemical' Engineering Department. The first is
a Transport Phenomena course and its associated laboratory.
This is a full year course. The text by Bird, Stewart, and
Lightfoot is used in the lectures and the laboratory manual
by Crosby is followed to a large extent in the Lab. The next
Chemical Engineering curse is the Elements of Chemical En
gineering course. 'Thi~ course is a very intensive one semes
ter presentation of basic stoichiometry, some of the chemical
engineering aspects:of thermodynamics, and the fundamentals of
kinetics. To do all this in one semester, we have allotted 4
lecture hours and a2 hour problem working session per week
to the course.
The course listed as Process Analysis and Design in the
fourth year of the Chqmical Engineering curriculum is being
taught for the first time during the 196465 academic year.
The objective of this course is to acquaint the student with
and give him some practice in the various aspects of chemical
process design. You must keep in mind that up to this point
the student has not been brought into contact with the tradi
tional unit operations, reactor design, economics, or design
problems. The senior Process Analysis course must, therefore,
cover some of the important aspects of all of these topics.
We have also found it necessary to include some additional
material on vaporliquid equilibria, estimation of properties
and mass and energy balances.
The design aspect of the course is being handled by taking
up a series of "ease studies". The present plan is to have a
bout halfadozen of these. The problems presented to the
students will he progressively more sophisticated and diffi
cult. As an example I might cite the first case study which
was handed out to our seniors. It is a project to produce a
"Preliminary Design and Economics Evaluation of Processes for
Producing Cyclohexane from Benzene". Both gas and liquid
phase processes are to be explored. The students, paired in
teams of two and three,have been given about four weeks to
come up with a Tentative Process Report. For this first pro
ject they are being given a great deal of assistance in loca
ting sources of property data, outlining of process flow
sheets, etc. In the later studies they will be expected to
do more of this themselves. We are planning case studies to
cover some of the newer aspects of chemical engineering, such
as biochemical and aerothermochemical engineering, as well as
the more traditional processes.
Concurrently with work on their case studies, the students
are attending lectures on continuous and stagewise processes,
reactor design, and process economics. One of the four units
assigned to the course is for one laboratory period or problem
working session per week. This period will be utilized during
the second semester for a ten week series of sessions on pro
cess control (both lecture and lab) and also some additional
laboratory work with equipment such as distillation columns,
which were not encountered in the Transport Phenomena Labora
tory.
The big problem in tlis 'cdurse is to present the material
in such a way that it ties in meaningfully with the material
in the basic and engineering sciences which the students have
had in their first three years. I think, on the basis of our
present limited experience, that so far we are succeeding.
In conclusion, I would say that I believe that we have
achieved as good a balance as is possible of analysis and syn
thesis in our curriculum of chemical engineering courses tied
in with a common studies program. I feel that this curriculum
will be suitable both for the terminal Bachelors man as well
as.the prospective graduate student.
Table 1
Washington University
School of Engineering and Applied Science
Common Studies Program
General
English Composition 6
Chemistry 8
Physics 8
Mathematics 12
Electives*. 18
52
Engineering Sciences
Mechanics 6
Electrical Sciences 7
Thermodynamics 3
Engineering Analysis** 11
27
*Recommended courses include languages, literature, econ
omics, history, sociology, psychology, philosophy, and
political science.
**Includes statistics and an introduction to digital com
puters.
Table '2
Washington University
Curriculum in Chemical Engineering
FALL SEMESTER
Phys. 117 Gen. Physics
Math. 116 Calculus I
ECMP 101 Eng. Comp.
Humanity Electives
Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band
Math.
Chem.
Engr.
216 Calculus III
111 Gen. Chem.
213 Networks I
Engr. 231 Mechanics I
Humanity Elective
Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band
FIRST YEAR
Units
4
4
3
36
(1)
1417
SPRING SEMESTER
Phys. 118 Gen. Physics
Math. 215 Calculus II
ECMP 102 Eng. Comp.
Humanity Electives
Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band
SECOND YEAR
4 Engr. 211 Analysis I
5 Chem. 112 Gen. Chem.
3 Engr. 214 Networks II
Engr. 219 Networks Lab.
3 Engr. 232 Mechanics II
3 Humanity Elective
(1) Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band
18
Units
4
4
3
36
(1?
1417
3
5
3
1
3
3
(1)
18.
Tj
365 Num. Methods
320 Thermodynamics
312 Analysis II
367 Transport Phen.
373 Trans. Phen. Lab
241 Quantitative
THIRD YEAR
2 Engr.
Engr.
Engr.
Engr.
Chem.
325 Statistics 3
358 Elems. of Ch.E. 5
368 Transport Phen. 3
374 Trans. Phen. Lab 2
254 Organic 5
FOURTH YEAR
Engr. 477 Proc. Anal. and
Design
Chem. 421 Physical
Chem. 431 Physical Lab.
Humanity Elective
Technical Electives
3
1
03
6
Engr. 478 Proc. Anal. and
Design
Chem. 422 Physical
Chem. 432 Physical Lab.
Humanity Elective
Technical Electives
1417
Total number of units: 133
Engr.
Engr.
Engr.
Engr.
Engr.
Chem.
4
3
1
03
6
1417
THE UNDERGRADUATE CURRICULUM IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING AT YALE*
Charles A. Walker, Professor
Wnd
John A. Tallmadge, Associate Professor
Department of Engineering and Applied Science
Yale University
New Haven, Connecticut
In a reorganization in July 1962, the Department of En
gineering and Applied Science was created at Yale to replace
to a large extent the School of Engineering. The degree of
Bachelor of Science is offered by the Department as a part of
Yale College and degrees of Master of Science and Doctor of
Philosophy are offered through the Yale Graduate School.
In making the transition from a School to a Department
it was necessary to adopt the general requirements of Yale
College for the bachelor's degree. These requirements include
as one feature a program for distribution of studies. This
program of distribution requires every student to elect a full
year course or two term courses in each of the following
fields: (1) English; (2) a foreign language at the second
year level; (3) history; (4) social studies; (5) the natur
al sciences; (6) philosophy; (7) a second course in natural
science or mathematics at the secondyear level or a course
in literature in a foreign language. Since requirements (5)
and (7) are met automatically by students in Engineering and
Applied Science programs, this means that at least five year
courses of the twenty normally taken must be in fields other
than science, mathematics and engineering. The curriculum is
so arranged that as many as eightcourses may be taken outside
those fields.
Other features of the Yale scene should be borne in mind
in considering the curriculum pattern for chemical engineering.
One of the most important of these is the fact that most of
the students graduating from Yale College receive the degree
of Bachelor of Arts in the humanities. The Class of 1965,
for example, includes about 800 candidates for degrees in the
humanities, 110 for degrees in the natural sciences and 50
for degrees in engineering and applied science. Our students
thus carry on their engineering studies in a community in
*Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem
ber 1964. Publication release was obtained by the author a.
+ Current address: Imperial College of Science and Technology,
London, England.
which the humanities are dominant and this has both advantages
and disadvantages. Our students benefit from the high:quality
ofnteaching in the humanities and acquit themselves well in
competition with students in other majors. However, as Astin
[Science, 141, 3348 (1963)] has pointed out, such an environ
ment, characteristic of several of the Northeastern men's
colleges, has a decidedly negative effect on the student's
decision to pursue a career.in science and his conclusions
probably also apply to engineering students. That is to say,
it is a characteristic of Yale and other schools in this group
that a Freshman planning to enter the field of science is more
likely to be dissuaded from this choice than he would in other
schools.
A second factor which should be borne in mind is the ori
entation of Yale students after graduation. Over twothirds
of Yale graduates enter graduate or professional schools.
For example, 649 of the 956members of the Class of 1964 en
tered into advanced study and a sizeable number (280) of these
chose law and business schools. This trend of graduates to
the enterprising professions is also seen among graduates
from programs offered by the Department of Engineering and
Applied Science. Of the graduates of this Department in 1964,
more than onefourth entered law schools and business schools;
the others were evenly divided between graduate school in en
gineering and science and industrial positions.
In terms of size, the Department of Engineering and Ap
plied Science with fiftythree faculty members is somewhat
smaller than the Department of English or the Department of
History and is about the same size as the Department of Physics.
In addition to the 5070 undergraduate students per year re
ceiving degrees, this Department also has in residence about
30 candidates for the degree of Master of Science and 120
candidates for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
This, then, is the framework within which the program in
chemical engineering is planned and administrated. It is a
program characterized by flexibility, a feature which is con
sidered to be essential in view of the factors discussed above.
The Department of Engineering and Applied Science is not
formally broken into subgroups representing the traditional
fields of engineering nor into subgroups according to other
patterns such as the engineering sciences. The Department of
some 50 faculty members is small enough that subgroups may
not be as necessary as they would be in schools which have
many more faculty members. This is not to say that subgroups
do not exist. They form naturally according to common inter
ests but they no longer have formal status. There is, for
example, a natural subgroup of faculty members with primary
interests in chemical engineering and the members of this
subgroup are responsible for activities in our field. Admin
istratively, we make recommendations regarding our curriculum
and research programs to the larger group. In this regard,
we have the usual problems of communicating with our colleagues
whose work is based in physicsrather than in chemistry.
The Department offers some 50 term courses at the under
graduate level in the fields of applied mathematics, chemical
engineering, electronics, mechanics of solids and structures,
mechanics of fluids, control systems, communications, solid
state science, etc. These courses are listed by level in
Table 1 in a manner similar to that used in the catalog.
Each student is required to build a fouryear program on the
following general scheme:
3 terms of physics
3 terms of mathematics
2 terms of chemistry
16 terms of courses in engineering, applied science, science
10 terms of distributional requirements
6 terms of electives
The selection of courses in engineering and science must
be on a basis to form some coherent pattern but a high degree
of flexibility is allowed. Such a system requires close con
sultation between the student and his faculty advisors in or
der to insure that the course plan is in fact a coherent one
and that the student is aware of requirements for admission
to graduate schools and of the requirements of industry and
government for various kinds of positions.
Turning now to the specific case of chemical engineering,
it is expected that the majority of students interested in
this field will plan a curriculum in accord with the pattern
shown in Figure 1. However, we expect that some students will
vary this pattern by substitution within the block of E. and
A. S. courses. For example, a student with strong interests
in applied mathematics or control systems or physics of fluids
could replace some of the suggested courses with others if he
has a strong reason for doing so.
The greatest degree of flexibility comes about, however,
with the eight terms of electives, two of which must be in
engineering or science. The student planning to enter gradu
ate school would be urged to elect courses in mathematics,
computers, physics of fluids, or a senior project in chemical
engineering. Those planning to enter industry directly might
find it advisable to elect courses in economics or data pro
cessing or personnel administration.
Thus we feel that we have a core curriculum which can be
tailored to the requirements of students with a variety of in
terests. It will be recognized, of course, that other insti
tutions have similar programs. Hence we present this program
not as something new and different but simply as a curriculum
in chemical engineering which seems to us to fit the raquire
ments of the Yale students of today.
