Front Cover
 Table of Contents
 James E. Bailey of Caltech
 Illinois Institute of Technolo...
 A pilot-scale heat recovery system...
 Memoriam: James J. Christensen
 Memoriam: Roland Andrew Ragatz
 Safety and loss prevention in the...
 Book reviews
 Engineering management: A course...
 A course on presenting technical...
 Flow sheet is process language
 Book reviews
 The mystique of entropy
 Discrete-event simulation in chemical...
 Book reviews
 Levels of simplification: The use...
 Books received
 Back Cover

Chemical engineering education
http://cee.che.ufl.edu/ ( Journal Site )
Full Citation
Permanent Link: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/AA00000383/00098
 Material Information
Title: Chemical engineering education
Alternate Title: CEE
Abbreviated Title: Chem. eng. educ.
Physical Description: v. : ill. ; 22-28 cm.
Language: English
Creator: American Society for Engineering Education -- Chemical Engineering Division
Publisher: Chemical Engineering Division, American Society for Engineering Education
Place of Publication: Storrs, Conn
Publication Date: Spring 1988
Frequency: quarterly[1962-]
annual[ former 1960-1961]
Subjects / Keywords: Chemical engineering -- Study and teaching -- Periodicals   ( lcsh )
Genre: serial   ( sobekcm )
periodical   ( marcgt )
Citation/Reference: Chemical abstracts
Additional Physical Form: Also issued online.
Dates or Sequential Designation: 1960-June 1964 ; v. 1, no. 1 (Oct. 1965)-
Numbering Peculiarities: Publication suspended briefly: issue designated v. 1, no. 4 (June 1966) published Nov. 1967.
General Note: Title from cover.
General Note: Place of publication varies: Rochester, N.Y., 1965-1967; Gainesville, Fla., 1968-
 Record Information
Source Institution: University of Florida
Rights Management: All rights reserved by the source institution and holding location.
Resource Identifier: oclc - 01151209
lccn - 70013732
issn - 0009-2479
Classification: lcc - TP165 .C18
ddc - 660/.2/071
System ID: AA00000383:00098

Table of Contents
    Front Cover
        Front Cover 1
        Front Cover 2
    Table of Contents
        Page 57
    James E. Bailey of Caltech
        Page 58
        Page 59
        Page 60
        Page 61
    Illinois Institute of Technology
        Page 62
        Page 63
        Page 64
        Page 65
        Page 66
        Page 67
    A pilot-scale heat recovery system for computer process control teaching and research
        Page 68
        Page 69
        Page 70
        Page 71
    Memoriam: James J. Christensen
        Page 72
    Memoriam: Roland Andrew Ragatz
        Page 73
    Safety and loss prevention in the undergraduate curriculum: A dual perspective
        Page 74
        Page 75
        Page 76
        Page 77
        Page 78
    Book reviews
        Page 79
    Engineering management: A course to minimize functional handicaps of graduates
        Page 80
        Page 81
        Page 82
        Page 83
    A course on presenting technical talks
        Page 84
        Page 85
        Page 86
        Page 87
    Flow sheet is process language
        Page 88
        Page 89
    Book reviews
        Page 90
        Page 91
    The mystique of entropy
        Page 92
        Page 93
        Page 94
        Page 95
        Page 96
        Page 97
    Discrete-event simulation in chemical engineering
        Page 98
        Page 99
        Page 100
        Page 101
        Page 102
    Book reviews
        Page 103
    Levels of simplification: The use of assumptions, restrictions, and constraints in engineering analysis
        Page 104
        Page 105
        Page 106
        Page 107
    Books received
        Page 108
    Back Cover
        Back Cover 1
        Back Cover 2
Full Text

cemcal engieig e

We wish to
acknowledge and thank...



...for supporting

with a donation of funds.


Department of Chemical Engineering
University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida 32611
Editor: Ray Fahien (904) 392-0857
Consulting Editor: Mack Tyner
Managing Editor:
Carole C. Yocum (904) 392-0861
Publications Board and Regional
Advertising Representatives:
Gary Poehlein
Georgia Institute of Technology
Past Chairmen:
Klaus D. Timmerhaus
University of Colorado
Lee C. Eagleton
Pennsylvania State University
Richard Felder
North Carolina State University
Jack R. Hopper
Lamar University
Donald R. Paul
University of Texas
James Fair
University of Texas
J. S. Dranoff
Northwestern University
Frederick H. Shair
California Institute of Technology
Alexis T. Bell
University of California, Berkeley
Angelo J. Perna
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Stuart W. Churchill
University of Pennsylvania
Raymond Baddour
Charles Sleicher
University of Washington
Leslie W. Shemilt
McMaster University
Thomas W. Weber
State University of New York




58 James E. Bailey of Caltech, Robert Finn

62 Illinois Institute of Technology,
Satish J. Parulekar

68 A Pilot-Scale Heat Recovery System for
Computer Process Control Teaching and
Research, P. J. Callaghan, P. L. Lee,
R. B. Newell
74 Safety and Loss Prevention in the Under-
graduate Curriculum: A Dual Perspective,
Daniel A. Crowl, Joseph F. Louvar
80 Engineering Management: A Course to Minimize
Functional Handicaps of Graduates,
Rex T. Ellington
84 A Course on Presenting Technical Talks,
Richard M. Felder

88 Flow Sheet is Process Language, Manfred Fehr
98 Discrete-Event Simulation in Chemical
Engineering, Daniel J. Schultheisz,
Jude T. Sommerfeld
104 Levels of Simplification: The Use of Assumptions,
Restrictions, and Constraints in Engineering
Analysis, Stephen Whitaker

92 The Mystique of Entropy, B. G. Kyle

71 Letter to the Editor

72 Memoriam: James J. Christensen

73 Memoriam: Roland Andrew Ragatz

79, 86, 90, 91, 103 Book Reviews

108 Books Received

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION (ISSN 0009-2479) is published quarterly by Chemical
Engineering Division, American Society for Engineering Education and is edited at the University of
Florida. Correspondence regarding editorial matter, circulation, and changes of address should be sent to
CEE, Chemical Engineerin Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. Advertising mate-
rial may be sent directlyE. O.Painter Printing Co., P. O. Box 877, DeLeon Springs, FL 32028. Copyright
� 1988 by the Chemical Engineering Division, American Society for Engineering Education. The statements
and opinions expressed in this periodical are those of the writers and not necessarily those of the ChE
Division, ASEE, which body assumes no responsibility for them. Defective copies replaced if notified with
120 days of publication. Write for information on subscription costs and for back copy cost and availability.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to CEE, Chemical Engineering Department, University of Florida,
Gainesville, FL 32611.




of Caltech

California Institute of Technology
Pasadena, CA 91125

HIS COLLEAGUES describe James E. (Jay) Bailey
as a man open to new ideas. Trained as a classi-
cal chemical engineer (Bailey did his doctoral work on
chemical reactor theory, optimization theory, and non-
linear mathematics) he soon developed an interest in
the relatively young field of biochemical engineering.
Lately, Jay has turned even more biological in his ap-
proach, pioneering a brand new field he calls metabolic
engineering. His graduate students, who have joined
in this odyssey, are well prepared to combine the tech-
niques of molecular biology with more traditional en-
gineering methods in the chemical engineering prob-
lem-solving armamentarium.
Jay ascribes many of the twists and turns of this
intellectual odyssey to fortunate encounters with
bright students and interesting colleagues. One of
these chance encounters took place at the University
of Houston in 1972 when Jay, then on the UH faculty,
happened to meet biochemical engineer David Ollis.
(Ollis was at Princeton University at that time; he is
now Distinguished Professor of Chemical Engineering
at North Carolina State University.) As Jay recalls it,
"I was really impressed by the breadth of Dave's
knowledge in biochemical engineering. I didn't know
what a protein was in those days, but after a 30-min-
ute conversation and a couple of phone calls, we de-
cided to write a textbook."
The result was Biochemical Engineering Funda-
mentals, which has by now become the required text
in almost every biochemical engineering course in the
United States and in much of the rest of the world. It
is now in its second edition. "Writing the first edition
of this text was a tremendous learning experience,"
Jay recalls. "I didn't know much biochemistry, micro-
biology, or biochemical engineering at that time. I
read texts and review articles, and I went to Elmer
Gaden's short course. All this convinced me that we
had to emphasize the background material in
biochemistry, physiology, and genetics that differen-

� Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988

tiates biochemical engineering from chemical en-
gineering. A lot of other texts assume that you know
what a protein is, what a bacterium is, what a gene
is. We decided to define those terms, and others, very
explicitly. I think that my entry into the field as a
beginner made the text suitable for other beginners.
The second edition, prepared after I had been heavily
involved in biochemical engineering research for more
than a decade, provided an opportunity to inject some
personal perspectives into the text, in addition to im-
proving its organization and updating its content."
Jay's own education as a chemical engineer was
typical enough. He did both his undergraduate and
graduate work at Rice University, earning his doctor-
ate working on reactor theory and optimization with
Fritz Horn. After a two-year stint with Shell Develop-
ment in Emeryville, California, Jay established his
own laboratory in the Department of Chemical En-
gineering at the University of Houston. It was there
that he first let himself be nudged in the direction of
biochemical engineering.
"In the late 1960s and the early 1970s, the National
Science Foundation sponsored a major effort in en-


Trained as a classical chemical engineer, [Jay] soon developed an interest in the relatively young field
of biochemical engineering. Lately, he has turned even more biological in his approach, pioneering a brand
new field he calls metabolic engineering. His graduate students, who have joined in this odyssey . . .
combine the techniques of molecular bioloav with more traditional enaineerina methods ...

zyme engineering," Jay notes. "I was doing computa-
tional and theoretical work on immobilized enzyme
catalysis and on some diffusion-reaction problems with
unusual properties. Two of my graduate students at
UH had interesting backgrounds-Mike Cho had a
background in biochemistry, and Jila Fazel-Madjlessi
had a background in microbial fermentation. They
helped me start experimental programs in those
With Cho, for example, Bailey made major
theoretical and practical advances in the area of im-
mobilized enzymes. Their work involved the first ap-
plication of the carbodiimide-mediated covalent at-
tachment of enzymes to activated carbon. Using this
approach they constructed hybrid catalysts that com-
bined an enzyme's activity with the catalytic action of
the support surface. Specifically, they looked at the
oxidation of glucose by the enzyme glucose oxidase. A
byproduct of this reaction is hydrogen peroxide, which
tends to deactivate the enzyme. Bailey and Cho dis-
covered that activated carbon decomposes the
peroxide and also assists in the supply of oxygen to
the enzyme sites within the porous catalyst. They
also discovered, however, that loading too much en-
zyme onto the support compromises its efficiency in
deactivating peroxide, and they were able to charac-
terize the tradeoff between higher enzyme loading and
peroxide decomposition in some detail.
Jay's experimental work on immobilized enzymes
continues to this day. One of his most significant dis-
coveries was accomplished in collaboration with Ph.D.
student Doug Clark (now an assistant professor and
NSF Presidential Young Investigator at the Univer-
sity of California, Berkeley). Clark and Bailey com-
bined classical activity studies with electron
paramagnetic spin resonance measurements of spin-
labeled immobilized enzymes. Using this technique,
they were able to establish direct evidence of active
site modification caused by immobilization and to show
the relationship between the degree of modification
and the activity of the enzyme.
Bailey's collaboration with Clark characterizes
Jay's philosophy of graduate education. He firmly be-
lieves that graduate students should participate heav-
ily in their research projects and in formulating
strategies for solving their problems. He observes,
"Graduate students are here to learn how to do re-
search-not just how to do experiments or calcula-

Jay enjoys weekly group seminars to discuss progress
and problems in the lab.
tions, but how to identify a particular problem within
an important general area. I encourage them to con-
sider the method of accomplishing a solution and its
feasibility as well as the ultimate impact that the so-
lution will have. Besides, since I've been fortunate to
work with many excellent students, it would be foolish
of me to presume that I have all the necessary ideas
and knowledge. I depend on my students to contribute
substantially to all aspects of their projects. On many
occasions, including Doug Clark's work, my students
have transformed my vague suggestions into highly
original and productive research."
Jay's work on periodic processes and biochemical
engineering during nine years on the faculty of the
University of Houston was recognized in 1979 by the
Allan P. Colburn Award of the American Institute of
Chemical Engineers. He came to Caltech in 1980. Ac-
cording to John Seinfeld, a close friend of Bailey's and
Caltech's Louis E. Nohl Professor and Professor of
Chemical Engineering, "I first met Jay about twelve
years ago at an AIChE meeting and we became
friends. Around 1979 I realized that Jay might con-
sider moving. He was quickly establishing himself as
one of the leading people in biochemical engineering
in the United States."
Jay has been good for Caltech, and the intimacy
and informality of the Caltech environment have ap-
parently been very good for him as well. "The biggest
qualitative change in my work came after I arrived at
Caltech. Here my students and I can learn from and


interact with some of the top people in biochemistry,
molecular biology, and cell biology, not to mention
chemical engineering. Cross-disciplinary collaboration
happens almost automatically at Caltech."
It was at Caltech that the techniques of genetic
engineering began influencing Jay's work. The revolu-
tion in recombinant DNA technology that began in
the late 1970s has been widely seen as the biologist's
show. But Bailey realized that if these techniques
were to realize their commercial potential, chemical
engineers would have to get intimately involved.
He also realized that modeling concepts from trad-
itional chemical reaction engineering could be effec-
tively applied in a new context-viewing a single cell

A sophisticated flow cytometer-cell sorter, here operated
by Dane Wittrup and Elaine Meilhoc, has supported
many PhD projects in Bailey's laboratory.
as a complex chemical reactor and transport ap-
paratus. Working in Jay's group, Sun Bok Lee (now
at the Korea Advanced Institute for Science and
Technology) and Steve Peretti (currently an assistant
professor at North Carolina State University) formu-
lated powerful new mathematical models that included
genetic level regulation.
Another consequence of Jay's interest in genetic
engineering was his collaboration with Caltech's
Judith Campbell, associate professor of chemistry and
biology, who studies basic mechanisms of DNA repli-
cation in yeast. Genetic engineers often use the tech-
nique of inserting recombinant plasmidss" into yeast
cells to get them to produce desired proteins in quan-
tity. Plasmids are relatively small, circular segments
of DNA that contain regulatory genes and genes that
code for proteins. There is one important problem
with foreign plasmids, however: As the recombinant
yeast cells divide, they tend to lose their plasmids
generation by generation, gradually becoming less
and less productive.
Bailey and Campbell have made a concerted effort
to understand this process using flow cytometry mea-
surements to provide unprecedented detail on single-

cell plasmid content in recombinant populations. In
flow cytometry individual cells are sent past a laser
beam, one by one, but very rapidly. In a process that
takes about one millisecond per cell, flow cytometry
permits determinations of cell size, shape, internal
structure, and the concentration of specific compounds
in individual cells. Many graduate students and post-
doctoral fellows have contributed to a growing body
of flow cytometry research in Jay's lab, and several of
these collaborators, including Friedrich Srienc at Min-
nesota and Jin-Ho Seo at Purdue, are now extending
these methods in their research labs.
Some of Jay's work in progress involves sharpen-
ing the focus of the genetic engineering studies to
more subtle and interesting problems. For example,
he's gotten interested in the details of what exactly
happens to a protein after synthesis. There are essen-
tially three possibilities: The protein can be degraded,
it can be exported from the cell, or it can remain in
the cell in solution or in an aggregate. If genetic en-
gineering is to fulfil its economic promise, these alter-
natives must be understood and the factors that con-
trol protein targeting must be better characterized in
quantitative terms.
Typically, genetic engineers concern themselves
with attempts to make cells produce certain proteins
in quantity. But chemical engineers are well aware of
the fact that proteins are not the only compounds of
economic importance made by cells. Realizing this,
Jay's group is concentrating on a brand new field that
Jay calls metabolic engineering. "Metabolic engineer-
ing involves the application of genetic engineering
techniques to alter or enhance the metabolism of
cells," Jay explains. "The goal is to overproduce spe-
cific amino acids, acetone, vitamins, certain biopoly-
mers, or other important chemicals made in cells.
Metabolic engineering requires a lot better under-
standing of what a cell is doing.
"First, we must understand all the pathways avail-
able to an organism for producing the target com-
pound and determine what additional pathways we
could make possible by introducing new enzyme ac-
tivities into that organism. Then, it's important to
judge which regulatory points along the pathway are
most important, since these determine the rate and
the selectivity for the target compound. After deter-
mining the most promising target enzymes, we must
clone the gene for that enzyme, attach the gene to a
suitable vector, and insert it into the organism. Then,
of course, we must investigate the effects of our gene-
tic manipulations on the production of the target com-
pound and its intermediates."
Jay's group has made significant advances in all


steps of this process. In terms of understanding
metabolic pathways in detail, Alex Seressiotis, a
former student of his who's now at Columbia Univer-
sity, developed a computer program called MPS
(Metabolic Pathway Synthesis). The program contains
a database system that stores enzyme and substance
descriptions. "MPS can be used on a qualitative basis
to examine the effects of adding or deleting enzyme
activities to or from the cellular environment, to clas-
sify pathways with respect to cellular objectives, and
to extract information about metabolic regulation,"
Jay says. In an illustration of the power of MPS,
Seressiotis and Bailey had it consider the conversion
of pyruvate to the amino acid L-alanine. MPS came
up with a route to L-alanine that does not incorporate
the enzyme alanine aminotransferase, which is com-
monly assumed to be a required step for alanine
Jay's lab has the distinction of being one of the
first chemical engineering labs in the world with full
cloning facilities. 'The traditional way of producing
strains of an organism with desired properties was to
use a mutagenesis program," notes Bailey. This in-
volves exposing the cells to radiation or other muta-
gens and assaying the resulting organisms for the
property in question. "But this is a very random, time
consuming, and sloppy technique. By using recombin-
ant DNA technology we can make the whole process
far more rational. Furthermore, students with cloning
experience are more equipped to consider genetic as
well as process solutions to engineering problems.
And they'll be far better prepared to interact produc-
tively with molecular biologists in the future."
To investigate the effects of genetic manipulations
made in his lab, Jay's group has recently developed
novel data analysis methods for use with his new, 300
megahertz, wide-bore NMR. These methods allow im-
portant measurements to be accomplished simultane-
ously from a group of living cells. In a single experi-
ment, Jay's students can estimate intracellular pH,
the concentration of several key sugar phosphate
metabolic intermediates, and the concentrations of
adenosine di- and triphosphate (ADP and ATP).
At present, Bailey's lab is working on three pro-
jects in metabolic engineering. In the first of these
projects, the lab is attempting to enhance the uptake
of the sugar hexose in the yeast Saccharomyces cere-
visiae. Hexose uptake is the rate-limiting step for
growth in this economically important organism,
which is used for ethanol production and in the genet-
ically engineered production of other compounds. The
second project involves engineering the bacterium Es-
cherichia coli to produce ethanol by inserting genes

Jay explored the crater of M. Bromo in Java, Indonesia,
in April 1987.

for pyruvate decarboxylase and alcohol dehydro-
genase. In a third project, the group is trying to im-
prove production of ATP (the cell's energy currency)
in E. coli.
Not all chemical engineers agree with the direction
Bailey's research has taken. According to John Sein-
feld, there are still a few diehards out there who ex-
press skepticism about chemical engineers who get
involved with essentially biological techniques. But,
Seinfeld says, there are fewer and fewer naysayers.
"I think biochemical engineering is going to mature.
People are recognizing that it will take its place as a
firm field in chemical engineering and, in a sense, set-
tle down. It is difficult for biochemical engineering to
be as rigorous as some other fields of chemical en-
gineering that are closer to physics. That level of rigor
is being supplied by people like Jay Bailey. There will
be more biology in the education of future chemical
engineers as a result of his work."
The education of chemical engineers is a subject
that's important to Bailey. He's particularly proud of
the fact that many of his former graduate students
have become faculty members at important univer-
sities around the world. Frances Arnold, assistant
professor of chemical engineering at Caltech and
Bailey's wife says, "Jay takes a personal interest in
each of his students. He's always willing to sit down
with them and tell them the 'facts of life' of the chem-
ical engineering profession. His students show a lot of
loyalty as a result of his interest in them."
Important institutions to Jay's group of students
and postdocs are Friday afternoon group seminars
and, following that, the traditional "Ho-Ho" in the
Rathskeller of the Athenaeum, Caltech's faculty club.
"Gathering outside the lab for conversation and a few
Continued on page 102.



I Chemical engineering offices and laboratories are located in Perlstein Hall.


Illinois Institute of Technology
Chicago, IL 60616

THE DEPARTMENT OF Chemical Engineering at
the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT), formally
established in 1904, is one of the oldest chemical en-
gineering departments in the nation. The develop-
ment of the department in the pre-1971 period was
previously described in this journal [1]. Dramatic
changes have occurred in the department since that
time in terms of faculty, undergraduate and graduate
programs, and research. All current chemical en-
gineering faculty, with the exception of one member,
were added after 1974. Since then, there has been a
significant expansion in research activities and re-
search areas pursued, with the current faculty having
expertise in traditional as well as emerging areas in

� Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988

chemical engineering. This is also reflected in the un-
dergraduate and graduate curricula, which have
changed significantly to meet the changing needs of
the profession.
IIT's main campus, internationally recognized as
an architectural landmark and located three miles
south of Chicago's downtown area and a mile west of
Lake Michigan, was designed in the 1940s by Ludwig
Mies van der Rohe, one of this century's most influen-
tial architects. The current university population on
the main campus includes about 6500 undergraduate
and graduate students and about 500 faculty. The
other campuses of IIT are located in downtown
Chicago and in the western suburbs of Chicago in
DuPage County. Chicago, one of the largest cities in
the world and a national and international center of
business and industry, offers students an exception-
ally wide variety of professional and cultural re-
sources. The close proximity of several chemical, food,
and allied industry research centers and production


Since engineering is largely a team effort, we believe that development of the individual's ability to
work effectively as part of a team is important. To accomplish this, the laboratory courses
and the design courses involve teams of students . . . laboratory sections are small and
a high level of personal contact between students and instructor is maintained . . .

plants provides for the IIT community an invaluable
source of close interaction with industry.
The chemical engineering offices and laboratories
are located in Perlstein Hall. Presently, about 150 full-
time undergraduate students and 60 full-time
graduate students are enrolled in the department. In
addition, there are about 40 part-time undergraduate
students and 50 part-time graduate students. Three
graduate degrees are offered by the Chemical En-
gineering Department: Master of Science (MS), Mas-
ter of Chemical Engineering (MChE), and Doctor of
Philosophy (PhD). The department annually awards
nearly 40 Bachelor of Science, 10 MS, 10 MChE, and
8 PhD degrees.
Over the years, the department has graduated
many competent engineers, a number of whom have
obtained significant national prominence in their pro-
fessional careers. Several of our alumni have held na-
tional office in the American Institute of Chemical En-
gineers. Although a majority of our alumni have pur-
sued professional careers in industry, we are proud
that, over the years, a significant number have joined
chemical engineering faculties at major institutions.
The research areas pursued in the pre-1971 period
were chemical reaction engineering, separation pro-
cesses, thermodynamics, and transport and interfacial
phenomena [1]. In recent years, many additional areas
of research have been initiated and strengthened.
They include biochemical engineering, biomedical en-
gineering, combustion, energy technology, enhanced
gas and oil recovery, and process dynamics and con-
trol. Interdisciplinary research has been a strong
tradition at IIT and several joint initiatives with other
departments have evolved to address problems in the
critical emerging areas. Some of the faculty have
cooperative research activities with the Institute of
Gas Technology, IIT Research Institute, and Argonne
National Laboratory. All such interactions provide an
intellectually stimulating environment for the
graduate students. The development of IIT's very
strong research and educational center in food
technology at the Moffett Technical Center (located in
the Chicago area) will be completed this summer.

Some of the chemical engineering faculty will be
closely associated with this center.
It is interesting to look at the current faculty in
chronological order of joining the chemical engineer-
ing department at IIT in order to trace the growth of
our program in recent years.
Darsh Wasan, currently acting Dean of the Ar-
mour College of Engineering, is the oldest faculty
member in terms of service, having joined IIT in 1964.
He served as department chairman from 1971 to 1987.
His research deals with interfacial and colloidal phe-
nomena, enhanced oil recovery, and separation pro-
cesses. Darsh and his research team are developing
experimental techniques to accurately measure sur-
face and interfacial theological properties. This re-
search has significant utility in control of a variety of
dispersed phase systems and in study of the mecha-
nisms of oil bank formation and propagation in chem-
ical flooding processes involving surfactants and al-
kaline agents, foams, emulsions, and polymers for mo-
bility control. Research in separations is concentrated
on separation of fine particles from non-aqueous media
based on electrokinetic phenomena, emulsification/de-
mulsification processes and thin liquid film phenome-
na. Darsh is a recipient of the Western Electric Fund
Award of the ASEE, the Hausner Award of the Fine
Particle Society, and the Special Creativity Award of
the National Science Foundation.
The mid-1970s saw the addition of two of the cur-
rent faculty members, Rob Selman and Dimitri Gidas-
pow. Rob Selman, currently acting chairman of the
department, joined the faculty in 1975. His research
interests are electrochemistry and electrochemical en-
gineering with a special emphasis on high-tempera-
ture processes. Rob and his students are currently
investigating the formation, growth, and corrosion of
dendritic metal deposits, a problem common in the
charging of zinc-based aqueous batteries which are
being developed for electric vehicles and load leveling.
Other current research projects deal with fundamen-
tal aspects of molten carbonate fuel cells and develop-
ment of porous-electrode models for these fuel cells.
The characterization of micro-emulsions by AC impe-
dance is being investigated to assess the effectiveness
of electrochemical oxidation as a means of breaking
micro-emulsions. Other research projects under Rob's
direction deal with molten salt processes involving


carbon cathodes and amorphous metal deposition from
molten salts.
Dimitri Gidaspow joined the faculty in 1977.
Dimitri's research interests are in the areas of
mathematical modeling and analysis of various energy
conversion processes. His current research involves
studies of the hydrodynamic theories of fluidization
and gas-solids transport. Generalizations of Navier-
Stokes' equations are being solved using supercom-
puters to predict phenomena such as cluster forma-
tions in risers and bubble motion in fluidized beds. In
collaboration with Darsh Wasan, he also conducts re-
search in the areas of separation of colloidal particles
and electrostatic desulfurization of coal. Dimitri has
been recognized for his research through the Donald
Q. Kern Award of the AIChE and the Special Creativ-
ity Award of the National Science Foundation.
The bulk of the present faculty members arrived
on the scene in the 1980s. Richard Beissinger joined
the chemical engineering department in 1981.

Taha Alkhamis and Richard Beissinger working with a
Weissenberg rheogoniometer for blood viscosity mea-

Richard's research is concerned with transport phe-
nomena in biological systems. His current research
activities are in blood-artificial surface interactions,
biorheology, and development of artificial red blood
cells. He also conducts research in the development of
implantable drug infusion systems and in phar-
macokinetics. Some of his current research projects
are: augmented mass transport in sheared suspen-
sions; macromolecular adsorption to solid surfaces;
liposome-encapsulated hemoglobin and hemoglobin-in-
oil-in-water multiple emulsion droplets as red blood
substitutes; and the effects of red blood cells on
platelet adhesion and aggregation in laminar shear

Jill Weldon and Selim Senkan discussing experiments
with a flat flame burner in the combustion research lab-

flow. Rich is also directing development of the inter-
disciplinary Polymer Science and Engineering pro-
Ali Cinar, who arrived in 1982, conducts research
in process control and dynamics. Control strategies
for multivariable chemical processes are being de-
veloped and tested using experimental systems and
real-time microcomputers. One of his research pro-
jects deals with developing methods for selecting
robust operating configurations and improved control
strategies using a pilot plant consisting of two cataly-
tic tubular reactor beds with internal heat exchange
and a feed-effluent heat exchanger. Ali and some of
his graduate students are also investigating forced
periodic operation of chemical reactors using the vi-
brational control approach. Their work is focused on
stabilization of exothermic continuous stirred tank
reactors and tubular packed bed reactors as well as
on improvement in selectivity and yield of complex
reactions. Another of Al's research projects deals
with development of expert systems for fault-tolerant
computer control of complex processes, such as multi-
bed autothermal reactors.
Selim Senkan joined IIT in 1982. His research is
in the areas of combustion and high-temperature
chemical reaction engineering as applied to problems
in energy conversion, propulsion, and environmental
protection. One of his research projects deals with ex-
perimental and theoretical investigation of oxidation
and pyrolysis of chlorinated hydrocarbons (CHCs)
using model compounds. In the experimental pro-
gram, stationary flames of selected CHCs are probed
for the determination of species and species profiles


using supersonic jet sampling coupled with on-line
molecular beam mass spectroscopy (MBMS). An out-
come of this research is the recently patented,
economic process for conversion of methane into
acetylene and ethylene. Because of low NO, pollutant
emissions, catalytic combustion is an attractive alter-
native to flame combustion when very high tempera-
tures are not required. Selim and his group are also
involved in the study of the impact of halogens on
catalyst development, reaction rates, and selectivity
in catalytic combustion processes.
William Weigand joined the IIT faculty in 1983.
His research interests are biochemical engineering
and process control. Bill and his research group are
involved in kinetic modeling of cell growth and prod-
uct formation for microorganisms which produce pri-
mary and secondary metabolites. The optimal operat-
ing procedures are then derived and examined with
the aid of computer simulations and experiments car-
ried out with highly-instrumented, computer-coupled
fermentors. Bill is also interested in development of
new sensors and the use of estimation techniques
which permit optimal operation in the absence of com-
plete variable measurement. In the area of process
control, techniques for control in the presence of mod-
eling error, for changing system dynamics, and for
nonlinear interacting systems are being developed.
Hamid Arastoopour and Satish Parulekar joined
the department in the fall of 1985. Hamid Aras-
toopour has research interests in the areas of multi-
phase flow, flow in porous media and unconventional
gas reserves, and fossil fuel conversion processes.
Current research projects being investigated by
Hamid and his graduate students are hydrodynamic
analysis of pneumatic conveying of solids, numerical
analysis of single and multiphase flow in unconven-
tional reserves, analysis and measurement of the
agglomeration of sticky particles and heat transfer in
fluidized beds, and analysis and measurement of tran-
sient gas and condensate flow in gas transmission and
distribution systems.
Satish Parulekar conducts research in biochemi-
cal engineering and chemical reaction engineering.
His research in biochemical engineering deals with
production of extracellular and intracellular enzymes/
proteins by recombinant and wild-type microor-
ganisms and production of biochemicals using im-
mobilized cell reactors. The research with recombin-
ant organisms is aimed at gaining a fundamental un-
derstanding of host-plasmid interactions in these
species and the effect of these interactions on plasmid
stability, cell growth and product gene expression.
The research with wild-type microorganisms is di-

rected towards understanding the mechanism of syn-
thesis of extracellular enzymes such as amylases and
proteases. The research dealing with immobilized cell
reactors is focused on study of alteration in cellular
metabolism due to immobilization and implications of
such alteration in design of these reactors. His re-
search in chemical reaction engineering is concerned
with identification of optimal reactor structures for

Prasad Davuluri and Hamid Arastoopour studying tran-
sient gas transport with a Laser Doppler velocimeter.

complex reaction networks and experimental and
theoretical investigation of forced periodic operation
of continuous flow (CSTR and tubular) reactors.
Henry Linden joined the faculty in the spring of
1987 as the F. W. Gunsaulus Distinguished Professor
of Chemical Engineering. Henry has had an excep-
tionally illustrious career in research in fuel technol-
ogy at both the Institute of Gas Technology and the
Gas Research Institute and was president of each of
these institutions for several years. His distinguished
career has led to membership in the National
Academy of Engineering, as well as to numerous hon-
ors and awards such as the Distinguished Service
Award from the American Gas Association. Having
Henry on board will give us the benefit of his wide-
ranging experience and insight in energy-related re-