Many aspects of this approach are present in the interim
programs developed for the Classes of 1966 to 1968; the elec
tive flexibility has applied to all clas:sesfrom 1962 on since
it was adopted for undergraduate engineers in 1959. However,
as the Class of 1969 will be the first to follow this program
for all four years, it is not possible to attempt an overall
evaluation of this curriculum now.
Figure 1
A Suggested Pattern in Chemical Engineering
Term
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
1 I
Applied Manentum Separa Heat Reaction
Mathematics Mathe and Mass tin Trans
I matics Transport Processs fer
Digital
I Physics Computa Thermodynamics Design
i tion I
SI ____________I
r II
General Organic Physical EAS EAS
Chemistry Chemistry Chemistry elective elective
I I t
English Kistory Philosophy Elective
i I \ *i
Foreign Social ,
Language Science Elective Elective
____________________________________________ _________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________
Table 1
Term Courses Offered by the Department of
Engineering and Applied Science.
Sophomore or Junior Level
Digital Computation
Thermodynamics
Mechanics of Deformable Bodies
Linear Systems
Physical Electronics
Engineering Analysis
Applications of Ordinary Differential Equations
Applications of Partial Differential Equations
Applications of the Complex Variable
Electronic Circuits
Advanced Networks
Advanced Mechanics
Momentum and Mass Transport
Chemical Thermodynamics
Communications, Language, and Machines
Physical Metallurgy
Solid State Science
Senior Level
Case Studies in the Interaction of Engineering and
Society
Probability and Stochastic Processes
Numerical Analysis
Applied Discrete Mathematics
Digital Systems
Quantum Mechanics
Fluid Mechanics
Heat Transfer
Energy Conversion
Structural Mechanics
Elasticity
Electric and Magnetic Fields
Nonlinear Magnetics
Communication Theory
Control Theory
Separation Theory
Reaction Kinetics
Engineering Design
Modern Experimental Techniques
Special Projects
Number
lOa
22a
23b
26a,27b
29b
30a
30b
31b
32a
35a
38a
39b
42a
43b
45
48a
49b
Number
50a,51b
56a
47b
58a
59b
60b
61a,62b
64a
65b
68a
69b
70a
72a
74a
76a,77b
81b
83b
86a,87b
88a,89b
99a,91b
SOLUTION TO THE.PREVIOUS PROBLEM
which appeared in 3: No.1, 33 (1964)
Restatement of Problem:
Consider an infinitely long,, counterflow, water to water,
heat exchanger. Making appropriate.assumptions, prove that
the temperature pinch must occur at the inlet of the stream
with the larger flow rate, and nowhere else along the exchanger.
Solution:
W T
Ta <:  TI
t2 t I,
T
Let us say for the moment that the pinch can occur at
some other location such as shown at the dotted line in the
diagram. Call this pinch temperature T. For convenience,
let all temperatures be absolute (so that they will all be
positive). 'Finally, let W be the larger flow rate, and w the
smaller, so that W >w.
Since each stream consists of water, it is reasonable to
equate the two heat capacities. An energy balance to the
right of the pinch point then gives
W(Ti T) = w(tj T) (1)
or
Ti T w
t, T V
W
But 0 < < 1. Combining with Equation 2 yields
t, T T tI
From this last relationship, either (Ti T) < (ti T) and
both (T. T) and (ti T) are positive, or (T T)<
(T t) and both (T T1) and (T ti) are positive.
Consider the first alternative. Since (TI T) is
positive, TI> T. This means W cools down as it passes
through the exchanger, and so W must be for the hot stream.
(To accept the contrary would obviously violate the Second
Law by having a cold stream cool down further by thermal
contact with a hot stream,) However, canceling T from the
aforementioned inequality which is (TI T) < (t1 T) yields
Ti < ti. This means W is for the cold stream. Obviously,
V cannot represent both the hot stream and the cold stream.
Therefore this first alternative is impossible.
Consider now the second alternative. Here (T Tj) is
positive, so T > TI. This means V warms up as it passes
through the exchanger, and so W must be for the cold stream.
(Again, accepting the contrary would violate the Second Law.)
However, subtracting T from (T T,) < (T tI) which is the
inequality for this alternative, yields Ti< ti or TI> ti.
This means W is for the hot stream. Again, W obviously can
not represent both the cold stream and the hot stream. There
fore this second alternative is also impossible.
Since there are only two alternatives, and both are im
possible, the entire situation is impossible. In other words
we cannot say the pinch occurs at some location along the
exchanger. In fact, it cannot even occur at the lefthand
extremity of the exchanger since we could always write Equa
tion 1 for an energy balance to the right of the pinch.
The pinch must therefore occur at a location to the
right of which we are unable to write an energy balance.
Only the righthand extremity of the exchanger qualifies.
In other words, the pinch must occur at the inlet of the
stream with the larger flow rate.
R. L.
TRANSLATION OF TITLES
Spanish S. Botero
German H. Zimmer
Current Issue: Volume 3, Number 2, December 1965
Estimation of Random Error in a Derived Quantity. 3
Calculo del error "De Azar" en una cantidad
derivada.
Abschatzung von Random Fehlern in einer ab
geleiteten Menge.
Approach to Steadystate of a Two Stage Mixer
Settler Extractor. 11
Aproximacion al estado constant de un ex
tractor de dos etapas tipo mezcladorsedimentador.
Annaherung zum "SteadyState" in einem zweistufen
"MixerSettler" Extractor.
A Projects Laboratory for Junior Chemical Engineers. 17
Un proyecto de laboratories para estudiantes de
tercer ano en ingenieria quimica.
Ein "projects labor" fur Studenten der chemischen
Ingenieurwesen vor dem Vorexamen.
Undergraduate Use of Analog Computers. 22
Uso de "analog" computadores en la universidad.
Gebrauch von Analogrechenmaschinen durch Studenten
erster Semester.
Departmentalized Curriculum Based on Chemical Change. 32
Program para el departamento de ingenieria
quimica basado sobre cambios quimicos.
Studienplan unter Einbeziehung verschiedener
lehrstiihle basierend auf "Chemical Change."
A Common Studies Curriculum in Engineering. 43
Un program de studios comunes en ingenieria.
Ein gemeinsamer Studienplan fMr Ingenieure.
The Undergraduate Curriculum in Chemical Engineering
at Yale. 48
Program de studios basicos para ingenieria
quimica en la universidad de Yale.
Studienplan bis zum Vorexamen fir chemisches In
genieurwessen an der Yale Universitat.
i
I
F
r
i
B
p
r
Ci

Full Text 
PAGE 1
ts Ll foJ Gr THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION Volume 3 Number 2 December 1965
PAGE 3
THE JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION Volume 3, Number 2, December 1965 Editor: Robert Lemlich Associate Editor~ Daniel Hershey Editorial 2 Estimation of Random Error in a Derived Quantity D. A. Ratkowsky 3 Approach to SteadyState of a Two Stage MixerSettler Extractor James E. Halligan and Morton Smutz 11 A Pro j ects Laboratory for Junior Chemical Engineers Sarni Atallah 17 1., Undergraduate Use of Analog Computers W. E. Schiesser 22 D\:. partmenta.lized Curriculum Based on Chemical Change William H. Corcoran 32 . A Common Studies Curriculum in Engineering Eric Weger 43 The Undergra.du~te Curriculum in Chemical Engineering at Yale Charles A. Walker and John A. Tallmadge 48 Miscellany: Solution to Previous Problem Translation of Titles 53 55 The Journal of Chemical Engineering Education is pub lished at irregular intervals at the University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati 21, Ohio, U.S.A. Opinions expressed by contribu tors are their own and do not necessarily reflect those of the editor or the University. Annual subscription: In the U.S.A. and Canada, $2.00; elsewhere, $3.00. Prepayment is requested.
PAGE 4
, . .. : ~' .. : : WE BOW OUT .As we indicated in our previous issue, this journal has been suffering from an unusual malady a shortage of publishable material. We have subscribers but we lack a sufficient number of contributors. As a result our issues have become too few and far between. Accordingly, we have regretfully decided to suspend publication. We do however w~nt to take this final opportunity to thank our subscribers and contributors, our colleagues and friends, and our typists and mimeographers for their sup port, encouragement, and assistance. It is our understanding that the Chemical Engineering Division of the American Society for Engineering Education is presently taking steps to revitalize their divisional publication. We wish them success in this endeavor and urge all our readers to support their effort~. R. L. 2
PAGE 5
ESTIMATION OF RANDOM ERROR IN A DERIVED QUANTITY D. A. Ratkowsky Assistant Pr ofessor, Department of Chemical Engineering The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada ~ '. Abstract: The statistical method for determining the > variance of an arbitrary f'unction of e,xperimentally measured variables deserves to be more generally employed in under graduate laboratory courses to assist the student in evalua ting the errors in, and the reliability of, experimental day~. The statistical method also has an important use in explora: : tory research studies and in process design. In all cases the method leads to an estimate of the probable error in the derived quantity~ whereas an alternative method gives the maximum possible error, which generally represents an overly conservative estimate of the error. The statistical theory of random errors in a quantity which is derived from primary experimental observations, is useful for the estimation of error in at least three classes of problems: 1) The analysis of experimental error, either in research or in undergraduate student laboratory classes, 2) Exploratory research studies, to ascertain whether the method of measuring a particular variable is of sufficient precision, and 3) Process design, where experimental error creates an uncertainty in the magnitude of the quantity to be designed. The statistical method for determining the variance of nn arbitrary function of experimentally measured variables is given in several textbooks (1, 2, 3, 4) which, although not mentioning chemical engineering specifically in their titles, may come to the attention of chemical engineers. There are, however, at least two leading textbooks, both of which are specifically concerned with applications of mathe matical methods to chemical engineering, which do not mention the statistical method. This statistical method, which en3
PAGE 6
ables one to construct confidence intervals for the mean value of the derived quantity, deserves to be better known by t~Bchers of chemical engineering, and more generally em ployed in undergradun.te laboratory courses, to assist in valu~.ting the reliability of the experimental data. Before presenting the statistical method, it is useful to first present an alternative method of determining the propa~ated error. This method, given in several textbooks {5, 6) has the weakness that the error it predicts is the maximum possible error, and takes no account of the possi bility of compensating or cencelling errors. It is based upon the fact that if U = ( x 1 x 2 , xn ) (1) where x 1 x 2 , x are several directly measured vari ables subject to exporimintal error, then the differential change in the derived quantity U for a differential change in each of the measured x's is dU =_Ldx +li_ c:) X 1 1 2J X 2 dx 2 + + a X d.xn n (2) If the errors dx 1 dx 2 , d.x are relatively small, (so that the terms of higher orde in the Taylor ex pansion are negligible), then Equation 2 can be reduced to + + (3) Illustrative examples of the use of this formula are given in reference (5), pp. 5556 and reference (6), PP 359360. One important aspect of the use of Equation 3 is that the sign of the partial derivativ~ is so chosen that all terms of Equation 3 have the same sign, that is, the terms add up in such a way that ~U represents the maximum possible error in the derived variable U. Equation 3 almost certainly overestimates the error involved in the derived quantity, be cause it considers only the simultaneous occurrence of the most extreme errors and takes no account of the possibility of compensating errors. The probability of operating at the most extreme level of error is always small, and becomes van ishingly small as one increases the number of primary vari ables subject to error. The concept of maximum possible error is therefore one of limited usefulness. 4