The mission of the undergraduate program in
chemical engineering at IIT is to prepare our students
for their professional careers and to enable them to
develop the technology of the future. There is enough
flexibility in the program for each student to tailor an
individualized curriculum to satisfy his or her particu-
lar scientific or technical interests. The first two years
are devoted to the fundamental sciences, mathema-
tics, and engineering sciences and are particularly
concerned with the development of professional skills.
In addition to developing engineering competence, the
program examines the economic and societal implica-
tions of chemical engineering. The required courses
are material and energy balances, and unit opera-
tions-I in the sophomore year; thermodynamics, trans-
port phenomena, unit operations-II, and chemical en-
gineering laboratory-I in the junior year; and chemical
reaction engineering, process control, chemical pro-
cess design (two semesters), and chemical engineering
laboratory-II in the senior year.
In addition, there are elective courses in bioen-
gineering, computer applications in chemical en-
gineering, colloidal and interfacial phenomena, elec-
trochemistry, energy technology, food technology,
microelectronics fabrication, and polymer processing.
Students interested in gaining professional specializa-
tion may include some of these courses in their cur-
riculum to earn a specialized minor in one of the fol-
lowing areas: biotechnology, computers in chemical
engineering, energy technology, food technology, and
polymer engineering.
Since engineering is largely a team effort, we be-
lieve that development of the individual's ability to
work effectively as part of a team is important. To
accomplish this, the laboratory courses and the design
courses involve teams of students. Since individual in-
struction is so important to students' growth, labora-
tory sections are small and a high level of personal
contact between student and instructor is maintained.
Some of our best students also choose to work on inde-
pendent research projects during their junior and/or
senior years, which prepare them for graduate re-

The coursework for MS and MChE degrees must
include at least four of the following six core courses:
chemical reaction engineering, fluid mechanics, heat
transfer, mass transfer, process control, and ther-
modynamics. For a PhD degree, coursework in all six
areas is required so that the students will be equipped

At IIT we are developing courses to integrate
these emerging areas into our curricula while, at
the same time, leaving the emphasis on science
and engineering fundamentals unchanged.

to apply advanced principles from the entire spectrum
of chemical engineering irrespective of their research
specialization. A student pursuing an MS must com-
plete eight credit hours in research and thesis work.
The MChE is a professionally-oriented degree pro-
gram which permits a concentration in engineering
practice. The requirements are the same as those for
the MS degree, except that additional courses and/or
a project replace the eight credit hours of thesis.
Every prospective PhD candidate must take a qualify-
ing examination to determine fitness and aptitude for
further graduate study. Research qualities are judged
during the oral comprehensive examination over the
student's dissertation proposal, taken some time after
admission to candidacy. After successfully clearing
this examination, the candidate pursues the selected
research program in consultation with the research
adviser and advisory committee.
In addition to the core courses, IIT offers a wide
variety of elective graduate courses which in the past
three years have included biochemical engineering,
catalysis, computational techniques, electrochemical
engineering, polymer processing, reservoir engineer-
ing, separation processes and transport phenomena in
living systems. Many of the graduate courses, particu-
larly the core courses, are televised through the IIT/V
network. Remote centers for reception of these tele-
casts are located near several of the industrial centers
within a fifty-mile radius from the IIT campus for the
benefit of part-time students.

As the chemical engineering profession changes
and adapts to the technology needs of the next decade
and the next century, so must chemical engineering
education. In the coming years, the curriculum con-
tent will be modified to accommodate new technology
areas in chemical engineering. At IIT, we are develop-
ing courses to integrate these emerging areas into our
curricula while, at the same time, leaving the em-
phasis on science and engineering fundamentals un-
changed. As in the past, thorough training of the un-
dergraduate as well as graduate students will continue
to receive the highest priority.

1. Kintner, R. C., D. T. Wasan, Chem Eng. Ed., 5, 108 (1971). [



Morton M. Denn, Editor Published Monthly

The AIChE JOURNAL, a monthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers,
is devoted to fundamental research and developments having immediate or potential value
in chemical engineering.

Increased to. 12 issues in 1985, this journal now provides more comprehensive coverage of
ongoing research and developing technologies in chemical engineering. As a permanent
repository of innovative processes, efficient analyses of data and current theoretical ideas,
it serves as an excellent reference source for researchers. Original papers are reviewed by
a board of peer scientists and engineers. Contributors come from industry, government
and university research groups in the U.S. and throughout the world.

Range is broad and includes such varied topics as: heat transfer, mass transfer, fluidization,
kinetics, adsorption, process dynamics, membrane technology, separation processes,
solid-liquid systems, reactor technology, electrofaction, polymer processing, filtration,
crystallization. Coverage impacts upon chemical, environmental and biotechnological

1988 Annual Subscription Prices: AIChE Members $40 Others $275 Foreign Extra: $13
Subscriptions are on a calendar-year basis

Send Orders to: AIChE Subscription Dept. A, 345 East 47 Street, New York NY 10017. Prepayment in
U.S. currency is required (check, VISA, MasterCard, international money order, or bank draft drawn
on a New York bank). Members may order only one subscription at member price and must indicate
membership number when ordering. Credit card customers: Please indicate "VISA" or "MasterCard,"
include card number, expiration date, printed name of cardholder and signature.


i laboratory




and R. B. NEWELL
University of Queensland
St. Lucia, Qld, Australia 4067

N THE LAST two decades efficient energy utilization
and process integration have become increasingly
important to chemical plant economics. Plant design
for these factors has meant higher levels of process
interaction, often with positive feedback, which re-
quire improved control. A typical example is the heat
recovery circuit in reactor or distillation systems.
Process equipment used in the laboratory to inves-
tigate the control problems created by tighter process
integration is more convenient. This can be sum-
marized as

* Lower cost of pilot-scale equipment, and
* Loss of production and or product quality are not issues
during process experimentation.

However, instrumentation and control equipment
is "off the shelf" as is found in industry and hence is
a significant cost factor. The aim in building process
control rigs for undergraduate teaching and graduate

The pilot-scale heat recovery system is a valuable
teaching and research tool. It is sufficiently flexible
to demonstrate basic principles and yet sufficiently
complex to demonstrate common process control
problems such as nonlinearities and interactions
between variables.

research is to create rigs that are

* Flexible enough to demonstrate a number of basic princi-
* Sufficiently complex to demonstrate common process con-
trol problems such as nonlinearities and interactions be-
tween variables
* Economical

Due to the important role of real time computing
in process control, it is essential to provide teaching
and demonstration facilities of such techniques. In ad-
dition, most advanced control strategies require the
use of process control computers for successful im-

Equipment Details

FIGURE 1. Schematic diagram of pilot-scale heat recov-
ery circuit.
C Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988

Valves V1 and V2

Valve V3
Double pipe exchanger

Plate heat exchanger
dp Cell
Pressure transmitter PIT1
Steam supply pressure to
experimental apparatus
Pressure transmitter PIT2

Fisher Control Valves, size 34
and 30 respectively
Badger Meter Inc, size B
2.43m long, 13mm diameter
copper pipe, 38mm diameter
copper jacket
Alpha Laval P20-HB
Metric Series 18 with S.S. plug
Taylor Instuments, 0-5"H20
Beckman, 0-500 kPa

Honeywell, 0-500 kPa




A schematic diagram of the laboratory rig is shown
in Figure 1. Mains water is preheated in a pre-heat
plate heat exchanger, HE1. After preheating it flows
through a steam heated double pipe heat exchanger,
HE2. After the double pipe exchanger the water splits
either to be used in the preheat plate heat exchanger
or to bypass the heat exchanger. When the streams
rejoin they are fed to a constant head drain. A control
valve, V3, is installed in the bypass line and may be
used to regulate the bypass flowrate. Equipment de-
tails are given in Table 1.
There are two manipulated variables in the sys-
tem: a control valve in the steam line, V1, and a con-
trol valve, V2, in the hot line after the double pipe
exchanger leading to the preheat plate exchanger.
They can be used to control any of the dependent vari-
ables, but typically the final mixed temperature, TT3,

P. J. Callaghan received his BEChem and his MEngSci degrees
from the University of Queensland in 1984 and 1986. His Master's
programme centered on the development and use of a predictive con-
trol algorithm for the heat exchange system described in this paper.
He is currently employed by Akoa Ltd. as a control engineer. (Not
P. L. Lee received his BEChem from RMIT in Melbourne and his PhD
from Monash University in 1980. He worked in the design and commis-
sioning of computer control systems for both continuous and batch
plants for three years before coming to Queensland. His early research
was on the control of the unstable steady state in an exothermic CSTR.
His interests include multivariable self-tuning and adaptive control of
fermentation and heat recovery systems. (L)
R. B. Newell received his BScApp and BEChem from Queensland
and his PhD from the University of Alberta. He also has a DipEd in
Tertiary Education from Monash. He joined the staff at Monash Univer-
sity in 1974 and moved to Queensland in 1980. His early research
was in the multivariable control of a pilot plant evaporator, unstable
steady state control in a CSTR, and multilevel hierarchical optimization.
Current interests include optimization of the Australian oil refinery and
transportation system, combined fuzzy and deterministic control, and
selftuning and adaptive control of heat recovery systems. (R)

and the temperature out of the double pipe exchanger,
TT2, are used. A standard differential-pressure
bypass control loop is usually implemented to maintain
the pressure drop across the plate heat exchanger con-


An interface box between the process instrumen-
tation and the control system is located on the rig.
This box displays all rig variables, both manipulated
and controlled, i.e., the steam pressure, the hot side
water flowrate to the plate heat exchanger, and the
three temperature measurements and the valve posi-
tions. The interface box is supplied with 240V AC
power and supplies 24V DC for instruments and trans-
ducers. Standard signals are 0-5V for control signals
and 1-5V for measurements. The interface box also
has the facility to switch the manipulated variables
from remote to local, by interrupting the signal from
the control system and supplying a manual signal.
Figure 2 shows the responses in the exit tempera-

20 40 60 80 10 129 140 16t 188 288

28 40 69 869 10 120 148 10B IS0 260

FIGURE 2. Step test responses for TT2 due to a 10% step
(a) up and (b) down in VI after sample 20.


ture to 10% step changes up and down in the steam.
The sample time during the collection of this data was
five seconds. Note that both magnitude and shape of
responses differ, illustrating non-linear behaviour.
Also the need for filtering is apparent from this raw

Basic Data Collection and Regulatory Control
The control system used to monitor and control
the pilot-scale apparatus is arranged as shown in Fig-
ure 3. This equipment is arranged in a hierarchical
manner, consisting of two layers: a primary data col-
lection and regulatory control level, and an advanced
control level.

IBM Supervisory



FIGURE 3. Control system equipment.

The primary data collection and regulatory control
functions are performed using a Bailey Network 90
distributed control system. The heart of the system is
a "multi-function controller," which is a micro-proces-
sor based controller. It performs all of the regulatory
control functions and coordinates the operation of the
analog-to-digital input and digital-to-analog output
cards. Operator interface is provided by means of a
color CRT display. This display is capable of showing
schematic representations of the pilot-scale equipment
with measurement data displayed, controller faceplate
displays, trend plots of measurement inputs, and com-
binations of the above types of displays.

Advanced Control Function
The advanced control functions, such as imple-
menting multivariable predictive controllers are per-
formed using the IBM Advanced Control System
(ACS) previously described in this journal by Koppel
and Sullivan [1]. However, this application uses ACS
in a real-time environment.
The University of Queensland installation consists
of an IBM 4341-2 mainframe with 8 Mbytes of mem-
ory, 12 terminals and 2 printers in two clusters, line-
printer, 1.8 Gbytes of disc storage, a tape drive and
a Series/1 minicomputer with direct process I/O and
connections to the Bailey Network 90 system.

The experimental rig has a number of interesting
characteristics that make it particularly suitable for
teaching real-time process control:

* Non-linear behaviour. This is shown in Figure 2, which
illustrates the different time constants for a step increase
and a step decrease in the steam supply valve Vl. The time
constants are approximately 96 and 45 seconds respec-
* Interacting behaviour. This is illustrated by examination
of the relative gain array for this process shown in Table 2.
* The inherent noise in the measurements, again illustrated
in Figure 2.

The following teaching experiments utilize this rig:

1. Examination of digital filtering. Students are
asked to examine the effects of different filter
bandwidths and different filter types (exponential,
Butterworth, union). This short experiment is used
in teaching real-time computing and would be ex-
pected to take one hour of laboratory time.
2. A cascade loop controls the double pipe exit
temperature with a slave loop controlling the pres-
sure in the steam jacket via the steam valve. This ex-
periment only utilizes the Bailey Network 90 system
and students are expected to complete this experi-
ment in one and a half hours.
3. Feedforward control. A feedforward controller
compensates for disturbances in the feed flowrate by
adjusting both the steam and water valves. This ex-
periment, combined with a model identification exer-
cise usually takes about three hours of laboratory
4. Decoupling control. Two feedback loops or two
interacting feedback loops are used as a basis for in-


producing the concept of process interactions. The
students are then expected to design and implement
a decoupled controller using lead-lag compensators.
This experiment normally takes six to nine hours to
5. Adaptive control. An adaptive single loop con-
troller adjusts the steam valve to control the exit
temperature. This experiment, used in a fourth-year
elective control course, makes use of the ACS system
and would normally involve fifteen hours of labora-
tory time.

Current research utilizing the rig is on a predictive
control design technique described by Maurath, et al.
[2]. The basic predictive control algorithm uses a
model to predict the output for a number of future
moves due to the previous inputs. An error is formed
by subtracting the prediction of the output from the
setpoint. This error vector is then used to calculate a
change in the manipulated variables. The design tech-
nique being tested is to use a singular value decompo-
sition to condition the Dynamic Matrix [2] of step re-
sponses. Results from this study are reported else-
where [3].
Future work on the rig will include fuzzy identifi-
cation and control. A model-based controller designed
around a fuzzy model of the process will be used to
control the rig. Fuzzy identification techniques will be
used off-line to derive an initial model, and on-line to
provide continuous updating of the model. The on-line
use of fuzzy identification turns the model-based con-
troller into a fuzzy adaptive controller [4, 5, 6].
A reactor heat recovery system is a possible exten-
sion to the current rig. This is achievable by using an
exponential function on the exit temperature of the
double pipe exchanger to move the steam valve. This
allows for simulation of variable heats of reaction
without the danger and cost of reactants. In this mode
only one manipulated variable is possible, i.e., the
water valve (V2).

The pilot-scale heat recovery system is a valuable
teaching and research tool. It is sufficiently flexible to

Relative Gain Array
VI 0.22 0.78
V2 0.78 0.22

demonstrate basic principles and yet sufficiently com-
plex to demonstrate common process control problems
such as nonlinearities and interactions between vari-
The process control system equipment allows stu-
dents to obtain experience in real time computing, at
several process control functional levels.

1. Koppel, L. B. and G. R. Sullivan "Use of IBM's Advanced
Control System in Undergraduate Process Control Education,"
Chem. Eng. Educ. XX, No. 2, pp. 70-73, 106-07, 1986.
2. Maurath, P. R., D. E. Seborg, and D. A. Mellichamp, "Predic-
tive Controller Design by Principal Components Analysis,"
Proc. Acc., 1985, pp. 1059-1065.
3. Callaghan, P. J., M.Eng.Sc. Dissertation, University of
Queensland, 1986.
4. Graham, B. P. and R. B. Newell, "Computer Control of Dif-
ficult Processes," Chemeca 84, Vol 2, pp. 743-749 (1984).
5. Graham, B. P., P. L. Lee, and R. B. Newell, "Simulation of
Muitivariable Control of a Cement Kiln," Chem. Eng. Res.
Des., 63, Nov. 1985.
6. Graham, B. P., R. B. Newell, G. P. Le Page, and L. C.
Stonehouse, "Industrial Applications of Fuzzy Identification
and Control," Chemeca 86, pp. 221-226 (1986). D



Dear Editor:

In a recent paper, "A Course in Mass
Transfer with Chemical Reaction," Chem. Eng.
Ed., 21, No. 4, 164 (Fall 1987), W. J. Decoursey
refers to Gas Liquid Reactions by P. V. Danck-
werts as a source in English for the seminal pa-
pers by S. Hatta which were published in
Japanese [Technol. Repts. Tokoku University, 8, 1
(1929); 10, 613,630 (1931); and 11, 365, (1932)].
Complete translations of the latter articles have
been published in International Chemical Engi-
neering, 18, 443-475 (1978). The readers of this
article may also be interested to know that a
translation of the closely related pioneering paper
by G. Damkohler, "The Influence of Diffusion,
Fluid Flow and Heat Transport on the Yield in
Chemical Reactors," Der Chemie-Ingenieur, 3,
Part I (1937), has recently been published in
International Chemical Engineering, 28, 132-198

Stuart W. Churchill
University of Pennsylvania


In Memoriam

James J. Christensen

Dr. James J. Christensen's life was devoted to ser-
vice: service to wife and family; service to his profes-
sion in chemical engineering and to the field of ther-
modynamics; service to his university, the Brigham
Young University and to his students, both graduate
and undergraduate; and service to his church and com-
munity. This life of service was brought to a close by
a sudden heart attack on September 5, 1987.
Jim's worldwide recognition as an outstanding
thermodynamicist and a developer and builder of
state-of-the-art calorimeters gave him and his wife a
great opportunity to travel around the world. An out-
standing feature of the family room of their home is a
large map with the continents shown in bas-relief cut
from plywood. The map is studded with pins, indicat-
ing the many places they have gone where they had
the privilege of meeting new people and of teaching
his methods to many. Jim and Virginia shared each
other's life in this way as well as in taking dance clas-
ses together and in participating in the great books
program over the last 28 years. He was dedicated to
his four sons and a daughter and spent many hours
with them in such activities as hiking. One of his sons
followed him into the chemical engineering profession.
Although Jim loved his professional career, he loved
service to his family equally well.
Jim's service to the profession in the field of
calorimetry and thermodynamics is unparalleled. He
received a BS degree in 1953 and an MS degree in
1955 in chemical engineering from the University of
Utah. He then went on to complete his formal educa-
tion with a doctor's degree from Carnegie-Mellon in
1958. Part of his research work involved heat transfer
to coils which later showed up in the design of the
first-class calorimeters which he built. These

calorimeters have been developed commercially, are
sold around the world, and are a standard for making
precise calorimetry measurements. One of Jim's early
ambitions was to build a calorimeter precise enough
to measure the germination of a single seed but his
designs greatly exceeded this. The early designs were
crude compared with the later designs, but still re-
quired corrections for the energy input from a stirrer
motor. His latest design was a calorimeter which
would measure the heat of mixing at high pressure
and high temperature.
Professor Christensen was also a prolific author.
He has written or edited twelve books and co-au-
thored fifteen major review articles. He has also pub-
lished over 250 research articles in a wide variety of
journals. He was instrumental in the founding of inter-
national conferences dealing with the chemistry of
macro-cyclic molecules. He has been recognized by his
peers, who selected him for the Sigma Xi annual lec-
ture, a Blue Key lecture, and the Distinguished Fac-
ulty Annual Lecture at Brigham Young University.
He also received the Maiser Outstanding Research
Award and the Huffman Memorial Award as an out-
standing thermochemist. Last August he was asked
by the Chemical Engineering Division of the Amer-
ican Society of Engineering Education to give the 3M
lecture which is based on outstanding research and
contribution to the profession. (This lecture is sched-
uled for publication in a future issue of CEE).
Jim had a genuine love for his students, both
graduate and undergraduate, and they returned that
love through extra effort. He was recognized three
times by the students as being the outstanding lec-
turer in the department, and he was recognized by
the college as the outstanding teacher with the univer-
sity's Maesar Outstanding Teaching Award (which is
the counterpart of the outstanding research award.)
Jim took great delight in collecting "toys" which
demonstrated the principles of thermodynamics and
used them continually to interest the students. They
included the familiar bird dunking its beak into water,
rotating pinwheels, and his latest acquisition, a motor
which worked by dipping one end in hot water. Jim's
favorite courses were thermodynamics and creativity,
and he exhibited creativity in teaching. He taught the
students new ways of approaching old problems. He
was dynamic in his presentations and gave an ani-
mated demonstration of the energy content of gas
molecules by running back and forth, twirling and
jumping up and down, colliding with students and
walls. Almost every year during the student banquet,
this little demonstration was repeated by the students
as a sign of their regard. His annual backpacking trip


to the Uintah mountains with the graduate students
was a highlight of each year.
He also served his community and church, the
Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, in many
ways. He was active in the education of his children
and in the processes by which parents can contribute
(P.T.A., etc.). He participated in great book discus-
sion groups, he was a cub master for eight years, and
demonstrated his love of teaching by teaching adult
priesthood groups.
Jim's life of personal service has concluded. But
his influence will continue to be felt in the lives of his
family, his students, and his friends for many years to
Dee H. Barker

Roland Andrew Ragatz

Roland Andrew Ragatz, Professor Emeritus of
Chemical Engineering at the University of Wisconsin,
was born in Prairie du Sac, Wisconsin, in 1898, and
died in Madison, Wisconsin, on May 30, 1987, at the
age of 88. He is survived by his wife Nancy, who he
married in 1930, a son Andrew (Ellen), a daughter
Karen Roberts (Burnell), and seven grandchildren.
Professor Ragatz graduated from Prairie du Sac
High School in 1915. He completed his studies for a
BS degree (in the then new discipline of chemical en-
gineering) in 1920 at the University of Wisconsin,
Madison, and was immediately appointed instructor
in chemical engineering. He remained on the teaching
staff at Wisconsin until his retirement in 1969, except
for a one-year leave of absence in 1929-30. While serv-
ing as a full time instructor, Professor Ragatz earned
his MS degree in 1923 and his PhD degree in 1931,
also in chemical engineering. He served as depart-
ment chairman during three periods, totalling sixteen

years, and as associate chairman for five years there-
Professor Ragatz' 49-year period of service to the
University is one of the longest on record. He contri-
buted significantly to his college and department and
to his students during the important early period
when the developing field of chemical engineering was
emerging from an empirical discipline and evolving
into a more scientifically based study. Basically de-
voted to teaching, Roland's areas of interest followed
the needs of the department and its students in pre-
paring them for industrial careers in a variety of often
traditional manufacturing enterprises. In 1920 he
began the development of introductory and advanced
metallography courses, including laboratory studies
related to the microscopic structures of metals, with
emphasis on materials of construction. When instruc-
tion in this area was transferred to the Department
of Mining and Metallurgy in 1948, Professor Ragatz
turned his interest in materials to developing courses
in plastics, again including a laboratory program. This
early attention to materials science established the
foundation on which the department's current strong
program is based.
Starting in 1935, Professor Ragatz joined the late
Olaf A. Hougen (and, during the 1940s, Kenneth M.
Watson) in giving courses in material and energy bal-
ances and in thermodynamics for chemical engineers
and participated in rewriting the corresponding parts
(I and II) of the text Chemical Process Principles,
which long has been a standard work in chemical en-
During his extended service as department chair-
man, Roland alternated with Olaf Hougen, and, in the
words of Professor Hougen, "he assembled a staff well
balanced in special talents for teaching and research,
for undergraduate and graduate instruction, for vari-
ety in engineering and scientific interests, and with
balance in laboratory and classroom instruction."
Roland also served long and efficiently as chairman
of the College of Engineering committee on fellow-
ships and scholarships, as well as on numerous other
committees. He was a long-time member of the
ASEE, serving on its Council, as chairman of its
Chemical Engineering Division, and as organizer of
the important Summer School for Teachers of Chemi-
cal Engineering (at Madison in 1948).
Professor Ragatz exemplified the ideals of the fac-
ulty of the University of Wisconsin: scholarship, re-
search, public service, and above all, teaching.
Roger J. Altpeter
Wayne K. Neill
Charles C. Watson





A Dual Perspective

Wayne State University
Detroit, MI 48202
BASF Corporation
Wyandotte, MI 48192

R RECENT CHEMICAL PLANT accidents in India and
in Switzerland have increased public and indus-
try-wide concern and awareness of safety and loss pre-
vention. This is in spite of the fact that the chemical
process industries are safer than most other industries
[1]. However, due to the potential for a serious plant
accident, both the public and industry recognize that
safety must be increased.
The AICHE is taking considerable steps to im-
prove safety. First, it has formed a Center for Chem-
ical Process Safety with the charge to "address the
concerns about the handling of toxic or reactive mate-
rials and the safety of plant operating procedures" [2].
Second, it has formed the Design Institute for
Emergency Relief Systems (DIERS) User Group to
continue the cooperative industrial activities to extend
the DIERS technology [3]. And third, a Task Force
on Safety and Health in the Undergraduate Cur-
riculum has been formed under the Safety and Health
Division of the AICHE with the major objective to
"identify the key concepts of loss prevention, safety,
and health which should be considered essential for
accreditation of the curriculum by 1990" [4]. As a re-
sult of this new awareness and concern for safety, it
is apparent that safety and loss prevention will be-
come a part of the future undergraduate chemical en-
gineering curriculum.
Most undergraduate chemical engineering cur-
ricula in the United States contain little in the way of
safety and loss prevention. In fact, university
laboratories are, typically, serious safety offenders.
� Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988

Great Britain has had an ambitious safety and loss
prevention program in their undergraduate cur-
riculum for some years now. This is a result of a sub-
stantial chemical process accident that occurred at
Flixborough, England, in 1974 [1]. All British chemi-
cal, engineering curricula are presently required to
contain a significant amount of safety related content
for accreditation. This is achieved through a combina-
tion of dedicated courses or by demonstrating a cer-
tain fraction of safety related content in the existing
This article will provide a dual perspective on the
need for more emphasis on safety in our chemical en-
gineering undergraduate curricula. Both the academic

Daniel A. Crowl is an associate professor of chemical engineering
at Wayne State University. He received his BS degree in fuel science
from the Pennsylvania State University and his MS and PhD in chem-
ical engineering from the University of Illinois. After graduation he
spent two years as a senior process control engineer for St. Regis Paper
Company before returning to academic work. His present research in-
terests are in chemical process safety, process simulation, and the ap-
plication of CAD techniques to process design. (L)
Joseph F. Louvar is director of the Chemical Engineering Depart-
ment (Research and Development) of BASF Corporation, Wyandotte,
MI. A member of AICHE's Loss Prevention Committee, he also teaches
experimental statistics at Wayne State University. He received a PhD
in chemical engineering from Wayne State University, an MSChE from
Carnegie-Mellon University, and a BSChE from the University of Mis-
souri (Rolla). (R)


This article provides[s] a dual perspective on the need for more emphasis on safety in our . . undergraduate
curricula. Both the academic and industrial viewpoints [are] presented. We . . .also discuss a unique safety
related course development effort being undertaken at Wayne State and Michigan Tech Universities ...

and industrial viewpoints will be presented. We will
also discuss a unique safety related course develop-
ment effort being undertaken at Wayne State Univer-
sity and Michigan Technological University, with sub-
stantial technical assistance from BASF Corporation.
This program is being supported by the National Sci-
ence Foundation under its University/Industry/Gov-
ernment (UIG) program.

Dan Crowl
In the summer of 1986 I had an opportunity to
spend a few months at BASF Corporation working on
a computer simulation project. One day I was visited
by Joe Louvar, Director of Chemical Engineering,
who asked me if I was interested in working on a few
safety related projects. In total ignorance I replied,
"You mean hard hats and safety shoes?" Joe went on
to explain some of the more fundamental aspects of
safety, including reactor dynamics, two-phase flow
during reactor venting, gas dispersion models, and so
forth. It had never occurred to me that safety had a
fundamental aspect! I had always assumed safety was
simply a set of rules developed as a result of practical
During the remainder of my stay at BASF, I ob-
served how safety was practiced in an industrial envi-
ronment. It became apparent to me that practicing
chemical engineers spend a considerable amount of
time on safety related activities. In spite of all my
years of academic training, I felt woefully inadequate
with respect to safety. I could indeed understand
pieces of the fundamental components, but using those
pieces in the practical application and management of
safety seemed a mystery to me.
Despite a continuing feeling of inadequacy, I was
now aware of safety. I began to look at my past
academic experiences and at the experiences we are
providing for our present students. I found little in
the way of safety instruction. Many of you will argue
that the academic experience is designed to provide
only a fundamental knowledge, with practical applica-
tion being the responsibility of industry. But safety is
a systems science, involving the application of a broad
range of fundamental skills strongly coupled with
practical application. Why not adjust the fundamental
skills taught to our undergraduates to strengthen the

safety aspect? Can the academic community continue
to neglect an area that is already very important to
the industrial community?
As an undergraduate I learned that process design
is motivated by savings in material usage and capital
investment. In the 1970's energy also became an im-
portant driving force in design. Now, safety consider-
ations are becoming just as important.
The academic community is in a difficult position
with respect to safety. First, most faculty have little
safety experience. This is either a result of little indus-
trial experience or of participation in industry during
a time when safety was a lower priority and was prac-
ticed in a different fashion than it is today. Second,
we have inadequate equipment and facilities for dem-
onstrating safety. Finally, our curricula are already
at their practical maximums. Where can we find room
to add a safety component?
One possibility is to add safety instruction
throughout all of the chemical engineering courses.
Safety is practiced in every aspect of the industrial
experience, so why not practice it throughout the en-
tire undergraduate course sequence? I agree with this
approach. However, a final capstone course is neces-
sary to culminate the course sequence. One can teach
reactor safety (runaway reactors) in the kinetics and
reactor design course, but a capstone course is essen-
tial for the teaching of safety reviews, hazard identifi-
cation, risk assessment, and other topics that are
special to safety.
I recently attended the International Symposium
on Preventing Major Chemical Accidents, organized
by the Center for Chemical Process Safety of the
AICHE. This symposium was held in Washington,
DC, during the week of February 3, 1987. Of the over
four hundred participants, less than five were from
academia. This was surprising since the papers pre-
sented were as fundamental and research-oriented as
those presented at academic conferences. I believe
that safety can become an important academic area if
faculty become aware of 1) the potentially fundamen-
tal nature of safety, and 2) the opportunities for re-
search and funding. Safety is an excellent area for
industry/academic research collaboration since most
of the industrial proprietary barriers dissolve.
Safety is an essential part of the industrial experi-
ence, more now than some of the traditional funda-
mental chemical engineering areas. I believe it is time


to include safety as an important part of the under-
graduate chemical engineering experience as well.

Joe Louvar

All of my safety knowledge has been acquired in
an industrial setting. It came in bits and pieces, and
it took several years to really appreciate the signifi-
cance, the subtlety, and the technical complexity of
chemical process safety. In hindsight, I recognize that
during those formative years I made many serious
safety errors. It was only the result of pure chance

that I escaped having serious accidents and/or in-
Using today's standards, most of my past errors
would have been identified and corrected by supervi-
sion or by the safety review process which is used
very effectively within industry. Unfortunately, I am
convinced that the self-motivation necessary to take
on the responsibility for safety (responsibility of every
engineer), and to learn the technology of safety, still
requires years within an industrial setting.
From a management standpoint I have also recog-
nized that supervision has a serious handicap when
working with fresh graduates. Although they have an

Course Outline

1. Introduction
A. Course syllabus
B. Introduction
C. Accident and loss statistics
D. The accident process
E. Three significant disasters
F. Personal and management responsibilities
G. Legislative responsibilities
H. Employee and community "right to know"
2. Fundamentals of Safety
A. Toxicology, industrial hygiene and exposure control
1. Toxicology
* History
* Dose vs response
* How the body responds to exposure
* Determining safe working levels
2. Industrial hygiene and exposure control
* Types of exposure
* Methods for exposure control
* Administrative and engineering methods
* Personal protection
B. Fires
1. Flammability of vapors and liquids
2. Minimum oxygen concentration
3. Inerting
4. Autoignition temperature
5. Auto-oxidation
6. Adiabatic compression
7. Effects of sprays and mists
C. Explosions
1. Definitions: Explosion, detonation, deflagration, con-
fined and unconfined vapor explosion, BLEVE
2. The nature of the explosion process
3. Effects of explosions
4. Calculations relating to explosions
D. Liquid and Vapor releases
1. Gaussian distribution
2. Gaussian plume model
3. Gaussian puff model

4. Spill models
5. Inhalation exposure: spills or from vessels
6. Inhalation exposure: filling containers
3. Applications for safety
A. Introduction
B. Designing for safety
1. Intrinsic design
2. Extrinsic design
3. Maintenance
C. Engineering to Prevent Fires and Explosions
1. The Fire Triangle
2. Passive Protection Methods
* Types of environments
* Eliminating sources of ignition
* Atmospheric control, including inerting and purging
* Plant siting
3. Active Protection Methods
* Shutoff and check valves
* Combustible gas monitors
* Emergency material transfer
* Sprinkler systems
* Water vs. foams for fire control
D. Engineering to Prevent Toxic Release
1. Relief systems
2. Design and selection of relief valves
3. Flares, vents and scrubbers
E. Process hazards identification and risk assessment
1. Hazards identification
* Hazards surveys, including the Dow Index
2. Risk Assessment
* Event trees
* Fault trees
* Consequences analysis
* Limitations to risk assessment
3. Safety reviews
4. Accident Investigations
5. Case histories


excellent foundation in the traditional chemical en-
gineering fundamentals, the concepts of safety are
foreign to them. In fact, they perceive safety to be
unimportant because the subject is hardly mentioned
during their schooling. In some universities, safety
practices are totally neglected. Consequently, indus-
try starts with graduates who need a basic improve-