PAGE 7
' '. f .J '... : ,,. I : Statistical tecl~~ iques lead to a more pertinent m~asure of the error in a de:r;i ved quantity by enabling one to calcu late t he varhmce of the mean value of the derived qua.nti ty. The formula to be used is shown below. If Z = f (x 1 x 2 '.9 x ) ,. where the x. are indepen dent random y:{3,ri : able s with finite means and finite variances, t~en if :t~~ ~rrqrs in the xi are not to~ large (so that the higher o~der terms of the Taylor expansion can be neglected), then one can write The partial der i vati ve of the function f with respect to each \ \. xi is taken '. wfth all the remaining x' s held constant. The quantities
PAGE 8
Here, dne wouid once again require experimentation to obtain a random sample from which : the variance may be estimated. The preyious discussion ; applies only to steady readings where the smallest scale division imposes a. limiting factor on the accuracy of the reading. A special c~se of Equation 4 relation is of the form Z ::: CX 1 a 1 a 1 a 2 , a are constants. by using Equationn4, that o ccurs when the functional a2 an h X2 x were c, Then it is ea.Ry to show, 2 ( i )2 (~ja x 2 n Xn Presented below are two illustrative problems which will indicate the uses to which Equation 4 can be put. IllustrB,ti ve ExamT.>le 1:. _______ ......,. __ ___ __ .. _ ___ .. ~ C 0:2.side:::an u :a dergraduate laboratory experiment on the ( 5) unsteadystate heating of water, starting at room temperature, in a steamjacketted open kettle. The apparent overall heat transfer coefficient is given by where M = C = p A = dt/dG = u a Mc dt = 11... Mt dG a weight of water, lb. heat capacity of water, BTU/lb (F) area of kettle in contact with water through which heat transfer can take p r lace, ft 2 apparent temperature difference between steam and water at any instant, F slope, at any instan t : of the curve of water temperature versus t im e . . Suppose it is desired t:0 : .. deter~ine the value of U and its precision, at ~he condition when 6ta = 60F. a Since this equation is an exampie of the special case quoted abover the expression for ~he variance of Ua, obtained with the aid of Equation 5, is 6
PAGE 9
200 lbs. of water were measured out in 25 lb. batches. Each batch was weighed within maximum error limits of 0.25 lb., i.e. m = 25 0.25 lb. T "" o. 25 ; 0 083 1 t .,........ 0 10 herefore
PAGE 10
Therefore = 1 3 5 = 0.5F s 2 = 0.25 (oF)2 J3 . The water temperature was : ~ measured .. by using the average value of two thermocouples, each thermocou ple indicating between error limits of 0.5F. tw = (1/2)(t + t ) W1 W2 = (l/4)(t 2 + 2) = (2/ 4 )(0 3 5)2 W1 W2 = 0.0138 2 Therefore ~t 2 = 0.25 + 0.01 = 0.26 2 a The derivative of temperature with respect to time at the particular time Q where ~t = 60F was deter mined from the tangent drawn to aaplot of water tem perature versus time. From several trials, consid ering the various possibilities for drawing a smooth curve through the points, and considering the preci sion of drawing a tangent to a curve, a reasonable estimate for the derivative dt/dQ was 3.0 F/min with variance. The average value of the apparent overall heat transfer coefficient, Ua, is obtained to be (200)(1)~3.0~(60) ua (8.74 (60 = 68.6 BTU/(hr)(ft 2 )(F) and the estimated variance to be 8 O":'. 2 u a = < 68 6 > 2 [ <~Og~, +
PAGE 11
I Us~ng this . value of the s t andard deviation of Ua' 95/4 confiderlce limits upon U can be constructed The 11.mi ts are 1.96 (5.18) = 10.2, tht value 1.96 being taken from a tabu lati _
PAGE 12
If we wish to be 95/4 confident that the exchanger will have adequate area (alctua lly the v~lue calculated will repre sent 97. 5 0 confi.dence, since ih fac t a onetailed test is being considered), theh the design area should be A= i~70 + 1.96(84.5) = 1340 ft 2 Had the concept ot ma~imum possible error been used in stead, the design area would have been in the vicinity of 1530 ft 2 Literature Cited: 1. Volk, W., "Applied Statistics for Engineers" McGraw Hill (1958) 2. Davies, O. L., Editor, 11 Statistical Methods in Research and Production" Oliver and Boyd (1957) 3. Parratt, L. G., "Probability and Experimental Errors in Science", Wiley (19 61) 4. Paradine, C. G~ and Rivett, B. H.P., "Statistical t Ne thods for Technologists", English U. Press (1960) .. 5. Hickley, H. S., Sherwood, T. K., and Reed, C. E., nAp plied Nathematics in Chemical Engineering", McGrawHill (1957) .: 6. Jenson, V. G. and Jeffreys, G. V., "Mathema tical Methods in Chemical Engineering" Academic Press (1963) 10
PAGE 13
APPROACH TO STEADYSTATE OF A TWO STAGE MIXERSETTLER EXTRACTOR* ;. : : } _; James E. Halligan, Graduate Assistant,and Morton Smutz, Deputy Director Institute for Atomic Research and Department of Chemical Engineering, Iowa State University .Ames, Iowa Abstract: Under the assumptions of ideal stage bepavior, immiscible solvents, constant flow rates, constant inte'rf : ace : ~ levels, constant distribution coefficients, instantaneous mass transfer and homogeneous phases, it is possible to solv~ the appropriate differential equations simul te.neously 1 a~ 4 ,_. ~;cpr ~ ~~ :. .. the rate of approach of a mixersettler extractor : to t steady""'.' : .,. state as a function of a dimensionless qua.nti ty 1 that involve$ .. the elapsed time and a quantity related to the sys tem capa citance. The particular integral, or steadystate solution, is the familiar equation for the concentration of a solute in a stream as a function of the socalled extraction factor. By introducing solvent extraction theory in this manner, the student develops a better understanding of the dynamics of the system and the realization that the steadystate solution is only a somewhat idealized special case of the general solution. The Differential Equations: . .,. ,! : Figure 1 shows a continuous countercurrent two stage mixersettler extractor with the light solvent L entering from the left and : the heavy solvent H with solute entering from the right. Each box represents an ideal stage made up of a mixer where the two phases are contacted and a settler where the two phases are allowed to separate. There are many commercial types of extractors that are designed in this way (l). Equations 1 and 2 are solute balances made for each stage expressing the rate of accumulation of solute as a function of the rate of solute flowing into and out of the stage. Contribution No. 1445; work was performed in the Ames Laboratory of the U.S. Atomic Energy Commission. 11
PAGE 14
(1) (2) ; : If the flow rates are assumed constant (L 1 = L 2 =Land H 1 = H 2 = H), the distribution coefficient mis assumed con stant, and the entering solvent contains no solute, Equation la and 2a result. The term G is defined as vn + v 1 m ~~Ha will~~ discussed la~er. : I dx1 !I + E}x1, ' dt + G = G : . _.. ~ .. .. '!' (la) dx2 (1 + E)x 2 Ex 1 ~F cit + G = T + G (2a) Solution of the Eguatio~: The simultaneous solution of Equations la and 2a provides a good algebraic workout and results in Equation 3 for a st~pwise change in x at t = O. Such a stepwise change may be thought of as sudEenly switching from a solutefree aque ous stream to an aqueous feed stream after the extractor has reached a hydraulic balance with no solute in the system. [ : l+E+E 2 l .:E G2 j X1 (12(3) By inspection one can see the steadystate solution be cause d~~! and will both equal zero. This expression can be verified independently by making steadystate material balances about the two stages and solving simultaneously. (4) The complementary function can be found by setting the differential equation equal to zero and solving the resulting equation. 12
PAGE 15
0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 y 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 STAGE I Lyo VL LY1 HX 1 VH HX 2 FiQure I 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Z=t/G Floure 2 STAGE 2 VL LY2 VH HXF 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2.0 13
PAGE 16
.., A x F x I i I a= G E b = G l+E C = G +x2 x, Figure 3 +x t x,
PAGE 17
(~ ) The complete solution for x 1 is the sum of the expres. sio.ns in Equations 4 and 5. Boundary condi ti:Ons assumed .~ .were .'. that t = O, x 1 = O, and dx 1 /dt = 0~ After considerabl. e alge br a, Equation 6 appears. Xp .. [ (1 = """1+=E+._,,,,,E.,.. 2 l (l+EEt)t + E + E)e G 2Et + (1 + (l+E+E)t] E Et)e G . I .. 2E 2 . , "' _. l t (6) } : If both sides of Equation 6 a.r e .: dividea by the steady~ state value of x 1 the fractional approach to steadystate Y can p.e determined as a function of E, G and t. tt (l+E+.E!) t (l+EE : ) ~= E + Et)e G .., .i G (1 P+ EE 2 )e y l + + = 2Et 2Ef (' \ 1 ss. .. ) Significance of G: Figure 2 shows the solution to Equation 7 as a function of the dimensionless quantity, Z(Z = t/G) with parameters of E 'l'h e significance of G can be seen by multiplying the nu merator and denominator of the defining equati i on by x . l. (8) The numerator represents the amount of solute in stage i at a given time and the denominator is the amount leaving stage i per unit time in the aqueous stream. In other words, if the numerator is relatively large due to large volumes and a high distribution coefficient, and if the aqueous flow rate 15 (7)
PAGE 18
is relatively smal 1, thell .. QL j_d ;iich is ___ b:~ l ~~e~ r ~
PAGE 19
A PROJECTS LABORATORY FOR JUNIOR b 9HEM1: : ~AL ENGINEERS* Sarni Atallah Associate Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering Tufts University Medford, Massachusetts Abstract: This paper describes the operation of an under graduate chemical engineering laboratory which is in addition to the usual unit operations laboratory but is not a substitute for a research thesis. Small groups of students are assigned different interesting projects and they are required to search the literature, build apparatus, keep a record of their labor atory activities, and present oral and written reports. This laboratory achieves several objectives but best of all, it provide s an outlet for the students I creativity and talents. If God were to prepare an addendum to his ten command ments, this addendum being intended for graduating en gineers in general and chemical engi~eers in particular, it would probably read something like this: Thou shalt be well founded in the basic fields of mathematics, physics and ~ ~petriistry but Thou shalt perform engineering ~~rk and not be a pure scientist. Thou shalt be creative. Thou shalt have the basic tools to tackle a new probl~m and be able to solve it. Thou shalt have the ability to enlist the help of others who art more knowledgeable than thou art. Thou shalt hav~ the ability to use other sources and devices such as a library or a computer and if thou shalt find no help, then thou shouldst Presented at the A.I .Ch.E u.nnual meet?ing in Boston, Decem ber 1964. Publica tiorr r elease wa.s obt ained by the author. 17
PAGE 20
proceed 1 0n thil);e own initi J :l~i ve with conf~dence in thyself, and when thou findest a solution, thou shalt be able to communicate either orally or in writing whatever thou hast found to thy colleagues, superv~sors and the public. According to Mayer (1) and rv i ~iton (2), the chemical in dustry would say "Amenll to this addendum, and "Hallelujah" if the word "economically" were added to these commandments. And in this spirit, about five years ago, the "Projects Laboratory" was introd uced in the normal junior year unit operations course sequence. It had the following objectives: 1. To provide an out let for the student 1 s creativity and talents. 2. To show the student that textbooks are not all there is to know and thus teach him to use ~he library and to search the technical literature. 3. To teach the student the methodology of conducting an organized experimental study. 4. To familiarize the student with the basic machine shop practices. 5. To encourage good oral and written presentations. 6. To show the wide variety of interesting problems that a chemical engineer can get involved with because of his versatile wide background. Before presenting the mechanism and mode of operation of this laboratory and the types of projects pursued, it would be interesting to show where this laboratory falls in our four year undergraduate curriculum at Tufts University. : In order to graduate from Tufts, an eng ineering student must satisfy the requirements in forty cours es of three or four credit hours each. This requires the average student to carry five courses each term. The Freshman year is the same for all engineers. They take two semesters of chemistry, physics, mathematics, graphics, and English Only students desiring to continue in chemical engineer ing must make up their minds at the end of th~ fi rst _ ye~r . _ During the sophomore year a student takes two semesters of physical chemistry, electric circita, mathematics, two ~lec tives in the humanit,ies or soci~l studies, a third semester 18