Video Session 1

1. Introduction
2. Brief description of five video sessions
3. BASF Corporation's safety program
a. Policy
b. Committments
c. Training
d. Activities
e. Audits
4. Introduction to safety terminology and principles
a. XP vs. non-XP
b. Relief vs. rupture disc
c. Runaway reaction
d. Two phase flow
e. Design Institute for Emergency Relief Systems

Video Session 2

1. Introduction
2. Personal protection equipment
a. Motivation
b. Face and eye protection: glasses, goggles, face shield
c. Clothing: aprons, gloves, suits
d. Respirators: dust, cartridge, canister, air-line
e. Miscellaneous: hats and shoes
3. Sources of toxicity and safety information
a. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS)
b. Vendor information
4. Safety procedures
a. Hot work permits
b. Lock - Tag - Try
c. Vessel entry
d. Grounding and bonding
e. Fail safe
f. Safety reviews
5. Safety features
a. Sprinklers
b. Alarms
c. Showers
d. Color indicator tubes
e. Extinguishers

ment in attitude prior to addressing the more complex
features of safety.
The chemical industry is entering an era where
processes will be even more complex. To prepare our
future engineers for this era, I believe we must begin
to educate them on the principles of safety. This edu-
cation must begin at the university, with an emphasis
equal to heat transfer, mass transfer, ther-
modynamics, etc., and should be given during the
same period as the core courses. This would be an
effective way of emphasizing the importance of safety.
I believe that there should be a three-hour course
during the third year which is dedicated to safety.
Some educators believe that safety should be a part
of every course, and I agree. But the more technically
complex areas of safety need more time and attention
than could possibly be allotted in core courses. The
following subjects could only be adequately covered in
a separate safety course:

* Dispersion studies
* Relief valve sizing (including 2-phase flow)
* Safety reviews and hazard identification
* Flammability of chemicals
* Toxicity of chemicals

The benefits of teaching safety in the university
exceed those mentioned above. An important spin-off
of safety courses could be the development of more
interest in initiating safety-oriented research. In a re-
view of university research (PhD dissertations), it is
apparent that there is very little research devoted to
safety. Topics which could be fruitfully addressed by
universities include:

* Advanced adaptive reactor control methods for hazardous
* Expert systems for monitoring reactor and/or plant safety
* Expert systems to improve the reliability of fault analysis
* Advanced relief methods for runaway two-phase flow sys-

From my perspective, the chemical industry will
continue to stress faster reactions, more complex
reaction systems, and a more complex utilization of
investments via multiple product reactor systems.
The success of these complex processes will depend
upon our ability to design modern systems with the
safety features demanded by both industry and the
public. To meet these challenges of the future, we
must give more attention, concern, and respect to





We have developed a senior level course entitled
"Safety in the Chemical Process Industries." This
development effort was supported by the National
Science Foundation under their UIG program. The
unique feature of the course was that it included five
two-hour lectures, broadcast live from the chemical
pilot plant facilities at BASF Corporation in Wyan-
dotte, MI. The format supported interactive question-
ing between the students in the classroom and the
practicing chemical engineering professionals in the
pilot plant. The broadcasts were uplinked to a satellite
for downlinking at both Wayne State University in
Detroit and Michigan Technological University in the
upper peninsula. The course was taught simultane-
ously at both locations during the fall of 1987.
The course provided a rare opportunity for stu-
dents to see safety being practiced by professional
chemical engineers in an actual chemical plant envi-
ronment. Demonstrations were provided using actual
equipment and safety situations that could never be
shown in the classroom or laboratory. The video lec-
tures were in addition to a series of 25 one and one-half
hour classroom lectures. These lectures presented the
fundamental and theoretical features of safety, sub-
jects requiring problem solving and discussion within
the classroom environment.

Video Session 3
1. Introduction
2. Inspection concepts
3. Review film on Stop - Observe - Act - Report (SOAR)
4. Inspection of laboratory (several examples of poor safety
practices will be staged)
a. Storage of solvents
b. Storage of glass equipment
c. Safety equipment and operation
d. Principles of using hoods
5. Inspection of Process Development (PD) area (several ex-
amples of poor safety practices will be staged)
a. Reliefs and rupture discs
b. Nitrogen vented in room
c. Non-XP in XP room
d. Poor grounds
e. Belts not guarded
f. Bad drum vent
g. Incorrect tools
h. Poor ventilation
i. No double block and bleed (show correct configuration
via glass system)
j. No hot-work permit

A total of four industrial and seven academic con-
tributors were involve with the effort. The BASF
Corporation industrial participants were: G. W.
Boicourt, M. Capraro, J. F. Louvar, and J. Strick-
land. Their effort was directed mostly towards the
video lecture material and scripts. J. F. Louvar also
contributed towards the development of lecture mate-
rial. The academic participants were D. A. Crowl and
R. W. Powitz from Wayne State University and M.
Banks, B. A. Barna, E. R. Fisher, N. K. Kim, and D.
G. Leddy from Michigan Technological University.
The major focus of the academic group was toward

Video Session 4

1. Introduction
2. Vent Sizing Package (VSP) for sizing reliefs
a. Show features of equipment
b. Show types of data collected
c. Illustrate specific tests for various objectives
d. Introduce relief valve sizing concepts
3. Characterizing dusts
a. Deflagration index
b. Illustrate features of equipment
c. Describe test procedures
d. Describe data from tests
e. Introduce relief sizing concepts
4. Flammability limits
a. Illustrate features of equipment
b. Describe test procedures
c. Describe data from tests
d. Introduce relief sizing concepts

Video Session 5

1. Introduction
2. Informal safety review in laboratory
a. Describe phosgenation system
b. Analyze procedures relevant to safety
c. Progressively make improvements via team dialogue
3. Formal safety review
a. Introduction
b. Safety Review Meeting
c. Equipment inspection
d. Wrap-up meeting and development of Action Plan
4. Wrap-up of video sessions
a. Summary remarks
b. Open questions and answers


development of the lecture materials. The overall pro-
ject was managed by D. A. Crowl.
The course outline is shown in Table 1. It is divided
into two major parts. The first part presents the fun-
damentals of safety and includes discussions of tox-
icology, fire, explosion, and toxic release. The second
part deals with using those fundamentals in practice
and includes a discussion of "designing for safety" and
using various safety review procedures (such as
hazards and operability studies). The course also in-
cludes a discussion on case histories and accident in-
The outlines for the five video lectures are shown
in Tables 2 through 6. Except for video session 4, the
videos are not dependent on the lecture material. The
emphasis of the videos was to show the students how
safety is practiced on real process equipment. The
fourth video lecture on "Experiments for Safety" re-
quired some fundamental lecture material prior to

This paper has presented both the industrial and
university perspectives regarding the need for teach-
ing safety in the chemical engineering undergraduate
curriculum. We have also presented one approach to
teaching safety and loss prevention. As a result of
NSF support we had a unique opportunity to bring
the students into an operating chemical pilot plant,
through the use of live TV.
We hope that this approach, and others, will im-
prove the engineers of the future and result in safer
chemical process plants.

1. Lees, F. P., Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Butter-
worths, Boston (1986).
2. Anonymous, AICHE Environmental Division Newsletter,
February, 1986.
3. Fisher, H. G., "DIERS Research Program on Emergency Re-
lief Systems," Chemical Engineering Progress, August (1985).
4. Glass, Arnold J., Letter of February 2, 1986. O

IM book reviews

by John J. Aklonis, William J. MacKnight
John Wiley & Sons, Somerset, NJ 08873; $39.95 (1983)
Reviewed by Albert Co
University of Maine
This book introduces various fundamental concepts
in studying the viscoelastic behavior of polymers, with
an emphasis on the molecular approach. The book con-
sists of nine chapters.
Chapter 1 introduces the reader to several exper-
iments that display the viscoelastic nature of poly-
mers. In Chapter 2, viscoelastic material properties
in transient and oscillatory experiments are defined
and are illustrated clearly with simple experiments.
The Boltzmann superposition principle is stated; its
applications in relating the creep compliance and the
stress relaxation modulus and in relating transient
and oscillatory properties are demonstrated.
In Chapter 3 the regions of viscoelastic behavior
are described and the effects of molecular weight,
crystallinity, and plasticizing agents are explained.
The concept of time-temperature superposition, the
master curves, and the WLF equation are then pre-
sented. In Chapter 4, the phenomenon of glass trans-
ition is examined, and explanations based on free vol-
ume, thermodynamics, and kinetic theories are pre-
sented. The effects of structural parameters on glass

transition temperature and the relaxation occurring
in the glassy state are rationalized in terms of molecu-
lar motion and chain mobility. In preparing the reader
for subsequent chapters, the statistics of a polymer
chain are reviewed in Chapter 5.
In Chapter 6, various treatments of rubber elastic-
ity and the structural factors that affect rubber elas-
ticity are discussed. In Chapter 7, the behavior of typ-
ical mechanical models is analyzed and the Rouse-
Zimm molecular theories for polymer solutions are
discussed. Extensions of these molecular theories to
bulk polymers are then considered and the reputation
theories are briefly described. In Chapters 8 and 9,
the phenomena of dielectric relaxation and chemical
stress relaxation are examined, respectively.
Throughout the book, the mathematical treat-
ments are maintained at a level comfortable for under-
graduates. Advanced mathematics required for the
discussion of a subject matter are elaborated in the
corresponding appendices. The problems at the end of
each chapter range from simple calculations to ad-
vanced problems requiring a certain degree of
mathematical sophistication. Readers will find the so-
lutions located at the end of the book to be helpful.
Overall, this book is an excellent introduction to
polymer viscoelasticity. However, the treatise is re-
stricted to amorphous polymers. The treatment on
crystalline polymers is very limited, and topics such
as solution behavior, melt rheology, and birefringence
are not covered. Nevertheless, it is a good choice as
a textbook for one of a series of courses on polymer
viscoelasticity. [


M N curriculum


A Course to Minimize Functional Handicaps of Graduates

University of Oklahoma
Norman, OK 73019

dergone significant changes since 1982. Some of
the changes have been initiated by recent intensive
overseas competition, some by the drop in oil prices,
and some by mergers. In the 'right sizing,' or downsiz-
ing, that has taken place in most companies in this
decade in order to maintain competitiveness, whole
layers of management have been expunged. Other
changes resulted from technological developments in
the late 1970s and in the first half of this decade. De-
velopments in computer workstations and software
have added such power to the individual engineer that
companies in chemical processing and the engineering
companies serving them will never again need as
many engineers of any discipline for the same volume
of business as they needed in the 1975 era. As a conse-
quence, there has been a reduction in hiring by most

Rex T. Ellington has been professor of chemical engineering at the
University of Oklahoma for five years, after nine years at IGT (Illinois
Tech) and nearly thirty years in industry. He received his BS (ChE) from
the University Colorado and the MGT, MS (ChE), and PhD from IIT. He
held research and general management positions in Sinclair Oil, At-
lantic Richfield, and Transco Energy and had project management po-
sitions in Sinclair, Transco, Fluor Engineers and Constructors and Occi-
dental. Along the way, he had a private consulting practice for a year.
His teaching has concentrated on senior design, process control, and
engineering management.

companies, with the result that many students have
not been able to find jobs even months after gradua-
tion. Competition for the available jobs has become
intense, and many young engineers have had to go
into fields where they may never be able to use their
hard-won training. The purpose of this paper is to
review a course, "Engineering Management," that has
been developed at the University of Oklahoma to im-
prove the students' ability to get jobs and to perform
better in any company.
Important technical consequences of the industrial
changes which were described in a recent article in
this journal [1] agree with my own observations as a
senior manager that

* A smaller percentage of all engineers, especially in larger
companies, will be able to move into management.
* All engineers will have to be more competent technically
and to remain competent longer before they can become
* While they practice their specialty, engineers will have to
function more effectively in a company environment to
have job security.
* Engineers will need far greater organization- and people-
skills than past graduates possessed.

The needs represented by the last item have been
voiced by every industrial advisory group that I have
known or been a part of in the last twenty years.
As soon as recruiters identify a lack of understand-
ing of the industrial environment and an obvious lack
of people-skills in interviewees, they lose interest.
These graduates may never get an engineering job,
or they may be shuffled aside at an early date. As
recently as April 1987, senior managers advising our
department told about students who were essentially
unemployable, no matter what their GPA, because of
their obvious lack of people-skills. The student needs
to understand how the industrial world operates and
should develop people-skills before leaving college so
he/she can function effectively immediately after
being hired. Costs are simply too high for businesses
� Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988


to tolerate a one-year shakedown period for new en-
gineers, as they did in the past.
Another educational need is based on the convic-
tion of most senior managers that learning to manage
is a lifetime job. This learning process must be started
very early by engineers in order to meet the greater
competition for managerial positions or they will be
left behind, and business majors will skim off an even
larger share of the top jobs in the future.

C. T. Sciance [1] cites a significant need to aug-
ment the technical content of the chemical engineering
curriculum, but it could be even more important to
improve people-skills and knowledge of how industry
functions. Many students gravitate toward engineer-
ing because their natural aptitudes lie more in math
and science and less in communication and interper-
sonal relations. Throughout their engineering study
this uneveness in skills probably increases. Students
are shocked to find, while being interviewed or upon
being hired, that the practice of engineering is a very
people-oriented profession. They soon realize they are
woefully unprepared in many areas that could affect
career achievement even more than their calculation
ability. A serious gap in their education soon becomes
The effects of the new employment environment
have only lately reached the universities in the form
of reduced job opportunities, but few changes have
been made in the educational program in response to
the needs of those now graduating and to the next
generation of students. Why has the gap in organiza-
tional know-how not been filled? Many professors
have no industrial experience, or it was of such short
duration, or at such a junior level, that they do not
know what is really involved and are uncomfortable
trying to teach such material. They may agree with
the need, but they lack the tools to deal with it.
An effort has been underway at the University of
Oklahoma to develop a local solution to the problem
for students willing to devote three semester hours to
the effort, and to draft a text which could be used by
other faculties. Further, we hope that the text might
ultimately become a desktop reference which will be
consulted more frequently than many technical refer-

Ideas for this course have gestated for more than
a decade, through thousands of goal-settings, perfor-
mance reviews, hirings, firings, and many mistakes

The course then becomes one of high
student-participation. Basic value systems are
discussed to help the student understand why
others react to life's inputs differently
than the student himself does.

by the author. They came from fellow executives of
all ages who urged that students be made aware of
the things that cause so much difficulty in industry
and handicap so many careers. Time and time again,
the root causes of those difficulties are poor communi-
cation and lack of interpersonal relation ability, in-
adequate knowledge of company workings, or dis-
torted concepts of management. Lately, new ideas
have come as feedback from recent graduates.
This is a course in what life is really like "out
there." Many of the rough edges have been ground
off. Attendance has been interdisciplinary, and the
first results have been good. Feedback and requests
from earlier graduates have resulted in the develop-
ment of a text. Graduates have already reported on
more comfort in working in team situations, a greater
ability to determine supervisors' needs by quickly de-
termining how an organization works, and less fear of
moving into project work immediately. These results
suggest that the effort is moving in the right direction.
The first draft of the text was developed to meet
classroom needs and it is outlined in Table 1. The first
part of the course is very important for the student
and new graduate. It starts with a brief perspective
of the entire course and then presents a view of the
types of behavior and functioning expected of all em-
ployees. The characteristics of effective employees
and good supervisors are discussed. There are numer-
ous "horrible examples" to awaken the student to
things that can happen which develop a bad reputa-
tion. The intent is to open the student's mind to the
concepts that lead to being an effective person.
The course then becomes one of high student-par-
ticipation. Basic value systems are discussed to help
the student understand why others react to life's in-
puts differently than the student himself does. In the
main, students seek the company of peers and cliques
with whom they are comfortable. It is often a shock
for them to realize that they may have to get along
and work with people who see life differently. The
value system is a convenient mechanism for identify-
ing differences in reaction to one's environment.
Next, attention turns to getting a job-the right
job for the individual. The student is taught how to
take full, personal charge of job-finding. Careful as-
sessment of the student's attributes leads to the de-


velopment of lists of job opportunities, location of
target companies, investment of significant time on
company research, and improved communication in
resumes and interviews. Effort is expended to
heighten the student's awareness of his/her impact on
recruiters, interviewers, and other people during
plant trips.
Then, important things that the newly employed
engineer should consider in order to get the best pos-
sible start on the job are reviewed. These are obvious
truisms, but they are often overlooked or ignored.

It is necessary to develop a different
frame of mind in the students in order to attack
the deficiency in communication ability which
is mentioned by nearly all supervisors.

Some of the most important areas concern the study
of personal ethics, business ethics, technical and intel-
lectual property of a company, liability problems (to
give the student perspective regarding what must be
protected), and obligations during and after employ-
ment. Then they examine one problem all of them will
encounter some day in some way: whistle blowing.
Moral obligations are analyzed in detail.
It is necessary to develop a different frame of mind
in the students in order to attack the deficiency in
communication ability which is mentioned by nearly
all supervisors. Communication theory is examined
briefly to learn why some of the best intentions go
awry in speaking and writing. Throughout the course
there are opportunities to make brief formal presenta-
tions, and each is critiqued by the class for its organi-
zation and delivery. At least one presentation is re-
peated several times in order to force the individual
to revise and improve it. Written assignments are re-
quired frequently. The student is taught to observe
audience awareness, whatever the occasion.
The true function of management is examined next
and it proves to be a revelation for many students. As
a result, some students are less anxious to become
managers, but at the same time they develop a better
appreciation of the needs of supervisors and mana-
gers. To help the student understand his/her new en-
vironment, subjects such as types of company organi-
zation, job descriptions, job evaluations, goal setting
for individuals, performance reviews, and merit
budgeting are taken up. Leadership types are
examined in some detail so that young employees can
better characterize the behavior of supervisors and
work with individuals more effectively. Equal employ-
ment opportunity requirements are carefully dis-

cussed to help people avoid problems and/or to insure
that their rights are observed.
The added awareness provided by these subjects
makes the student a better employee. People who
have had the course seem to get a faster start on the
job and to have an edge on the competition-befitting
the adage, "If at first you don't succeed, you may
never." They are more aware of the importance of
fitting into group activities, have greater empathy for
a supervisor's needs, and are able to develop a per-
sonal program for advancement at an early date. The
rate of return for the time and money invested in this
part of the course appears to be very high.

The middle section of the course deals with modern
methods of modeling, planning, and analysis. Tech-
niques and sophistication vary widely from company
to company, so the treatment provides a look at the
utility of these tools without taking a course in opera-
tions research or a business course in modeling. Each
method is examined from a management rather than
a program writer's viewpoint, to show how the analyst
and manager must work together and how model com-
puter outputs or "decisions" are used. General
economics and spreadsheets are reviewed quickly to
provide the basis for economic decisions. Reading and
analysis of company financial reports is stressed as an
ability that every young engineer should have. The
linear programming, which is one of the most widely-
used optimization aids-from refinery operation to
vegetable planting-is taken through graphical inter-
pretation, matrix methods, analysis of computer out-
puts, and sensitivity studies. Study of integer pro-
gramming provides the basis for analyzing supply,
transportation, and other networks. Among these are
the critical path and PERT techniques. Next, the stu-
dent is presented with the structural basis for making
decisions on a more rational basis. Decision theory
considers the different paths electable in solving a
problem and deals with the probable cost or conse-
quence of picking each. Several types of business
examples are used.
Reliability analysis is a field which the Japanese
have adopted more widely than we have in the U.S.
for a number of years. Failure, repairability, main-
tainability, and availability are taken up in terms of
process plant units and design for reliability. This
leads to consideration of risk analysis, fault trees, and
failure mode and effect analysis. The fact that the
rigor of the methods clarifies thinking is immediately
clear. Results of these analyses do no good in the files,


however, and emphasis is placed on continued think-
ing by those involved in operations in order to prevent
future catastrophes such as those which have occurred
in the last decade.
By this time, students realize the limitations of
deterministic inputs to models. Distributions are con-
sidered for input values, and Monte Carlo methods
are applied to such things as cost estimates and se-
quential operation simulations. This section of the
course provides a new awareness and perspective of
tools most engineering students have not seen before.
With this awareness comes the ability to help super-
visors through the use of tools lacking in other en-
gineers and the ability to sharpshoot with further
study when the time comes.

Since so many tasks in business and engineering
are of a project nature, the third part of the course
treats management of projects from beginning to end.
Few young engineers know how projects get started;
therefore, design bases, requests for proposals, pro-
posals, contracts, and agreements are carefully re-

Table of Contents

PART I. Functioning with People in Organizations
1. Introduction
2. Value Systems
3. Getting the Correct Job
4. Ethics, Technical Property and Legal Issues
5. Getting Along on the Job
6. Communication
7. Functions of Management
8. Company Organization
9. Managing People
PART II. Planning and Analysis Methods
10. General Economics
11. Linear Programming
12. Integer Programming and Networks
13. Decision Theory
14. Reliability, Fault Trees, FMEA
15. Probabalistic and Simulation Models
PART III. Work Management (Project Basis)
16. Project Initiation
17. Project Organization/Kickoff
18. Engineering and Detailed Design
19. Equipment and Material Procurement
20. Time and Money control
21. Quality Assurance
22. Construction and Manufacture
23. Project Completion

viewed and discussed to show that projects don't "just
happen." A typical project is organized and engineer-
ing and detailed design activities are defined. Project
activities and individual engineering discipline ac-
tivities are related to total project progress curves,
with emphasis on the interrelationship of activities.
Probability of success on any project is related to the
amount of planning, to the handling of details, and to
the accuracy of measurements that go into it. All pro-
curement activities (spec sheets, inquiries, bids, bid
tabs, vendor selection, expediting, inspection, vendor
data acquisition, and transport) are put into time per-
spective. Time and money control discussions involve
activity definition, loading of effort on activities, crit-
ical path analysis, time and cost estimates, and cost
control. Emphasis is placed on the need to measure
progress in the same terms as the original estimate
for accurate progress reporting. Product and service
quality assurance needed for better reliability,
maximum productivity, and lower costs in the face of
overseas competition, provide background for treat-
ment of construction or manufacturing and project
At the end of this section, many students under-
stand the unusual characteristics of good project en-
gineers. Although they may not want to enter this
specialty, they can function much more effectively on
any project and realize the benefit of a project-man-
age-approach to their own lives.

Obviously, many topics are treated quickly, and
not all are treated every semester. But the objective
is perspective and development of the "big picture"
viewpoint. With this, the young engineer knows
where to dig when the need for details of a given
method or topic arises. Over the years, the author has
found that the engineer who has this perspective is
most often the one who defines the problem correctly
and comes up with the needed solution at the right
time, i.e., is the most promotable individual.
The chapter listing for the text is given in Table
1. Comments and ideas from educators or indus-
trialists are always welcome. As a veteran project
manager, the author's primary interest is improving
the product and serving the customer (the student
and the employer).

1. Sciance, C. T., "Chemical Engineering in the Future," Chem.
Eng. Ed., XXI, No. 1, Winter 1987. [



I curriculum


North Carolina State University
Raleigh, NC 27695

N THE ONGOING debate about what should be put
in and taken out of the chemical engineering cur-
riculum, one of the few points of universal agreement
is that oral communication skills are essential for all
practicing engineers and not enough is done to develop
them in most engineering curricula.
Like many other departments, we used to have a
senior seminar course in which each student presented
a single 30-45 minute talk sometime during the semes-
ter. The results were not particularly impressive: the
students whom you would have expected to give good
talks gave them; the other talks ranged from poor to
average; evaluations were superficial; and the one-
shot nature of the talks provided little opportunity for
individual improvement. Also, the worst of the talks,
being as long as 45 minutes, were excruciating experi-
ences for everyone involved.
When Harold Hopfenberg became Department
Head eight years ago, one of the first changes he in-
troduced was a complete reorganization of the seminar
course. Under the new system the senior class is di-
vided into groups of six to eight students and a faculty
member is assigned to each group. The groups meet
once a week for most of the semester. Each faculty
member runs the seminar in any way he or she
chooses; the next section describes a structure that
has worked particularly well for the author.

Each student prepares and delivers two talks dur-
ing the course. Talks in the first round are each fifteen

. . . one of the first changes [Harold Hopfenberg]
introduced was a complete reorganization of the
seminar course. Under the new system the senior
class is divided into groups of six to eight students
and a faculty member is assigned to each group.

0 Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988

Richard M. Felder is a professor of ChE at N.C. State, where he has
been since 1969. He received his BChE at City College of C.U.N.Y. and
his PhD from Princeton. He has worked at the A.E.R.E., Harwell, and
Brookhaven National Laboratory, and has presented courses on chem-
ical engineering principles, reactor design, process optimization, and
radioisotope applications to various American and foreign industries
and institutions. He is coauthor of the text Elementary Principles of
Chemical Processes (Wiley, 1986).

minutes long for a 50-minute class period and twenty
minutes long for a 75-minute period. Talks in the sec-
ond round are ten minutes long.
The first meeting is organizational. The instructor
explains the course structure and hands out and re-
views a list of suggestions for good presentations (to
be given subsequently in this paper). He then lists all
of the dates on which the course will meet and re-
quests volunteers for the first two presentations, to
be given two weeks from the current date. If there
are volunteers the rest of the calendar can usually be
filled in on a voluntary basis; if not, a lottery is used
to assign presentation dates.
In the second period the instructor delivers an il-
lustrative seminar. He begins by explaining that he
has been giving technical talks for a long time and the
students should not expect to be able to duplicate his
skill at this stage of the game. He adds that even
experienced speakers can find room for improvement,
and he requests that the students take notes on things
that might be improved in the presentation. He then


He provides no real introduction but launches directly into a long monologue read verbatim from notes. He
shows a crudely drawn flow chart with no units or streams labeled; several data plots with no apparent
relationship to anything; and one transparency that looks like a facsimile of the Dead Sea Scrolls ...
no eyecontact is made; and gum is chewed continuously and ostentatiously.

proceeds to give the worst talk he can possibly give.
He provides no real introduction but launches directly
into a long monologue read verbatim from notes. He
shows a crudely drawn flow chart with no units or
streams labeled; several data plots with no apparent
relationship to anything; and one transparency that
looks like a facsimile of the Dead Sea Scrolls, filled
from top to bottom with handwritten equations in tiny
print. The talk is crammed with undefined technical
jargon; no eye contact is ever made; and gum is
chewed continuously and ostentatiously. The speaker
concludes by fumbling around with his transparencies
and then muttering, "Well, I guess that's about it."
The talk lasts for approximately eight minutes and
by the end of it the students have all caught on to
what is happening. The class then brainstorms the
things that were wrong about the talk and what
should have been done differently. The instructor sub-
sequently gives a coherent version of the same talk,
complete with introduction, body, summary, and in-
telligible transparencies, and the class briefly discus-
ses the things that made a difference relative to the
first presentation.
At least one week before students are scheduled
to present their talk they are required to submit a
topic. They may talk about published papers or about
work they did on projects or summer jobs; the only
ground rule is that the talks should be reasonably
heavy in technical content at a level appropriate for
chemical engineering seniors. The instructor reviews
the chosen topics and tells the students either to go
ahead with them or to find alternatives with more
technical content. During the week before the presen-
tation the students write, duplicate, and hand out
seminar announcements and abstracts to the instruc-
tor and to all group members.
A typical class session begins with the presenta-
tion of the first talk. During the talk the class mem-
bers jot down questions about the content and com-
ments on the presentation. A five-minute questioning
period follows the talk. The students and instructor
then fill out a checklist rating various aspects of the
talk (introduction, body, and summary; level of the
material presented; use of time; quality of transparen-
cies; clarity of presentation; speaking style; strong and
weak points of the talk). Finally, the students and the
instructor each present brief oral critiques. The

checklists are given to the speaker to review and are
handed in to the instructor at the following class ses-
sion. The procedure is then repeated for the second
Since the course was last offered the department
has acquired a videotaping facility. In the future, each
talk will be taped and the students will be requested
to view their presentations and critique themselves.

Preparation and Organization
* Know the technical background of your audience and gear
your talk to that level. Do not use a lot of unexplained
technical jargon unless you are sure the audience already
knows what it means, and don't explain what a material
balance is to a group of chemical engineering seniors.
* Make sure your talk has a distinct introduction (outline
what you are going to say and why it might be important
or interesting to your audience), a body, and a summary
(repeat what you particularly want your audience to retain
from the talk).
* Use overhead transparencies or slides to present main
points and provide explanatory details in the talk. Trans-
parencies work well for informal seminars, and you can
easily make them yourself. Slides are more difficult to pro-
duce, but they are often more convenient for short tightly-
timed presentations and they are required at some national
and regional conferences.
* Never present a large body of information orally without
summarizing its main points on a transparency.
* Do not present more than about eight lines on a single
transparency. Transparencies crowded with information
are useless. It should take about two minutes to go through
a single transparency in the talk.
* Use large type on transparencies-a label maker or the
Orator ball on a Selectric typewriter or a word processing
program with variable type size. Ordinary size type doesn't
look good. If you handwrite the transparency, use large
block lettering with horizontal guidelines to keep your
lines straight. Never use script unless you're Octave
* If you show a process flow chart, make sure the units and
streams are labeled. A bunch of unlabeled boxes and lines
with arrows is worthless to the audience.
* Try to avoid complex equations, which can rarely be
explained intelligibly in the amount of time available. If
you are talking about a mathematical model, focus on
what it does (input and output variables, assumptions) and
provide, at most, qualitative summaries of the mathemati-
cal and computational details. (If listeners want more de-


tails they can ask you for them in the question period.)
* If you show data plots be sure the axes are clearly labeled.
* Rehearse your talk several times with a friend or in front
of your mirror, and make sure the time it takes is within
one minute of the time allotted for the talk. Running long
can be a disaster in a formal presentation and running
short may not win you any friends if you're at a meeting
where consecutive talks are scheduled at set times.

* Never read directly from prepared text-there is nothing
more deadly to an audience.
* Make frequent eye contact with your audience throughout
the talk. Do not stare at your notes or at the screen.
* Sound enthusiastic about your subject, or at least in-
terested in it. Do not speak in a monotone. Gesture occa-
sionally. If you seem bored by your material you can be
guaranteed your audience will follow your lead.
* Make sure your watch is visible and check it occasionally
to see how the time is running. If you see you are running
short or long, try to adjust the speed of your presentation
to compensate.