PAGE 21
of physics and his first course in . che~ical et;ig J~ ~~ring stoichiometry. ..,_, ~ : :' ~! . .:.~The Junior and Senior ye a r p t o ~rains are shown below: ; : Uni.t Opera.tions I Junior Year 4 ,_. *The : rmodynamics I Organic Chemistry Applied Mechanics Hum. or Soc. Study I ; :, ' 4 *Unit Operations II *Thermodynamics II chem. Analysis Applied Mechanics Hum. or Soc. Study 1.Ch : em. Erig. Lab T~chnica~ Elective Hum. or Soc. Study Free Elective 3 3 3 3 6 3 Senior Year Chemical Technology Plant Design Hum. or Soc. Study Elective 4 3 4 4 ,. 3 3 4 6 3 The first projects laboratory is given during the f'.i r~.::t term of the junior year as part of the unit .operations course. It is held one afternoon a week. These afternoons are not ; solely devoted to laboratory work. Two afternoons are devoted to applied mathematics in chemical engineering. Our students at that point seem to be weak in loglog plotting, gr aphical integration, trial and error solutions and slia.e rule manipu lations. An afternoon is devoted to a lecture on the chemical engineering literature and report preparation. Mimeo~raphed notes on the literature and sample long form reports l thesis type) are distributed at that time. Another afternoon is de voted to machine shop practice. Occasionally a plant trip or film may be scheduled. About eight afternoons are spent on the project. During the second term, students perform six ~xperiments in unit operations based on what they have learned.during the first term. These experiments are: distillation, extraction, fluid flow, insulation te~ting, heat exchangers and bbiling. During the first semester of the senior year, a student is given the \ choice of eit~~r doing a B.S. thesis (if he ; qualifies with a C+ or better average) or taking the regular chemical engineering laboratory course. This laboratory '. course consists of six weeks of standard experiments in unit operations : {humidification, drying, evaporation, fil tration 1 Dorr , th,j._pkener and flooding of packed beds). The remainder ~ of the ~9ur se is devoted to more sophisticated group projects. In ado .;i .. tion, ;the students are required to read early in th_~ term a major portion of Wilson's "Introduction to Scientific Research" McGraw Hill, paperback edition, and they are quiz zed on it periodically and a.re expected to use what they learn Courses taught by the department. 19
PAGE 22
. from it in their pr'oj ects. . Operation of the Projects La.borator~: In general, the laboratory is ~ onducted in the following manner. The class is divided into groups of two and the pro jects are assigned to or chosen : by these groups. Within three or four weeks a literature survey is made and a written theoretical report is prepared by the group. In addition, one member of the group presents it orally to the class in 810 minutes. He is graded by his classmates on: Clarity, knowledge of the subject, information transfer, extemporane ousness, diction and poise. The judging sheets with class comments are returned to the speaker. Th group then spends the remainder of the term building an apparatust running ex periments, obtaining data and correlating results. A final group report (of the thesis type) is handed in at the end of the term at which time the second member of the group presents orally the experimental findings and is judged by the class. Typical Projects: The following is a list of projects recently assigned to juniors: 1. Gas Bubbles in LiQuids. Study the effect of inlet conditions on the rate and size of bubbles of air in water. 2. Recovery of Chemicals from the Lunar Crust. Attempt to recover the water of crystallization of ores considered to be on the lunar surface. 3. Rocket Fuel Performance. The performance of a hobby rocket solid fuel is studied in static firings. Specific impulse, total impulse, average thrust, mass ratio, etc., are to be found. 4. Desalination with Solar Energy. Construct a flat collector and test its eff~ciency. In all these projects, the underlined portion was the title of the initial (theoretical) report. A diagram of the proposed apparatus was prepared and checked by the instructor and machinist for feasibility and economy of construction. Generally, the students assembled the apparatus themselves. Each group was required to maintain a laboratory data book which was checked occasionally. The groups met often with the instructor and sought help from the faculty of other de7 partments. As one can see from the titles of these projects, they 20
PAGE 23
are not equivalent to research theses. They do not contri bute new information to human knowledge (although the author must confess that he and other faculty members have occasion ally used the projects laboratory to test a few research ideas) but they leave the student with the impression that he is doing research. There was no problem in searching for project topics. Summers spent in an industrial research laboratory, technical journals, books, other f~culty members and the instruct0r 1 s current research interests have been the usual sources of ideas. The students' reaction has been gratifying. In a ques tionaire given at the end of the first year that we started this laboratory, ill students indicated that it should be con tinued. some felt that they needed more time. Nany worked after hours and during vacations. We feel that the projects laboratory encouraged qualified students to choose a B.S. thesis during the senior year and to do a better job on it. We feel that it has contributed to the increase in the y pumber of our students going on to do graduate work ( 43 /4 over 1 'the past five years) and in general we are sure that this labora tory has made better chemical engineers out of our students. ;l , :. Literature Cited: 1. Mayer, M. W "Industries Views of Current Chemical En fineering Ed~cation", paper delivered at the A.S.E.E. annual meeting, June 1963 2. houlton, R. W., The Trend~ 16:No .. 4, 4, (Oct. 6,. 1964L 21
PAGE 24
UNDERGRADUATE USE OF ANALOG COMPUTERS* . ; \ < .W. E. Schiesser Associa,te Professor, Department of Chemical Engineering Lehigh University Bethlehem, Pennsylvania , . Abstract: Types of problems that can be solved by under graduates employing analog computers are examined. . ~ Introduction: The ava.ilab i1i ty of small electronic analog computers for use by relatively large numbers of students has brought about significant changes in undergraduate education in the Department of Chemical Engj.neering, Lehigh University. This ._ paper is a brief account of our experiencesin the use of analog computers in undergraduate education during the last five years. Operating Procedure: Our experience with analog computation began in 19~0 r l' : with the purchase of an Electronic As sociates, Inc. TR10 20amplifier computer. The initial use of_this computer was somewhat limited because of the lack of programming experience of th'e faculty and the unavai,.lability of removable pat ch pan: : els (i.e. it was necessary to patch a problem directly on the face of the computer and then remove it before another problem could be patched). When the manufacturer did finally provide removable patch panels, the demand for the computer increased sharply to the point where it was no longer adequate. The quantity of computing equipment has increased continually to meet the growing demand and it is anticipated that this trend will continue for some time in the future, although our future purchases may be determined to some extent by the recent de velopments in digital simulation. At present 32 patch panels are available for use by any student in the University. The analog computer laboratory is open 4 or 5 days a week with supervision and is run on an open*Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem ber 1964. Publication release was obtained by the author. 22
PAGE 25
. : . , shop basis~ .A stud.~nt may obtain_ a patch panel, cords, bottle plugs and any other ~elated equipment, patch his problem and run it on a co~puter without completing any paperwork. Upon completion of the problem, the student returns the p anel and components to the central supply area i~ the laboratory. Patch panels may be retained for further computation for a period o f time which ~s determined primarily by the current demand for additional patch panels to start new problem~. When this time during which a patch panel may be retained be comes too short, additional patch panels are purchased. Undergraduates are encouraged to use the analog computer routinely in the solution of assigned problems. The facilities of the computer laboratory are used extensively in under graduate and graduate co~rses in kinetics and reactor design, and process dynamics and c ontrol, an ~dergra duate seminar in mathematical modeling, an introduct oz:y sophomore course i A, analog and digital computation and a senior projects course. The Departments of Mechanicai Engineering, Electricai Engineer ing and Psychology are presently using the analog computer laboratory and it is anticipated that several other de part ments will do so in the near uture. The .Advantages of Analog Computation: Experience has indicated that the following advantages can be attributed directly to'the ayailability of small analog computers: 1. Undergraduates have an opportunity to gain valuable experience in the mathematical modeling of physical systems. In deriving the system equations, they must make use of the basic principles of physics, chemistry and engineering. It is usually necessary for them to decide which phenomena must be taken into consideration in their analysis in orde~ to ar rive at a realistic model and which phenomena can be dismissed as unimportant in contributing to the performance of the sys tem so as to keep the model within manageable proportions. The contributio n of the anal og computer is, of course, that it enables the student to do something useful and practical with the model after it h as been formulated. 2. The programming of an analog computer, in common with all computer programming, requires careful problem form ulation and attention to detail. On the other hand, the com puter enables the student to essentially bypass the details of mathematical analysis required to solve the model. He does not become engulfed in complex mathematical manipulations but instead can proceed directly to the solution. The analog com puter is, of course, particularly valuable for nonlinear prob lems for which there are no known an~lytical methods of solu tion. The effects of system nonlinearities are easily assessZ3
PAGE 26
ed and the limitations of a linearized analysis are soon ap parent. J. The student can experiment with the modeled system and investigate a large number of alternatives in a short per iod of time. In a sense he can optimize the system by trial anderror experimentation on the computer. It is therefore not surprising to find that most students are analog computer enthusiasts, particularly the better stu dents who are strongly oriented towards the analytical approach to engineering problems. An Example: The following simple problem in chemical kinetics illus trates the procedure for programming a problem for analog com puter solution Compute the concentration of A, Band Casa function of time when initially, A= 1 (mol fraction), B = o, C = O*. Consider three cases: k 1 = 0.1, k 2 = l; k 1 = 0.25, k 2 = 0.25; k1 = 1, k 2 = 0.1 (sec1 ). 1. State the equations, initial conditions and parameters. The equations should be arranged to give the highest order de rivatives explicitly. 1.1 Firstorder kinetics *We refer to this as the "Piel's Beer" problem k1 k2 Green beer~ Piel's Beer~ Stale beer The objective then is to catch the "Piel' s Beer at its p"eek." 24
PAGE 27
I 1.2 Secondorder kinetics d.A/dt = k1A 2 ;: 1. d.B/dt = k 1 A~ :k 2 B 2 i ,, i Initial conditions: A(O) = 1, B(O) = O, C(O) = 0 Par ameters: I k1 = 0.1, k2 = 1 II k1 = 0 .. 25, k2 = 0.25 III k = 1, k2 = 0.1 ~ .' .. 2. Magnitude scale the equations. The output of any operational amplifier in the computer ,; s f!.ould not exceed the reference voltage( 10v in the case of an EA.I TR10 or TR20) or be so small that the computing accuracy is poor. It is therefore necessary to scale all of the dependent vari ables of the equations so as to keep the voltages represen ting these variables in the proper range. In this case scaling is quite easy since the dependent variables are all mol fractions with a maximum value of 1 which immediately suggests a scale factor of 10. If square brackets [ ] are used to represent a scaled variable (i.e. a voltage in the computer), the original equations can be scaled as: Firstorder Kinetics d[lOA]/dt = k 1 [10.A.] d [10B] /dt = k 1 [10A] k 2 [10B] d [10c] /dt = k 2 [10B] Secondorder Kinetics (1) (2) (3) d[loa]/dt = k1 [10A] 2 /10 (4) d[lOB]/dt = k 1 [10A] 2 /10 k 2 [10B] 2 /10 (5) 25
PAGE 28
d [ l OC] /d t = k 2 [1 OB] 2 /10 [10.a(O)] = 10 (6) 3. Draw the computer circuit diagram. The circuit for the solution of Equations 1, 2, and 3 is given in Figure 1 and for Equations 4, 5, and 6 in Figure 2. 4. Time scale. In this case the setting of potentio meters 1 and 2 (i.e. the values of k 1 and k 2 respectively) are reasonable and therefore time scaling is not required. Thus problem time and computer time are the same. If the rate constants for Case I had been k 1 = 0.001, k 2 = 0.01, potentiometers 1 and 2 could still be set to 0.1 and 1 re spectively and the computer would run 100 times faster than the physical system. On the other hand if the rate constants had been k 2 = 100, k 2 = 1000, potentiometers 1 and 2 could be set to 0.1 and 1 respectively and the computer would run 1000 times slower than the physical system. These considerations can be generalized: The inputs to all integrators can be changed by a constant factor in order to arrive at reason able potentiometer settings and loop gains without changing the solution. The ratio of problem time to computer time equals this constant factor. In a sense then, time scaling takes care of itself quite naturally. 5. Static check. A static check is analogous to a hand calculation used for debugging a digital computer pro gram. It is indispensable for the successful operation of an analog computert particularly when the amount of time each problem is on the computer is to be minimized. The static check will detect most programming errors and computer components which are not operating properly. In the present easer the following voltages should ap pear at the outputs of the indicated amplifiers before the computer is put into operation: Amplifier Output 1 +lOv 2 0 3 0 4 0 26
PAGE 29
Figure 1. Analog Computer Circuit for Linear Kinetics. lOv 1 1 1 1 1 Figure 2. Analog Computer Circuit for Nonlinear Kinetics. ,(!_o~ 2 /10 ka 1
PAGE 30
I 1 I \ \ 1 I \ \ I \ I I \ I I I I I I ,r. W+.Wl1Wlll!+l1+IH++H++'\IH++H++l++Hf\,+HtH~tH::c~titTrll'S'. H+H++H++tt1 I I :C ID \ I O::::i:::J~t{i~ii_t{1~ 4l_li1+4tii~t+lii+~++ii+j:1\ii~+1ti+f++tt~V/t+tl+ft 1 fttifff 1 +ltt+t+t7 if4ttit+t_tt7 fttiit+1"it""1fftt7 tr 1t+++rrl 1 1 _.wi1w1tW+l1+IHl+f++.\ 1 c!!+IH++!h jlH++H +~ 1 4HH+ t t tttHtrlHrtih1tl11t1 \ \ I 11M 111+l+l+IH++H++tr1~...J. H_ 11r: 1 1+1+++++HHtHt+H+nttr 1 ..rr, ~' 1~++f++,+1 t +++, ~'+1+ttf++++++tt1Ul\ I . ':Jt4~Jll l\....J..l+l1H++H+++ +H++l t+lt ::: d::: c / ~ ~ w.. 1 iwA, 1 1 .J..l.11 .\l +...lJ II H H ++f+ lhH+Ht+itli;;,l,ltJ 1+....:.,., l ..!.+ll cll+IH+++++HHtHt+tttti r1 .J.: 1 l l++ +Hlh4Htl\HtH ll+l+1H#+Ht+H++l=tt1 '~ _J ~1Mlt+lf+ ++l'++Hfl 1 ~ 1++ l+ t ttHt+tlr+Htttir:r,H ..:, I \ J I I I\ 1 l+...J.1+~+l'l++++++cr++tttt+ttHrtt l tl = + ; / ~J.\ ._.)._ ,.J.. J_ ) !.)... llf1..j.......j.J.\.l\ ++ 1l+l1H+l +++++tt+t++tn ,, i ~ IH H 1 +ltt++ltltl ++++HH+HHtt+,v.+ttt+itt+ : I ll++++!++H++HF~'"9,H+Ht+H : I +H+Hf+1+4++H+Hf+!..+'\K\l\+Hl++H+Hf+fl +l+t++H++t++ufltHHIH++H1 1 1; : ; i : 1 1+!ti+++f++t+++ttlt++.,...,t\ft\+t'+++tt++++t ++111+H+++++v~"'+Hl+++++++tt++l F I ~1+ ++t+1tt+'++4+++.+1t'+l1~'ll'1 .. 1+.+1t1++++f ++H+Hc+!+i, + ~+HtHttH+H+tt: : t ~ ~ ~H~(i,.J. ~ ...... .+.la ~ .1.ti'1b11c++l++H++f+++l++'~~c\l+++H+Ht+lr, \ ot so 9"0 to io 0 28
PAGE 31
I I ,,.. .. ifi c t: ... .. ... .. I .Ji rT "" .. \ I I I I I 1 I I I I u ,. 1 \ I \ I I I I \ I I \ I \ I I I I \ \ I u C\1 \ \ I ... I I I I I 1... 1 \ 11 \ + I I I +r_j _ i++I I .. .. _I U ~ I r .. r .. LL ' I ll \ i i r = ~ \ (j 4 ; I I r '.~ r l '' i 1_ : 1 ;I I I '\ I i \ I I! I I I ., '\ l I rt I I l I I I \ I .. \ ,.:; I\. I I J 0C \ \ I \ I I \ '' \ I '\ I I '\ I I I \ 1, I I\. I / \ "' I I I / ' / i, \ I'/ I I.I' \ / I'\ I '1. / 1 I ' "'I \ I/ \ ,, \ \ \ V i, ' ,, ; "' \ V ',, I J ,, / ,,,, I\ I ,,~ ... I :'\ ,,._ LA I"' .... .... ..,. \' T f" .... C: 9 0 29
PAGE 32
1 1 t=t:j~t tt=t~= l=t++ ~= ~t+ 1 ~ ~~~~tt =f~~j I 1 ++++H ...;. "HrtHtttH : )0 s:: i CJ I J I 9 I 0 I I\ 1 00 I\ I \ \ . ~ f, o 0 0
PAGE 33
A more complete check can be made by artifically introducing an initial condition into each integrator and by summing the inputs used to form the highestorder derivative in each equation (the inputs to amplifiers 1 and 2 in this case). This sum can then be checked against the values of the high estorder derivatives computed directly from the system equations. 6. Run the problem and document the results. Since i t is possible to rapidly generate a large number of solu tions in a short period of time, it is essential to document these solutions as they are obtained. The solutions to the present problem as they appeared on the xy plotter are given in Figures 3, 4 and 5. This kinetics problem is especially simple from the point of view of magnitude and time scaling. The author has put together several small linear and nonlinear prob lems with detailed solutions which illustrate the more typi cal complexities of scali~g. These problems are available upon request. 31
PAGE 34
DEP.h.RT:t,'iENTALIZED CURRICULUM BASED ON CHEMICAL CH.ANGE* William H. Corcoran Professor of Chemical Engineering California Institute of Technology Pasadena, California . ;:,_ Abstract: Departmentalized curriculum based on chemical change is defined. Then, better building upon highschool pre paration to keep a 4year undergraduate program in chemical engineering is discussed. Emphasis is placed upon the need to prevent proliferation of courses and work in the presence of the continual acceleration in the growth of knowledge. Argument is given in favor of teaching principles and develop ing abilities to think, with the belief that the best type of men will agressively and successfully co~tinue to treat their own technological gaps. The need for continual analysis of curricula is reviewed. Suggestions are given for improved teaching of chemical principles in the early part of the chem ical engineering program and for a new attack to chemical en gineering design in the senior year. In a discussion of a departmentalized curriculum in chem ical engineering, or any branch of engineering, the first thing to consider is what is meant by departmentalized curri culum relative to a general engineering curriculum. There could be many definitions, but one choice would distinguish between the two by noting that the departmentalized curriculum would provide the opportunity for the B.S. graduate to be pre pared properly for specialized or semispecialized employment after four years of undergraduate education. A departmental ized curriculum based on chemical change would have 15 to 20 per cent of the program devoted to appropriate courses in chemistry. The generalized curriculum would not give signi ficant specialized preparation, and at least another year of study would be required to providethe student with the neces sary professional tools to begin specialized employment. After one has considered the meaning of departmentalized curriculum, the next act could logically be the asking of why be concerned about that curriculum when a generalized four*Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem ber 1964. Publication release was obtained by the author. 32
PAGE 35
year program with one or two ; years, of J: : gir r aduate study in pro fessional subjects would certainly give a sound t raining : f : or the first professional degree. The response is threefold: 1. We are less stimulated to significant changes in cur ricula if we are just allowed to extend course work. T,he fouryear program for the first professional de gree demands significant and continuous revision in order to provide the most uptodate training and educatipn in a restric:ted time schedule. 2. Tui tio : n: charges in at least the private schools con tinue to rise. For example, in 196566, the yearly tuition at the California Institute of Technology will be *1800. The increase of one or two years in the progr~m for the first professional degree adds significant educational expenses for tuition and other charges. 3. Space needs are always critical in universities. The addition of 25 to 50 per cent in curriculum time means increased facilities. Should money be put into that area tir should it be put into efforts on improved teaching, better linking of research and teaching, and related fields? The professional training of a chemical engineer is prob ably less tractable in the framework of a generalized curri culum for preparatory work than for other engineering profes sions. The chemical engineer is marked by his particular concern with the economic control of chemical reactions for the benefit of mankind in either defense or nondefense work. As a chemical engineer, and not just as an engineer, he must know about the subtleties of chemical reactions that are not just simply handled by writing chemical rate equations in com binations with transport equations to design chemical reactors. For example, if he is to maximize his ability to program the best type of knowledge into a computer, it is now desirable and becoming necessary that he have some understanding of the movements of electrons in the framework of chemical reactions. He cannot afford to wait too long in his college work to get the background that will allow him to think in chemical terms. That background would include a significant amount of train ing in physical chemistry, chemical kinetics, inorganic chem istry, and organic chemistry. If that work were left in the main to the latter professional part of a training program, more than a year of work after a fouryear program would be necessary for the chemical engineer The man would be well trained, no doubt, but in consideration of time and money would the gain be necessary relative to the needs of the em ployer or to those of the man himself in any subsequent gradu ate work? 33
PAGE 36