The improvements in the student presentations as
the semester progresses are clear and frequently
dramatic. Almost invariably poor speakers become
adequate, adequate speakers become good, and good
speakers become better. During the past six years a
student from our department has won the regional
AIChE student chapter paper award competition
three times. We can't prove it, but we are convinced
that the seminar course has a lot to do with this re-
The oral critiques are a valuable and interesting
part of the course. The natural student tendency is
to be excessively polite, to avoid criticizing harshly
lest they themselves come in for the same treatment
when it's their turn to speak. As a result, in the first
few sessions the principal burden of criticism falls on
the instructor. However, as the semester pro-
gresses the student criticisms become more and more
germane and incisive, although courtesy is always ap-
propriately retained. (We are Southern here, after
all.) By the end of the semester the instructor is al-
most redundant: the points he is prepared to make in
his critique are usually made first by the students.
Requiring each student to give a fifteen- or
twenty-minute talk and subsequently a ten-minute
talk seems to work very well. It is usually difficult
(even for seasoned professionals) to present a signifi-
cant body of technical material in twenty minutes;

having to do so provides the students with excellent
practice in preparing technical seminars such as those
at national AIChE meetings. Cutting the material
down to ten minutes presents a whole different set of
problems, as the students quickly discover. The latter
exercise is good preparation for, say, company staff
meetings at which many people must summarize their
work in a relatively short time.
Finally, it is critically important for the course in-
structor to remember that the students taking the
course are particularly vulnerable: they are nervous
about public speaking in general and they are espe-
cially not used to being publicly critiqued. If the criti-
cism is destructive or unduly harsh, or seemingly arbi-
trary and unfair, the course has the potential of doing
much more harm than good. However, as long as the
instructor establishes firm ground rules about criti-
cism and takes the lead himself in creating a suppor-
tive environment, the course can be among the most
positive and rewarding educational experiences the
students experience in their academic careers. D

book reviews

by L.L. Hegedus, A.T. Bell, N.Y. Chen, W.O. Haag,
J. Wei, R. Aris, M. Boudart, B.C. Gates, and G.B.
John Wiley & Sons, Somerset, NJ 08873; 288 pages,
$47.50 (1987)
Reviewed by
R. J. Gorte
University of Pennsylvania
While there are a number of books on catalysis, it
is very difficult to find a book which gives a balanced
presentation of the many topics in this field. The prob-
lem is that everyone working in catalysis has a differ-
ent view of what the subject is and what is important.
People working in surface physics view catalysts as
adsorption on single crystals in ultra-high vacuum,
mathematical modellers view it as concentration and
temperature gradients across a catalyst pellet, and
traditional workers in catalysis view it as the turnover
number or selectivity for a reaction carried out over
a fixed bed. While not written specifically as a
textbook, Catalyst Design: Progress and Perspectives
has tried to give an overview of work carried out by


all types of catalyst researchers by bringing together
leaders from several of the important areas in the field
and having each write a brief review of the important
aspects of their particular area.
The book itself is a series of short review articles,
each written by a different author. The first chapter,
written by L.L. Hegedus, very briefly discusses the
continued importance of heterogeneous catalysis to in-
dustrial practice and lists the applications which uti-
lize the largest quantities of catalysts.
A microscopic viewpoint of catalysis on single-
crystal, metal surfaces is presented by G.A. Somorjai
in Chapter 2. The work cited is mainly from Professor
Somorjai's own research and discusses the results of
reaction and adsorption studies on single crystals, in-
cluding topics such as the importance of crystallo-
graphic structure for reactions on metals and the influ-
ence of surface modifiers on several example reac-
tions. It should be noted, however, that some of the
conclusions reached in this chapter are still controver-
sial within the surface science community.
The third chapter provides a discussion of sup-
ported, organometallic clusters by B.C. Gates. The
chapter begins with a review of catalysis by transition
metal clusters and continues with a discussion of work
carried out to anchor these compounds to a support.
This second part reviews the synthesis of supported
complexes and concentrates on the spectroscopic tech-
niques which have been utilized in characterizing
these catalysts. Following the section on synthesis
and characterization is a discussion of the catalytic
properties for several example catalytic systems.
Chapter 4, by A.T. Bell, is a review of supported
metal catalysis, with an emphasis on the effect that
the support can have on the metal. The chapter re-
views a wide range of topics, including support acid-
ity, preparation procedures for introducing metals
onto a support, and the influence that a support can
have on a metal's adsorption and reaction properties.
Most of this last section involves a discussion of the
unusual properties which can be observed with titania
supported metals. It should be noted that Professor
Bell presents certain conclusions concerning the role
of titania which are still being debated in the litera-
A discussion of reaction kinetics and the design of
catalytic cycles is given in Chapter 5 by M. Boudart.
Since most reactions involve several elementary
steps, Professor Boudart suggests ways for logically
designing catalysts assuming that the intermediate

steps can be selectively altered by judicious choice of
catalyst or operating conditions.
W.O. Haag and N.Y. Chen have written a review
of acid catalysis by zeolites in Chapter 6. Their chap-
ter starts by describing what zeolites are, followed by
a discussion of zeolite properties including sorption
behavior, diffusional phenomena, and catalytic activ-
ity. The chapter includes a concise introduction to
preparation methods for zeolites, to techniques for
characterization of the acid sites, and to methods for
changing zeolite acidity. Following this introduction,
the role of zeolites in several commercial processes is
described, with a particular emphasis on the impor-
tance of molecular shape selectivity in those proces-
ses. The chapter ends with an overview of the design
principles which were incorporated into the develop-
ment of the first zeolite hydrocarbon cracking
The section on mathematical modelling of trans-
port properties in catalysis, Chapter 7, was written
by R. Aris. The chapter begins with the history be-
hind calculations of catalyst effectiveness and follows
with a tutorial on how to determine the influence of
catalyst geometry, reaction kinetics, and other factors
on the observed reaction rates. The chapter includes
a short section on methods for controlling the distribu-
tion of catalytic activity within a catalyst pellet and
concludes with a discussion of rate multiplicities and
The final chapter, written by J. Wei, presents the
design considerations used for hydrodemetallation
catalysts. The chapter begins by introducing the
reader to the complex structure of metal-containing
molecules which are present in petroleum. The rest of
the chapter reviews the problems associated with de-
hydrodemetallation in the presence of hydrodesulfuri-
zation and discusses the principles used to design
catalysts which have a high activity for long periods
of time.
Over all, this book provides a good review of a
wide range of topics in heterogeneous catalysis. While
the book could be used as a text for a course in
catalysis, it would be necessary to provide supplemen-
tary materials to provide background on the different
techniques which are discussed. As with any book on
topics for which research is ongoing, one should not
consider any of the chapters as being the final word.
However, each section does provide a good beginning
for the interested reader. There is clearly a need for
a book of this type. E


1[6 Y classroom


Federal University at Uberldndia
38400 Uberldndia MG - Brazil
220* F t.-n,
TEXTBOOKS WRITTEN FOR chemical engineering
core courses do not generally provide links be-
tween the theory presented and industrial practice of
process engineering. Many surprises are waiting for
students in the plant environment. We have found
that this situation can be considerably improved by
incorporating flow sheet conception into the lecture
program, mainly in unit operations and design
courses. The flow sheet forces the student to consider ("1 .
a particular piece of equipment in its true industrial
context where it ties in with utilities and basic control
strategy. The method not only motivates students to
participate creatively, but it also generates questions
on process engineering logic that are a welcome en-
richment of class activity. This paper will illustrate
with examples how students can be induced to ask T -
these questions and to find answers to them. op�e


To illustrate the calculations for heat transfer to
jacketed tank reactors, we went through an example
solved in a well-known textbook [1]. Knowing the heat

Manfred Fehr received his BS (1967) from the Universite Laval, his
MS (1969) from the University of Alberta, and his PhD (1977) from
University Laval. He is a registered professional engineer in Alberta,
Quebec, Sao Paulo and Minas Gerais. After short industrial experiences
in Canada and Germany, he lectured at various South American uni-
versities and is now engineering consultant and professor at the Fed-
eral University, Uberl6ndia, Brazil. His research interests are in the
area of local energy sources.

FIGURE 1. Steam supply to reactor jacket. Above: book
approach. Below: flow sheet approach.

load and the available surface, the steam temperature
required in the jacket is found to be 220�F. The sub-
ject matter of the book goes this far, but thinking that
this was not a real challenge to my students, I went
on to speak some process language: our plant has two
steam headers, 50 psig and 150 psig, and a condensate
return header at 20 psig. I asked the students to pre-
pare a flow sheet with enough details to show exactly
how steam flows from which of the supply headers
through the jacket and back into the return header.
The jacketed reactor then acquires its true identity as
part of the processing unit. This is process language.
Some quite common "nonsense situations" were sub-
mitted from which a lot could be learned about the
logic of process engineering. Can you imagine a pump
at the jacket exit that simply pulls the steam through
from the supply header? Figure 1 shows a workable
solution. It also depicts the difference between a book
approach and a flow sheet approach to the problem.
� Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988


When studying the thermal design of shell and
tube exchangers, we went through an example solved
in another well-known textbook [2] which states that
"atmospheric pressure steam condenses on the shell
side." Nobody objected to this as long as we were
busy figuring the number of tubes and passes. The
surprise came when I again asked for the flow sheet.
Only then did it become clear that book language is
not process language. Even the simplest steam trap
requires a pressure drop to function, which means
that in addition to the equipment shown in Figure 1,
it will be necessary to pull a vacuum on the condensate
collection tank in order to make the steam flow at all.
What is more, this vacuum has to be monitored if a
pressure of 1.00 atm. abs. is to prevail in the shell.
The flow sheet question helped integrate the ex-
changer into the processing environment, and it be-
came evident that atmospheric pressure was a poor
choice for the shell.

The typical textbook evaporator calculation [3] will
state the pressure in the last effect to have a certain
value, such as 100 mm Hg absolute or 26 in Hg vac-
uum. All calculations are based on this number, al-
though no effort is made to explain its source. In addi-
tion, our school is located 3500 feet above sea level
where 26 in Hg is considered perfect vacuum. This is
another excellent situation to be explored with pro-
cess language. I got surprised looks when I asked,
"Would you please supply a flow sheet?" and, "What
would you do if some day you were asked to operate
at 23 in Hg vacuum?" The problem statement in the
book did not require that the student think this far
ahead. Many misconceptions about vacuum equipment
can be dispelled by simple confrontation of sense and
nonsense on the flow sheet. Can you imagine a pump
that sucks out all the vapor produced in the last effect?
The surprised looks disappeared as the answers
slowly took shape. A workable solution is presented
in Figure 2. Again, the figure compares book approach
to flow sheet approach to show the enrichment ob-
tained through process language.

An uncommon situation appeared in the study of
the conversion of fermented beer into 96 volume %
ethanol in two distillation towers. The equilibrium
conditions are such that no reflux is required in the
first column. The overhead vapor containing 24 mol %

The method not only motivates students
to participate creatively, but it also generates
questions on process engineering logic that are a
welcome enrichment of class activity. This paper
will illustrate ... how students can be induced to
ask these questions and to find answers ...

20 In Hg ou

FIGURE 2. Condensate collection from evaporator.
Above: book approach. Below: flow sheet approach.

ethanol is fed directly to the appropriate plate of the
second column. On paper, the two columns looked like
any column depicted in textbooks, with the number of
plates determined by the method of McCabe-Thiele
and the feed plates chosen accordingly. Mass and heat
balances closed with the correct amount of open steam
at the bottoms and the correct amount of cooling
water in the second column condenser. There was but
one little problem: At the start, on deciding the
operating pressure, there was no reason for it to be
much different from atmospheric. A distilling com-
pany was consulted and the information obtained that
the first column runs at 3 psig, which confirmed our
reasoning. Consequently, the design proceeded with
this pressure. When the time came to provide a flow
sheet, there was no variable available for manipula-
tion to control the first column pressure. Textbooks
were consulted but no answer was found. On combin-
ing the flow sheets of the two towers and after a brain-
storming session, the fact slowly emerged that the
first column pressure in this scheme is not an inde-


pendent variable as it is in standard reflux columns
discussed in the books. The second column pressure
has to be controlled at the condensate drum, and the
first column pressure would then find its own equilib-
rium value, much like it does in a double effect
evaporator. Had the problem been terminated at the
textbook stage, this "discovery" would have been lost.

Flow sheet is process language. Process language
is exciting. Process language transforms book exam-
ples into process plant examples. Process language
resorts to the use of utilities to vitalize unit operations
teaching. Process language is a stimulating teaching

1. Kern, D. Q., Process Heat Transfer, McGraw-Hill (1950).
Example 20.1
2. Foust et al., Principles of Unit Operations, 2nd Edition, John
Wiley & Sons (1980). Example 15.1
3. McCabe, W. L., J. C. Smith, P. Harriott, Unit Operations of
Chemical Engineering, 4th Edition, McGraw-Hill (1985).
Example 16.1

Son book reviews

by M. J. Lockett
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and
New York, 1986. 224 + xxiii pp. $54.50
Reviewed by
James R. Fair
The University of Texas at Austin
The distillation column continues to be the princi-
pal separation device for the chemical and petroleum
processing industries. For many years it was charac-
terized as a vertical, cylindrical column containing
plates or trays upon which rising vapor and descend-
ing liquid were brought into intimate contact, for pur-
poses of effective mass transfer. In recent years de-
signers of distillation columns have shifted some at-
tention to the use of structured (as opposed to ran-
dom) packing as vehicles for effecting intimate phase
contacting. However, such packing are considerably
more expensive than trays, and their cost is often jus-
tified only when their lower pressure drop carries an
economic advantage, as in some vacuum distillations.
Thus, the tray column remains as the standard and
basic device for vapor-liquid contacting.
Despite the title, this book deals not only with

trays for distillation services but also covers applica-
tions in absorption and stripping. It covers all of the
important aspects of tray design, those of a more hy-
drodynamic nature as well as those relating directly
to the mass transfer propensity of the two-phase mix-
ture on the tray. Considerable space is devoted to the
characterization of this mixture: foam, emulsion,
froth, spray, and so on. The overall coverage is quite
complete, with no detail of design left unaddressed.
Such important topics as phase flow distribution, ca-
pacity limits, pressure drop and interphase mass
transport are dealt with on quantitative bases. A com-
mendable effort has been made by the author to con-
sider all historical approaches (mostly empirical) that
deal with the various design parameters. The litera-
ture coverage is near exhaustive, and the reader will
not find elsewhere as complete a bibliography on the
distillation tray as is provided here. For each design
consideration, a method with some fundamental and
mechanistic support is provided-and for practition-
ers of distillation system design this is a welcome ad-
vance from the art and empiricism that have often
There are some limitations to the treatment that
should be mentioned. First, the author has not always
found it possible to make a forthright recommendation
when several alternate models or procedures are
available for a particular design step. The reader
must then make his own choice. Also, despite the title,
all tray-type contacting devices are not considered.
There is very little on valve trays, essentially nothing
on bubble-cap trays, and complete silence on dualflow
trays (those without downcomers). Emphasis is
clearly on crossflow sieve trays, but this is not all bad.
While there are still many bubble-cap tray columns in
operation, very few new ones have been designed dur-
ing the last few decades. The valve-tray is really a
proprietary contactor, with design often left up to the
proprietor. The dualflow tray is a rather specialized
device (and tricky to design), used mostly for fouling
services. On the other hand, the sieve tray is an effi-
cient and relatively inexpensive non-proprietary de-
vice that has been the object of many basic studies,
and its simple geometry (in effect, one or more sheets
of perforated metal, joined to a downcomer for hand-
ling liquid passage) makes it reasonably amenable to
fundamental modeling. Still, the title might have read
"Distillation Sieve Tray Fundamentals."
The book might have been improved by the inclu-
sion of some worked-out design examples, some ad-
vice on laboratory or pilot plant scaleup procedures,
and an author index. Still, the development of ra-
tional, fundamental-based approaches to the handling


of complex two-phase mixtures, as are found on trays,
is refreshing and encouraging. The author has an ex-
tensive background in the research, testing and mod-
eling of distillation devices, and his authoritative text
reads very well. There is no equal to the book pre-
sently on the market. Anyone concerned with the de-
sign or analysis of distillation, absorption or stripping
columns of the tray type will want to take advantage
of the modern approaches presented in this book. EO

by Ralph T. Yang
Butterworth Publishers,
80 Montvale Avenue, Stoneham, MA 02180;
352 pages, $52.95 (1986)
Reviewed by
D. M. Ruthven
University of New Brunswick
The importance of adsorption as a separation pro-
cess in the chemical and petroleum industries has in-
creased dramatically in recent years, but the subject
is still not covered in any significant way in most
chemical engineering curricula. There have been three
recent books on the subject: Principles of Adsorption
and Adsorption Processes, by this reviewer, pub-
lished by Wiley in 1984; Large Scale Adsorption and
Chromatography, by P. C. Wankat, published by
CRC Press in 1986; and the present volume by Ralph
Yang, published by Butterworth Publishers in 1987.
None of these is really a textbook in the formal sense,
but any of them could be used as the basis for a
graduate level (or possibly a final year elective) course
on the subject.
The coverage of the present volume is broadly
similar to that of Principles of Adsorption and Ad-
sorption Processes, and there is considerable overlap,
which is probably inevitable since many of the source
references are common. The emphasis is, however,
different-reflecting the different areas of interest
and expertise of the authors. The book provides a
coherent and comprehensive account of the subject,
including the basic physico-chemical principles as well
as process technology. Although the title is Gas Sep-
aration by Adsorption Processes (and this is indeed
the main focus), liquid phase separation processes
such as the "Sorbex Process" and parametric pumping
are also covered briefly. As with its predecessors, the
emphasis is on fundamentals rather than on technolog-
ical details, and the level of background knowledge
which is assumed is also similar.
The book is divided into eight chapters: 1. Intro-

duction; 2. Adsorbents and Adsorption Isotherms; 3.
Equilibrium Adsorption of Gas Mixtures; 4. Rate Pro-
cesses in Adsorbers; 5. Adsorber Dynamics-Bed
Profiles and Breakthrough Curves; 6. Cyclic Gas Sep-
aration Processes; 7. Pressure Swing Adsorption-
Principles and Processes; 8. Pressure Swing Adsorp-
tion-Models and Experiments.
It is not a book for the undergraduate, but it
should be easily understood by graduate students and
those with some experience in research and develop-
ment. Since most adsorption processes operate under
transient conditions, some familiarity with partial dif-
ferential equations is needed to follow the sections
dealing with column dynamics and process modeling
(Chapters 5 and 8). I found Chapter 3, which contains
a good review of the various approaches to the corre-
lation and prediction of multicomponent adsorption
equilibria, and Chapters 7 and 8, which provide an
authoritative summary of PSA technology and model-
ing, to be most useful.
There is no discussion of membrane separation
processes which compete directly with pressure swing
adsorption in a number of applications. While mem-
brane separations may not be included within the nar-
rower definition of adsorption processes, some such
discussion would have been useful to allow the reader
to assess the relative merits of either approach, par-
ticularly in view of the publisher's claim that this is a
"complete treatise covering all aspects of adsorption
processes . . ."
Inevitably in a book which covers such a wide
range of subjects, one can expect controversy over
the treatment of certain topics. For example, in the
discussion of surface diffusion and intracrystalline dif-
fusion in zeolites (pp. 113-121) it should probably have
been pointed out that the kinetic treatment (which is
emphasized) and the quasi-thermodynamic treatment
(which is criticized) are not necessarily in conflict, but
merely represent different ways of looking at the
same phenomenon. The advantage of the quasi-ther-
modynamic treatment is that it allows meaningful
transport co-efficients to be derived without know-
ledge of the detailed diffusion mechanism. This may
not be obvious to the casual reader. Such criticisms
are, however, minor, and any lack of balance is more
than offset by the advantages in the presentation of
coherent perspective.
Taken as a whole, the book presents a concise and
readable summary of the voluminous literature of the
subject. It will no doubt become required reading for
those working in this area, both in universities and in
industry. At US $52.95 it is (just about) within the
affordable price range for individuals. [


mn _ lecture


Kansas State University
Manhattan, KS 66506

STUDENTS OF thermodynamics soon learn to ap-
preciate the utility of entropy in making various
calculations involving process heat and work effects.
These are direct applications found in engineering and
physical science. However, in addition to these quan-
titative applications, one finds qualitative and
metaphoric uses of entropy in a wide diversity of
fields. The extent to which the concept of entropy has
suffused contemporary thought is well illustrated by
Lord C. P. Snow's assertion that any definition of cul-
ture should include a technical component and that an
understanding of the second law of thermodynamics
is the cultural equivalent of a familiarity with the
works of Shakespeare [1].
Igoring incidental uses, a few examples will be pre-
sented here in which the concept of entropy is central
to the development of a theme or is thought to provide
insight. The intent is to illustrate the pervasiveness
of the fascination evoked by the entropy concept-the
entropy mystique.