A departmentalized curriculum to prepare a man for spec ialized professional performance after four years of under graduate work appears to be a continuing possibility. The possibility seems very desirable in these days of increasing tuition and of increasing ability of entering freshmen. Rather than to think that we must increase our training at the under graduate level and move toward a generalized engineering pr gram in that period of development~ we should look closely at our educational techniques and be willing to make significant changes in our teaching program in order to provide an educa tion in a specialized way in four years. There is a tendency today to believe that as progress adds to our armamentarium of technical ideas and methods at a high rate we must communi cate a large portion of this fund of knowledge to the student before he receives even his first degree. Instead of that concern we should emphasize the development of the thinking abilities of the student. We should be more selective in our teaching and spend more time on principles and less time on technological details. The principles can certainly be taught in the framework of technology, but the technology really should serve mainly as a matrix for the development of the an alytical abilities of the students. As a student develops his thinking powers and interest in his own selfeducation, he should experience no particular difficulty in continually fill ing in the crevices in his knowledge with technical details that are evolving day by day. :; Te have not really exploited the abilities of freshmen entering from themany excellent high schools in the United States. Even though the students have been exposed to im proved courses in mathematics, physics, and chemistry in the high school, we have not done etiough in pr~viding those courses with an engineering flavor to exploit fully the opportunity to optimize the preparation of the man who is to become a fresh man in an engineering college. The lack of integrated effort between engineering educators and highschool departments of science and mathematics is a challenge that is especially di rected to us who favor the concept of a departmentalized cur riculum based upon chemical change. The simplest way to focus thoughts on curriculum is to be specific, and so a fouryear program for the near future is proposed which would continue to provide the high level of education we have today, would accommodate for the increasing ly exciting additions to knowledge and methods, and would al low the graduate from that program to work for any chemical industry and perform well in operations and possibly develop ment work or enter graduate work in chemical engineering in the best schools in the United States. Humanities training would be about 20 per cent of the curriculum and electives bout 10 per cent. J4
PAGE 37
Table 1 shows the proposed curriculum. The data are shown for a quarter system with three terms in the academic year of 9 months. The units not~d in t~e table represent the total number of class and home hou rs p er week assigned to the different subjects. Conversion of units to semester hours is accomplished by multiplying by 2/9. Overall percentages of time devoted to a given area of effor~ are more meaningful, and are shown in the summary Table 2. Table 3 gives the cur rent program at the California Institute of Technology, and in Table 4 there is a summary of the det~ils in Tabh~ 3. A comparison of the proposed and current curricula shows two major changes. First, the new proposal calls for a new course in chemistry for the first and second years. It would be a systematized integration of physical chemistry, inorganic chemistry, and organic chemistry in place of the current se parate courses in quantitative chemistry, organic chemistry, and physical chemistry. Sufficient progress has been made in the development of quantitative organic chemistry that such integration seems possible. Not only would the course be taught to chemical engineers, but strong consideration should be given to its inclusion in all engineering and science courses to improve the scientific literacy of the undergraduate. The second major change is the proposed senior course in chemical engineering design. In the suggested curriculum, the student at the end of his junior year would be well trained in many aspects of applied mathematics and able to move more rapidly in the parts of design work concerned with applied mechanics than if the applied mechanics had been taken at a lower level of training. Therefore there is some logic in suggesting a significant course in chemical engineering design which would bring together stoichiometry, industrial chemistry, economics, applied mechanics, and strength of materials with the student's knowledge of :transport phenomena at a given time in the senior year. Electives would be available for the senior year in areas such as electrical engineering, applied mechanics, and other technical fields. The electives courses would be selected ac cording to the developing interest of the student relative to graduate school or industrial work. In the suggested curricu lum, significant education in principles of chemistry, physics, mathematics, and engineering would be allowed. Only parts of current technology would be presented to the chemical engineer in his first four years, and they would be more concerned with explaining principles than with just technological knowledge for its own sake. The student would be expected to have pre pared himself, however, to think clearly in the attack of new problems and to have the courage to work on these problems even in the face of failure. His technological development would be a continuing part of his graduate and subsequent profession al study or of his professional work alone. 35
PAGE 38
. In stunmary, a seven.,.point p rogram is : suggested for insuring a highquality departmenta1ized curriculum in chemical ehgineering to be given in four:: years and to have chemical change ~s the main basis for its : differentiatioa from general engineering. The seven points are: , 1. Continue with a strong effort to teach why. Worry less about all technology and focus more on use of new technology to illustrate old and new principles. 2. Build more carefully upon the greatly improved edu cation in high school. 3. Work to introduce more engineering thinking into the problems and laboratory assignments in highschool science and mathematics. 4. Introduce more engineering problems and attitudes in to the lowerdivision college courses in mathematics, physics, : : and chemistry, and integrate that effort with th e upperdi vision engineering courses. 5. Introduce a new twoyear chemistry course in which physical chemistry, inorganic chemistry, and organic chemistry have been systematically combined in place of the often~used threeyear program of separate gen eral and quantitative chemistry, organic chemistry, and physical chemistry. 6. Introduce a thirdyear course in quantum mechanics and statistical mechanics with carefully prepared applications in the gaseous, liquid, and solid states. 7. Build more carefully in the fourth year on the advanced principles developed in the first three years. Use fewer units to cover work more intensively. Speci fically, introduce a new senior course in chemical engineering design to encompass work in stoichiometry, industrial chemistry, economics, applied mechanics, and strength of materials. The above steps as they pertain to college work are achievable even in the presence of 20 per cent of the curriculum devpted to Humanities and 10 per cent to electives. 36
PAGE 39
Table 1 Proposed FourYear Undergraduate Course in Chemical Engineering First Year (Same for all Science and Engineering Students) Mathematics Physics Chemistry English History Graphics History Mathematics Physics Chemistry Units per term 1st 2nd 3rd Calculus, Vector Algebra, Analytic Geometry, Infinite series 12 Kinematics, Particle Mechanic~ and Electric Forces 12 Physical Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, and Organic Chemistry ........... ... . . . . . 12 En~lish Literature 6 History of European Civilization . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Basic Graphics Second Year History and Government of the United States Calculus (functions of several variables), Probability, Vector Analysis, Group Theory, Differ ential Equations, Numerical 3 50 6 Analysis . . . . . . . . 12 Electricity, Fields, and Atomic Structure 12 Physical Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry, Organic Chemistry. 12 Electives in Scien~e ani/or 9 51 12 12 12 6 5 47 6 12 12 12 9 51 12 12 12 6 5 47 6 12 12 9 51 37
PAGE 40
English Economics Table 1 (Continued) Third YE i' ar Advanced Literature ............... Economic Principles and Problems Units per 1st 2nd 8 8 6 Electrical Electronics and Circuit Theory 10 Engineering Advanced Physical Chemistry Cher.ii cal Engineering Chemical Engineering Mathematics Humanities History Quantum Mechanics, Statistical Mechanics, Applications to solids, liquids, and gases (solid state theory, plasmas, etc.) Gomputer programming as applied to chemical engineering problems Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics, Applied Chemical Thermodynamics Engineering Mathematics, Mathemati cal treatment of problems in En~ gineering Chemistry and Physics, Complex Variables, Series, Partial Differential Equations~ Boundary Value of Problms, Integral Transforms ............ .. .............. Fourth Year Humanities E lectives Public Affairs Transport Unit Operations Kinetics ......................... C h emical Engineering Laboratory Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Engineering Chemical Chemical Engineering Design (Process Engineering design and study of strength of ma terials and elasticity applied to process components in framework of industrial chemistry and economics} Electives Free Electives 38 10 10 12 50 9 2 12 9 10 10 52 10 3 10 12 49 9 2 12 9 10 10 52 term 3rd 8 6 10 3 10 12 49 9 2 12 9 10 10 52
PAGE 41
~able 2 Pe~~entage Distribution of Time in ~roposed FourYear Undergradu ate Pr ogram :i,n Cheinic a.l Engineer~ng Mathematics Physics Chemistry Chemical Engineering Free Electives Elec~rical Engineering Science and Engineering Electives Graphics Humanities Per Cent of Time 18.0 12.0 16.9 21.4 5.0 1.7 4.5 0.5 20.0 39
PAGE 42
Table 3 Current Underg:t'aduate Course :i,p. Chemical E~ gineering at the California Institute of Technology First Year (Common to all Curricula) Units per term 1st 2nd 3rd Ma l abc Calculus, Vector Algebra, Analytic Geometry .................... 12 Ph 1 abc Kinematics, Particle Mechanics, and Electric Forces l~ Ch 1 abc General and Quanti tatiy~ Ch~mistry . ~2 En 1 abc English Literature , : 6 H 1 abc History of European Civilization Gr 1 Basic 5 3 50 Second Year H 2 abe History and Government of the United States ............................ 6 Ma 2 abc Sophomore Mathematics 12 Ph 2 abc Electricity, Fields, and Atomic Structure . . . . . . . . . . . 12 Ch 41 abc Basic Organic 10 Ch 46 ab Basic Organic Chemistry Laboratory. Electives in Science and/or Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 49 40 12 12 12 6 s; 47 6 12 12 4 6 9 49 12 12 12 6 5 47 6 12 12 4 6 9 49
PAGE 43
En Ee Table 3 ( C.ont.) . ~. Tb:ird Year 7aoc Advanced Literature ........... ; .. 4ab Economic Principles and Problems Ch 14 Quantitative Analysis Ch 2labc Physical Chemistry Ch 26ab Physical Chemistry Laboratory Units per term 1st 2nd 3rd 8 10 .. 9 8 6 8 6 9 8 GhE 63ab Chemical Engineering Thermodynamic~! : 9 AM 95abe Engineering Math~ma tics ., . 1,2 9 8 6 12 12 43 Fourth Year Humanities Electives . . . . . . . H 5abc Public Affairs ME 55 Adaptive Design ChE 6lab Industrial ChE 64 Applied Chemical Thermodynamics ChE 66ab Transport ChE 67ab Chemical Engineering Laboratory ChE 73 Unit 48 9 2 9 9 12 49 9 2 9 12 9 9 2 9 9 12 610 610 610 4751 4751 4751 *If an electrical engineering course in electronics and cir cuit theory is not elected in the sophomore year, the adviser will strongly recommend its inclusion in the senior year. 41
PAGE 44
Table 4 Percentage Distribution of Time in Current Undergraduate Program in Chemical Engineering at the California. 42 Institute of Technology Mathematics Physics Chemistry Chemical Engineering Free Electives Mechanical Engineering Design Science or Engineering Eiectives Graphics Humanities Per Cent of Time 18.5 12.3 20.3 16.4 5.1 1.5 4.6 0.51 20.5
PAGE 45
," I .,; :. A COMMON STUDIES CURRICULUM IN ENGINEERING* : ... ~ i .' f Eric W~ger Chairman, Department of Chemical Engineering Washingt~n University St. Louis, Missou ~ j .,. . .. ,i : . Abstract: The common stud l, es program in engineering at Washington Universi ty is discussed from the viewpoint of the chemical engineering curr~culum. The courses in engineering soience and applied mathematics taken by all engineering un dergraduates a.re dis cussed first. The three courses speci fically oriented toward chemical engineering a.re descri : b~d and special empha sis is given to a new senior course which has the objective of acquainting the students with p~ocess design problems~ . } . The Common Studies Program was put into effect in our Engineering School at Washington University in the fall of 1962. The program is based on the belief that there is a basic body of knowledge in science, mathematics, and the engineering science a which anyone in engineering should possess regardless of their specialty. The program consists of 79 units (or credits, a unit being 1 semester hour of a course, or 2 lab hours) of courses. Of the 79, 52 are taken in the Arts and Sciences College, the ones listed a.s "General" in Table 1. The other 27 a.re taken in the field of Engineering Sciences. As can be seen from Table 2, the crriculum for Chemical Engineering in the first two years COJlSist solely of common studies courses. The one exception for Chemical Engineering students is that they must take a more comprehensive second semester of general chemistry as a prerequisite to the addi tional chemistry they have to take later on. This permits a choice of a specific engineering field to be put off until the student is well into his second year. We feel this to be desirable, since the average incoming freshman usually has no basis for making a.n intelligent choice in this matter. Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem ber 1964. Publication release was obtained by the author. 43
PAGE 46
, . . One of the fields i'n which we thought all engineering students should obtain a comparable background was applied mathematics. The details of the common studies program in mathematics courses can be seen in Table 2. After three semesters of Calculus gi::ven by the Mathematics Department, the students begin their applied math s equence in the Engineering School. Two semesters of classical applied mathematics (called Analysis I and II to appease the mathematicians) pres ent or dinary and partial differential equations, vectors, complex variables, operational methods, Fourier s eries, etc. The techniques of "setting up" problems for mathematical solution are heavily emphasizedt especiallyin the first semester. The course entitled "Numerical Methods'' in the junior year is en tirely computer oriented. The students become acquainted with computer techniques and simple programming. They are encour aged in all their subsequent courses to make use of the com puter whenever it might be of help to them. They punch their own programs and batches are run off three times a day on Was hi.~gto~ Vniversi ty' s IBM 7072 computer. The Statistics course completes the sequence. ; Among the other engineering science common studies courses, the Thermodynamics course is probably of special interest to Chemical Engineers. It is, of course, not possible nor desir able perhaps, to cover some of ; the specifically chemical en gineering aspects of therrriodyn : atnics in the core course. These are taken up in the subsequent Elements of Chemical Engineer ing Course. This bringi us to the specialized Chemical Engineering part of the program. First of all, there are, of course, additional chemistry courses. I might say here that the po sition of these courses is not the optimum from our viewpoint. This is especially so with respect to Physical Chemistry. We would like to see this in the curriculum somewhere before the senior year. However, we are constrained by the fact that the Chemistry Department teaches it definitely on a senior level. Consequently some of the physical chemistry topics which Chem ical Engineering students need for their senior design course have to be taught by _us ; ,_ .: , There are actually 1 only three undergraduate courses tat!:ght by the Chemical 1 Engineering Department. The first is a Transport Phenomeri'a cour se and its associated laboratory. This is a full year course. The text by Bird, Stewart, and Lightfoot is used in the lectures and the laboratory manual by Crosby is followed to a large extent in the Lab. The next Chemical Engineering cdurse is the Elements of Chemical En gineering course ~ '' Thfi:i course is a very intensive one semes44
PAGE 47
ter presentation of basic stoichiometry, some of the chemical engineering aspects ,, of thermodynamics, and the fundamentals of kinetics. To do al1 this in one semester, we have allotted 4 lecture hours and a 2 hour problem working session per week to the course. i The course listed as Process Analysis and Design in the fourth' y_ear of the Ch~mical Engineering curriculum is being taughrt, f or the first time during the 196465 academic year. The : obj : ective of this course is to acquaint the student with and give: him some practice in the various aspects of chemical process design. You must keep in mind that up to this point the student has not been brought into contact with the tradi tional unit operations, reactor design, economicst or design problems. The senior Process Analysis course must, therefore, cover some of the important aspects of all of these topics. We have also found it necessary to include some additional material on vaporliquid equilibria, estimation of properties and mass and energy balances. The design aspect of the course is being handled by taking up a series of 11 ease studies". The present plan is to have bout halfadozen of these. The problems presented to the students will he progressively more sophisticated and diffi cult. As an example I might cite the first case study which was handed out to our seniors. It is a project to produce a "Preliminary Design and Economics Evaluation of Processes for Producing Cyclohexane from Benzene". Both gas and liquid phase processes are to be explored. The students, paired in teams of two and three,have been given about four weeks to come up with a Tentative Process Report. For this first pro ject they are being given a great deal of assistance in loca ting sources of property data, outlining of process flow sheets, etc. In the later studies they will be expected to do more of this themselves. We are planning c~se studies to cover some of the newer aspects of chemical engineering, such as biochemical and aerothermochemical engineering, as well as the more traditional processes. Concurrently with work on their case studies, the students are attending lectures on continuous and stagewise processes, reactor design, and process economics. One of the four units assigned to the course is for one laboratory period or problem working session per week. This period will be utilized during the second semester for a ten week series of sessions on pro cess control (both lecture and lab) and also some additional laboratory work with equipment such as distillation columns 1 which were not encountered in the Transport Phenomena Labora tory. 45
PAGE 48
Th~ big problem i n ttjis cdurife fs to present the ~at erial in such a way that it tie~ in meaningfully with the mai:ier'ial in the basic and engineer1n g sciences which the student s have had in their first three years. I think, on the basis of our present limited experience, that so far we are succeeding. In conclusion, I would say that I believe that we have achieved as good a balance as is possible of analysis and syn thesis in our curriculum of chemical engineering courses tied in with a common studies program. I feel that this curriculum will be suitable both for the terminal Bachelors man as well as the prospective graduate student. 46 Table 1 Washington University School of Engineering and Applied Science Common Studies Program General English Composition Chemistry Physics Mathematics Electives* Engineering Sciences 6 8 8 12 18 52 Mechanics 6 Electrical Sciences 7 Thermodynamics J Engineering Analysis'lt* 11 27 *Recommended courses include languages, literature, econ omics, historyr sociology, psychology, philosophy, and political science. ~Includes statistics and an introduction to digital com puters.
PAGE 49
. Tab"ie 2 Washington University Curriculum in Chemical Engineering FIRST YEAR FALL SEMESTER Units SPRING SEMESTER Units Phys. 117 Gen. Physics 4 Phys. 118 Gen. Physics 4 Math. 116 Calculus I 4 Math. 215 Calculus II 4 ECMP 101 Eng. Comp. J ECMP 102 Eng. Comp. 3 Humanity Electives 36 Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band (1) Humanity Electives 36 Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band (l} 1417 1417 SECOND YEAR Math. 216 Calculus III 4 Engr. 211 Analysis I 3 Chem. 111 Gen. Chem. 5 Chem. 112 Gen. Chem. 5 Engr. 213 Networks I 3 Engr. 214 Networks II 3 Engr. 219 Networks Lab. 1 Engr. 231 Iviechanics I 3 Engr. 232 Mechanics II 3 Humanity Elective 3 Humanity Elective 3 Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band ( 1) Phys. Ed., ROTC or Band (1) 18 18 THIRD YEAR Engr. 365 Num. Methods 2 Engr. 325 Statistics 3 Engr. 320 Thermodynamics 3 Engr. 312 Analysis II 3 Engr. 358 Elems. of Ch.E. 5 Engr. 367 Transport Phen. 3 Engr. 368 Transport Phen. 3 Engr. 373 Trans. Phen. Lab 2. Engr. 374 Trans. Phen. Lab 2 Chem. 241 Quantitative 4 Chem. 254 Organic 5 17 18 FOURTH YEAR Engr. 477 Proc. Anal. and Engr. 478 Proc. Anal. and Design 4 Design 4 Chem. 421 Physical 3 Chem. 422 Physical 3 Chem. 431 Physical Lab. 1 Chem. 432 Physical Lab. l Humanity Elective 03 Humanity Elective 03 Technical Electives 6 Technical Electives 6 1417 1417 Total number of units: 133 47
PAGE 50
I THE UNDERGRADUATE CURR :E CULUM . IN CHEMICAL ENG !NEERING AT YALE* Charles A Walker, Pr of essor ind John A. Tallmadge, A ~sociate Professor Department of Engineering and Appli ed Science la.le University New Haven, Connecticut In a reorganizatio ~ in July 1962, the Department of En gineering and Applied Science was created at Ya.le to replace to a large extent the School of Engineering. The degree of Bachelor of Science is offered by the Department a.s a part of Yale College and degrees of Mas ter of Science and Doctor of Philosophy are offered through the Yale Graduate School. In making the transition from a School to a Department it was necessary to adopt the general requirements of Yale College fo r the bachel or' s degree. These requirements include as one feature a. program for distribution of s tudies. This program of distribution requires every student to elect a full year course or two term courses in each of the following fields: (1) English; (2) a foreign language at the second year level; (3) history; (4) social studies; (5) the natur al sciences; (6) philosophy; (7) a second course in natural science or mathematics at the secondyear level or a course in literature in a foreign langu~ge. Since requirements (5) and (7) are met automatically by students in Engineering a.nd Applied Science programs, this means that at least five year courses of the twenty normally taken must be in fields other than scienc e, mathematics and engineering. The curriculum is so arr:anged that as many as eight courses may be taken outside those fields. Other features of the Yale scene should be borne in mind in considering the curriculum pattern for chemical engineering. One of the most important of these is the fact that most of the students graduating f~om Yale College receive the degree of Bachelor of Arts in the humanities. The Class of 1965, for example, includes about 800 candidates for degrees in the humanities, 110 for degrees in the natural sciences and 50 for degrees in engineering and appli~d science. Our students thus carry on their engineering studies in a community in *Presented at the annual A.I.Ch.E. meeting in Boston, Decem ber 1964. Publication release wm obtained by the authors. + Current address: Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, England. 48
PAGE 51
~ ) : : (. , : .. : . , .) :. . . . : ,y , \ > , : ~ j: : \ .t ; : J, ; which the humanities are dominant and this has : b o : ~ h : ~d f anta : ges and disadvantages. Our students ., benefit from 1?ije higl f : qua.li ty o.f 2 .eachiug in th e humanities and ac qui t theni1;:1elves well in c ompetition with students in other majors. However, as Astin (Science, illr 3348 (1963)]. has pointed out, sch an environ ment, characteristic of several of the Nortlieasterri: men Is : collegesJ has a decidedly negative eff~c~ ~ o~ the ~t~den\'s decision to pursue a career Jn s cience and his conclusions probably also apply to engin eeri ng students. That is to s ay, it is a characteristic of Ye.le and other schools in this group that a Freshman planning to enter the field of science is more likely to be dissuaded from this choice than he would in other schools. A second factor which should b.e borne in mind is the ori entation of Yale students after graduation. Over twothirds of Yale graduates enter graduate or professional schools. For example, 649 of the 956 ; members of the Class of 1964 en tered into advanced study and a sizeable number (280) of these chose law and business schools. This trend of graduates to the enterprising professions is also seen among graduates from programs offered by the Department of Engineering and Applied Science. Of the graduates of this Department in 1964, more than onefourth entered law schools and business schools; the others were evenly divided between graduate school in en gineering and science and industrial positions. In terms of size, th e Department of E ngineering and Ap plied Science with fiftythree faculty members is somewhat smaller than the Department of English or the Department of History and is about the same size as the Department of Physics .. In addition to the 5070 undergraduate students per year re ceiving degrees, this Department also has in residence about 30 candidates for the degree of Master of Science and 120 candidates for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. This, then, is the framework within which the program in chemical engineering is planned and administrated. It is a program characterized by flexibility, a feature which is con sidered to be essential in view of the factors discussed above. The Department of Engineering and Applied Science is not formally broken into subgroups representing the traditional fields of engineering nor into subgroups according to other patterns such as the engineering sciences. The Department of some 50 faculty members is small enough that subgroups may not be as necessary as they would be in schools which have many more faculty members. This is not to say that subgroups do not exist. They form naturally according to common inter ests but they no longer have fo rmal status. There is, for example, a natural subgroup of faculty members with primary 49
PAGE 52
. . interests in chemical engineeri~g and the members of this subgroup are responsible for a.dtivities in our field. Admin istratively, we make recomqiend~tions regarding our curriculum a.nd research programs to the ~a.rger group. In this regard, we have the usual problems of ~9rnmunicating with our colleagues whose work is based in physics r ather than in chemistry. The Department offers some 50 term courses a.t the under graduate level in the fields of applied mathematicsr chemical engine a rin g electronics, mechanics of solids and structures, mechanics of fluids, control systems, communications, solid state science, etc. These courses are listed by level in Table 1 in a manner similar to that used in the catalog. Each student is required to build a fouryear program on the following general scheme: 3 terms of physics 3 terms of mathematics 2 terms of chemistry 16 terms of courses in engineering, applied science, science 10 terms of distributional requirements 6 terms of electives The selection of courses in engineering and science must be on a basis to form some coherent pattern but a high degree of flexibility is allowed. Such a system requires close con sultation between the student and his faculty advisors in or der to insure that the course plan is in fact a coherent one and that the student is aware of requirements for admission to graduate schools and of the requirements of industry and government for various kinds o.f posi ti ons. Turning now to the specific case of chemical engineering, it is expected that the majority of students interested in this field will plan a curriculum in accord with the pattern shown in Figure 1. However, we expect that some students will vary this pattern by substitution within the block of E. and A. S. courses. For example, a student with strong interests in applied mathematics or control systems or physics of fluids could replace some of the suggested courses with others if he has a strong reason for doing so. The greatest degree of flexibility comes about, however, with the eight terms of electives, two of which must be in engineering or science. The student planning to enter gradu ate school would be urged to elect courses in mathematics, computers, physics of fluids, or a senior project in chemical engineering. Those planning to enter industry directly might find it advisable to elect courses in economics or data pro cessing or personnel administration. 50
PAGE 53
Thus we feel that we hav~ i a core curriculum which can be tailored to th ~ 1 l 1 equire~ent~ of si:,lldents with a variety. of ~n terests. It w1 J 1 be re cognized, of course, that other insti tutions have similar programs. Hence we present this program not as something new and different but simply as a curricul;,um in chemical engineering which seems to us to fit the raquir ments of the Yale students of today. Many aspects of this approach are present in the interim programs developed for the Classes of 19~ 6 to 1968; the elec tive flexibility has applied to all cla~s~a ~ from 1962 on since it was adopted for undergraduate engineers in 1959. However, as the Class of 1969 will be the first to follow this program for all four years, it is not possible to attempt an overall evaluation of this curriculum now. Figure 1 A Suggested Pattern in Chemical Engineering Term l I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 I I I I Applied Manentum SeparaHeat Reaction I Mathematics Matheand Mas s ti e'n 'TransKinetics I I ma.tics TreIEport Processes fer I I I I I I I I Digital I I I Physics Computa~ Thermodynamics Design I tion I I I I I I I I l I I I Physical General Organic EAS EAS Chemistry Chemistry Chemistry elective elective I I I I I I I I I I I I I English History Philosophy Elective l I I I I I I I I I .. I I I I Foreign Social I I .. Language Science Elective Elective I I I I I I I I I I I I 51
PAGE 54
Number 10a 22a 23b 26a,27b 29b 30a 30b Jlb 32a 35a 38a 39b 42a 43b 45 48a 49b Number 50a,5lb 56a 4'7b 58a 59b 60b 6la,62b 64a 65b 68a 69b 70a 72a 74a 76a,77b 81b 83b 86a,87b 88a,89b 99a,9lb 52 Table 1 . : I _: Term Courses offered by the Department of Eng *. xi.eering and Applied Science . . S~phornot~ or Junior Level Digital Computation Thermodynamics Mechanics of Deformable Bodies Linear Systems Physical Electronics Engineering Analysis Applications of Ordinary Differential Equations Applications of Partial Differential Equations Applications of the Complex Variable Electronic Circuits Advanced Networks Advanced Mechanics Momentum and Nass Transport Chemical Thermodynamics Communications, Language, and Ma.chines Physical Metallurgy Solid State Science Senior Level Case Studies in the Interaction of Engineering and Society Probability and Stochastic Processes Numerical Analysis Applied Discrete Ha.thematics Digital Systems Quantum Mechanics Fluid Mechanics Heat Transfer Energy Conversion St.ructural Mechanics Elasticity Electric and Magnetic Fields Nonlinear Magnetics Communication Theory Control Theory Separation Theory Reaction Kinetics Engineering Design Modern Experimental Techniques Spe9ial Projects
PAGE 55
SOLUTION TO THE . PREVIOUS PROBLEM which appeared in l: No.l, 33 (1964) Restatement of Problem: Consider an infinitely long; counterflow, water to water, heat exchanger. Making appropri i ate ,assumptions, prove th~t the temperature pinch must occur at the inlet of the stream with the larger flow rate, and nowhere else along the exchanger. Solution: I T w Let us say for the moment that the pinch .fill occur at some other location such as shown at the dotted line in the diagram. Call this pinch temperature T. For convenience, let all temperatures be absolute (so that they will all be '. positive). ,. ; Finally; let W be the larger fl.ow rater and w the smaller, so that W >w. Since each stream consists of water, it is reasonable to equate the two heat capacities. An energy balance to the right of the pinch point then gives or W(T 1 T) = w(t 1 T) T 1 T w t1 T = W w But O < i < 1. Combining with Equation 2 yields T 1 T T T 1 0 < ..,.. = < 1 t 1 T = T t 1 (1) (2) (3) 53
PAGE 56
From this last relationship, either (T 1 T) < (t 1 T) and both (T 1 T) and (t 1 T) are positive, .2 (T T 1 ) <: (T t 1 ) and both (T T 1 ) and (T t 1 ) are positive. ; 1, Consi~er the first alternative. Since (T 1 T) is positive,. T 1 > T. This means W cools down as it passes through the exchanger~ and so W must be for the hQi stream. (To accept the eontrary would obviously violate the Second Law by having a cold stream cool down further by thermal contact with a hot stream,) However, canceling T from the aformentioned inequality which is (T 1 T) < (t 1 T) yields T 1 < t 1 This means W is for the ill stream. Obviously, W cannot represent both the hot stream~ the cold stream. Therefore this first alternative is impossible. Consider now the second alternative. Here (T T 1 ) is positive, so T >T 1 This means W warms up as it passes through the exchanger, and so W must be for the cold stream. (Again, accepting the contrary would violate the Second Law.) However t subtracting T from (T T 1 ) < (T t 1 ) which is the inequality for this alternativer yields T 1 < t 1 or T 1 "> t1 This means Wis for the hot stream. Again, W obviously can not represent both the cold stream and the hot stream. There fore this second alternative is also impossible. Since there are only two alternatives, and both are im possible, the entire situation is impossible. In other words we Call!!.2.], say the pinch occurs at some location along the exchanger. In fact, it cannot even occur at the lefthand extremity of the exchanger since we could always write Equa tion 1 for an energy balance to the right of the pinch. The pinch must therefore occur at a location to the right of which we are unable to write an energy balance. Only the righthand extremity of the exchanger qualifies. In other words, the pinch must occur at the inlet of the stream with the larger flow rate. R. L. 54
PAGE 57
TRANSLATION OF TITLES Spanish S. Botero Ge rman H. Zimriier Current Issue: Volume~, Number 2, December 1965 Estimation of Random Error in a Derived Quantity. Calculo del error "De Azar" en una cantidad derivada. Abschlitzung von Random Fehlern in einer abgeleiteten Menge. Approach to Steadystate of a Two Stage Mixer Settler Extractor. Aproximacion al estado constante de un ex tractor de dos etapas tipo mezcladorsedimentador .Annliherung zwn "SteadyState" in einem zweistufen "MixerSettler" Extractor. A Projects Laboratory for Junior Chemical Engineers. Un proyecto de laboratorios para estudiantes de tercer ano en ingenieria quimica. Ein 11 projects labor" ftlr Studenten der chemischen Ingenieurwesen vor dem Vorexamen. Undergraduate Use of Analog Computers. Uso de "analog" computadores en la universidad. Gebrauch von Analogrechenmaschinen durch Studenten erster Semester. Departmentalized Curriculum Based on Chemical Change. Programa para el departamento de ingenieria quimica basado sobre cambios quimicos. Studienplan unter Einbeziehung verschiedener lehrsttlhle basierend auf "Chemical Change." 55 3 11 17 22 32
PAGE 58
A Common Studies Curriculum in Engineering. Un programa de estudios comunes en ingenieria. Ein gemeinsamer Studienplan filr Ingenieure. i The Undergraduate Curriculum in Chemical Engineering at Yale. 56 Programa de estudios basicos para ingenieria quimica en la universidad de Yale. Studienplan bis zum Vorexamen filr chemisches In. genieurwessen an der Yale Universitat. 43 48
xml version 1.0 encoding UTF8
REPORT xmlns http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitss xmlns:xsi http:www.w3.org2001XMLSchemainstance xsi:schemaLocation http:www.fcla.edudlsmddaitssdaitssReport.xsd
INGEST IEID EZTGT4ORA_4127C0 INGEST_TIME 20111024T18:34:05Z PACKAGE AA00000383_00186
AGREEMENT_INFO ACCOUNT UF PROJECT UFDC
FILES