Of the many formulations of the laws of ther-
modynamics, the boldest and most provocative was
advanced in 1865 by Rudolf Clausius:

* The energy of the universe remains constant.
* The entropy of the universe tends to a maximum.

Here Clausius has taken concepts arising from
limited, earth-bound experience and with a great leap
of imagination has vested them with cosmic signifi-
cance. While both statements are daring, the second-
law statement has sparked the most interest and con-

... a few examples will be presented in which
the concept of entropy is central to the development
of a theme or is thought to provide insight. The intent
is to illustrate the pervasiveness of the fascination
evoked by the entropy concept-
the entropy mystique.

Benjamin G. Kyle is professor of chemical engineering at Kansas
State University and is enjoying his thirtieth year of teaching. He holds
a BS from the Georgia Institute Technology and a PhD from the Univer-
sity of Florida. He has not outgrown an early fascination with ther-
modynamics and is interested in practically all aspects of the subject.
He is the author of a recently published (Prentice-Hall) thermodynamics

troversy because it leads to speculations regarding the
birth and death of the universe.

Birth and Death of the Universe
By definition, the universe must be a closed sys-
tem, and the uncritical extrapolation of our terrestrial
experience would suggest that its entropy is increas-
ing toward a maximum. Because an increase in en-
tropy is associated with a decreased ability to perform
work, the second law implies that the universe will
ultimately reach a dead state referred to as thermal
death. This dead state is an equilibrium state in which
all thermodynamic potentials have been leveled and
processes yielding work are no longer possible.
If one accepts Clausius' statement of the second
law with its implication of thermal death, then by the
following simple argument one can show that the uni-
verse had a beginning. A maximum is characterized
by a first derivative of zero. However, the derivative,
or rate of change, is finite until the maximum is
reached. Thus, if the entropy of the universe is tend-
ing to a maximum, it is doing so at a finite rate and
will reach its goal in a finite time. A universe of infi-
C Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988


nite age would have already reached its equilibrium
state of maximum entropy, and since this is not the
case, the universe must have a finite age. Thus, the
universe had a beginning and we have a position that
is at least congenial to the inference of creation and a
creator. Undoubtedly, the inclination to draw this in-
ference is strengthened by a scientifically more ac-
ceptable theory originated by Lemaitre in 1927 and
more recently popularized [2] as the "Big Bang"
The widely published English prelate, William
Inge, eagerly accepted the proof of a creator as im-
plied by the "law of entropy" [3]. Inge used the pros-
pect of the thermal death of the universe to argue that
God the Creator could not be merely a pantheistic god
found only in nature because such a god would be
under an inexorable death sentence. Such would not
be the fate of the transcendent god of Christianity.

It is not Christianity but modern pantheism and the myth
of unending progress which are undermined by the de-
gradation of energy.

Most notable among those espousing the creation view
was Pope Pius XII, who stated that Clausius' law of
entropy provides "eloquent evidence of the existence
of a Necessary Being." [4]
An argument against the inference of creation
from the laws of thermodynamics was advanced by
the Russian physicist, I. P. Bazarov [5], based on the
dialectic materialism of Engels. Identifying flaws in
the thermal death argument for the existence of a
creator, Bazarov points to the unfounded assumption
that the laws of thermodynamics apply to the entire
universe and to Engels' argument that the creation
implied by the second law would be in violation of the
first law. In Engels' words, those advocating the pro-
creation view saw the universe as winding down and
thus assumed that an initial winding up had been pro-
vided by "a stimulus from without." However, the
process of winding up imparted energy to the universe
and hence the total energy of the universe has not
always been constant as required by Clausius' first-
law statement.
It now appears that Engels' argument of a first-
law violation may be vitiated by recent calculations
that indicate the total of all energy in the universe is
zero [6]. This is possible because energy of motion and
the energy equivalent of mass are positive while
energy of gravitational or electromagnetic attraction
is negative. A zero energy sum would imply that cre-
ation could have occurred without an energy input and
brings to mind the theological doctrine of creation ex

The theory of relativity shows that time and
space are part of the structure of the universe and
not . . an empty stage on which physical events are
enacted. However, within this purely physical
picture there remains the basic question
of the direction of time.

Bazarov's criticism regarding the unwarranted ex-
tension of the laws of thermodynamics to the entire
universe seems well taken. This is especially so con-
sidering that on a cosmic scale the predominant
energy effects are associated with gravitation and
radiation, types of energy which are usually neglected
when applying thermodynamics in its usual terrestrial
context. In spite of this obvious incongruity, the ques-
tion is still unresolved for today one finds astrophysi-
cists concerned with entropy changes of various cos-
mic processes in which quantum and relativistic ef-
fects predominate [6].

Of all the basic quantities in the physical world,
time is the most elusive. This is because we not only
experience it as an abstraction useful in physical sci-
ence, but also in a psychological sense. Because the
latter lies beyond the realm of physics, any strictly
physical description of time can never be entirely
The theory of relativity shows that time and space
are part of the structure of the universe and not, as
pictured by classical physics, an empty stage on which
physical events are enacted. However, within this
purely physical picture there remains the basic ques-
tion of the direction of time. The equations of classical
mechanics, quantum mechanics, and relativity theory
are symmetric in time and do not preclude the rever-
sibility of processes. On the other hand, we know that
all naturally occurring processes are irreversible and
hence travel only in what we have designated as the
forward direction of time. For this reason the second
law of thermodynamics is said to define the "arrow of
time." Time increases in the direction of increasing
The problem of reconciling the reversibility of the
microscopic world of colliding molecules obeying the
laws of classical mechanics with the irreversible be-
havior of the macroscopic world was first undertaken
by Boltzmann. This search for the origins of irreversi-
bility provides an interesting chapter in the annals of
science [7] and has led to the development of statistical
mechanics, an area of science which has proved quite
useful in the calculation of thermodynamic and trans-
port properties. However, despite this practical suc-


cess, the origins of irreversibility have yet to be deter-
mined to the satisfaction of scientists of a philosophical
bent [8].

At present there is disagreement among scientists
as to whether living systems can be completely de-
scribed by the laws that apply to inanimate matter or
whether additional, but as yet undiscovered, laws ap-
plying only to living matter are also needed. However,
the various identifiable physical and chemical proces-
ses occurring within living systems require no addi-
tional laws for their explication and therefore conform
to the laws of thermodynamics. Additionally, it is
known that the laws of thermodynamics are obeyed
by each living system as it interacts with its environ-
ment. Our present societal obsession with diets and
calorie counting serves as a monotonous reminder of
our bondage to the first law, but the dictates of the
second law are not so obvious and, in fact, may seem
counter-intuitive. The conceptual difficulty appears
when we regard life as a striving to maintain order
and the second law as a principle of degradation. This
apparent conflict is due to our failure to recognize liv-
ing systems as open systems. In an open system the
combined entropy of the system and surroundings
must increase. Thus, a living system can maintain it-
self or grow, and thereby decrease its entropy, if the
surroundings undergo the appropriate increase in en-
tropy. This leads directly to the statement that life is
sustained by the conversion of low-entropy resources
into high-entropy wastes. The ultimate origin of low-
entropy resources is the sun which drives the photo-
synthetic mechanism in plants whereby solar energy
is converted into chemical energy and stored as carbo-
Despite reconciliation of the life force with the law
of entropy, there is still a persistent undercurrent of
nagging doubt when the origin and evolution of life
are considered. These activities imply purpose, a goal
that seems totally opposed by the entropy principle.
This contradiction was recogized by Teilhard de Char-
din in formulating his grand scheme of evolution to-
wards an Omega Point of pure consciousness and
ecstatic union with God [9]. Because of the law of
entropy with its opposing tendencies and prospect of
thermal death, Teilhard postulated two classes of
energy: tangential and radial. Tangential energy is
simply the energy identified by physical science and
subject to the laws of thermodynamics. On the other
hand, radial energy is of a psychic or spiritual nature
and is not subject to the laws of thermodynamics. The
evolution of life toward the Omega Point is said to be

driven by radial energy and thus is free of second-law
restrictions. The relationship of the two classes of
energy is tenuous and is best illustrated by Teilhard's

To think, we must eat. But what a variety of thoughts we
get out of one slice of bread! Like the letters of the alphabet,
which can equally well be assembled into nonsense as into
the most beautiful poem, the same calories seem as indif-
ferent as they are necessary to the spiritual values they

Teilhard was a Jesuit priest as well as a scientist,
but he wanted his work to be judged on the basis of
its scientific merit. His Phenomenon of Man is a
monumental attempt to meld science and metaphysics
to provide an answer to the question of meaning. De-
spite his heroic effort to fuse faith and reason, science,
because it recognizes only reason, could do nothing
but render a negative verdict. Nevertheless, his work
has wide appeal today, some thirty years after his
death. Perhaps this is because the soul of a poet and
mystic shows through. After all, who but a poet or
mystic would dare address such questions.

Henry Adams, the noted American historian and
man of letters, was the first to view the course of
civilization (i.e., history) from a second-law perspec-
tive [10]. In the opening years of the twentieth cen-
tury he expounded a theory of history in which the
Social Energy of civilization is continually dissipated.
According to Adams, the second law of ther-
modynamics required that, ". . . the higher powers of
energy tended always to fall lower, and that this pro-
cess had no known limit." In the category of energy
Adams included the Vital Energy of an individual and
the Social Energy of society and stated that, "The law
of entropy imposes a servitude on all energies, includ-
ing the mental." All this naturally resulted in a pes-
simistic prognosis for civilization where ". .. the ash-
heap was constantly increasing in size."
According to one of its most famous practitioners,
Claude Levi-Strauss, the field of anthropology could
appropriately be called "entropology." Levi-Strauss
[11] sees man and his civilizations as "instruments in-
tended to create inertia, at a rate and in a proportion
infinitely higher than the amount of organization they
involve." He further states

Thus it is that civilization taken as a whole, can be de-
scribed as an extraordinary complex mechanism, which we
might be tempted to see as offering an opportunity of sur-
vival for the human world, ifits function were not to produce


what physicists call entropy, that is inertia. Every verbal ex-
change, every line printed, establishes communication be-
tween people, thus creating an evenness of level, where be-
fore there was an information gap and consequently a
greater degree of organization.

We find familiar the concept that the net result of
human life is an increase in entropy, but the idea of a
leveling of social organization through communication
is a bit unexpected and would appear to be a
metaphoric extension of the thermal death concept.
The second law of thermodynamics has been shown
to provide a realistic perspective for economics [12].
According to Nicholas Georgescu-Roegen, the conven-
tional view of economic process as circular and time-
less ignores the increase in entropy accompanying
every human endeavor. Georgescu-Roegen sees
economic activity as turning low-entropy inputs into
high-entropy outputs.

All species depend on the sun as their ultimate source of
low entropy except man, who has learned also to exploit the
terrestrial stores of low entropy such as minerals and fossil
fuels. Life feeds on low entropy and so does economic life.
Objects of economic value such as fruit, cloth, china, lum-
ber, and copper, are highly ordered, low-entropy structures.
For low entropy is the taproot of economic scarcity.

He observes that economic development as presently
practiced is based on rapacious consumption of our
terrestrial dowry of low-entropy materials and con-
cludes that this can not be indefinitely sustained.
Using the entropy-conscious economic views of
Georgescu-Roegen, Herman Daly [13] argues persua-
sively against the fallacy of perpetual growth and even
suggests that growth itself may be illusory when mea-
sured by the GNP. This closely watched economic in-
dicator includes, besides the value of goods produced
and services rendered, all costs associated with pro-
duction, including pollution control costs. As the
richer and more accessible resources are preferen-
tially consumed, the remaining lower-quality re-
sources require higher production costs and thus a
rise in GNP may reflect increased cost of production
rather than increased level of production. This is the
entropic factor largely ignored by conventional
economics. As an alternative to growth, Daly has out-
lined in some detail the workings of a steady-state
The work of Georgescu-Roegen has also inspired
Jeremy Rifkin's Entropy: A New World View [14] in
which the entropy law is credited with singlehandedly
undermining the Newtonian-Cartesian mechanistic
world view. Rifkin believes that a new world view
based on the entropy law would expose the fallacy in

our present obsession with growth and would allow us
to meet the future with awareness and acceptance of
nature's constraints. This change in outlook would af-
fect practically every area of human endeavor ranging
from technology to religion and could move us toward
the long-sought but ever-distant utopian dream.
There is no doubt that Rifkin has overstated his case
in a single-minded and over-simplified manner, but
exaggeration is a forensic device which often becomes
acceptable when used in passion for a worthy cause.
Because the inculcation of an entropy-conscious world
view is considered by many to be such a cause,
perhaps Rifkin should not be judged too harshly for
his excesses.

Metaphoric entropic themes abound in modern fic-
tion [15] as well as in serious science fiction [16]. Most
applications are implicit, although several writers
explicitly use the term entropy in their work. These
writers are predominately American and include John
Barth, Donald Barthelme, Saul Bellow, Stanley Elkin,
Norman Mailer, Walker Percy, Thomas Pynchon, and
John Updike. As expected of fertile imaginations, one
finds many variations of the entropic theme whether
used explicitly or implicitly. The theme has been
applied to either individuals or entire societies, some-
times within the context of a closed system, with ulti-
mate states as extreme as chaos and stagnation.
Norbert Wiener's famous book on cybernetics [17]
first appeared in 1950 and was undoutedly instrumen-
tal in popularizing the application of the entropy con-
cept to the many aspects of the human condition as
found in modern literature. Moreover, Wiener's iden-
tification of entropy as a measure of the information
content of messages stimulated writers to examine the
very act of writing [18]. In Wiener's words

Messages are themselves a form of pattern and organiza-
tion. Indeed, it is possible to treat sets of messages as having
an entropy like sets of states of the external world. Just as
entropy is a measure of disorganization, the information
carried by a set of messages is a measure of organization. In
fact, it is possible to interpret the information carried by a
message as essentially the negative of its entropy, and the
negative logarithm of its probability. That is, the more prob-
able the message, the less information it gives. Cliches, for
example, are less illuminating than great poems.

The idea behind this passage is easily grasped
when applied to the transmission of factual data (e.g.,
a seven-digit telephone number) or a coded message
(e.g., one if by land, two if by sea) but quickly becomes
fuzzy when considering the transmission of subtle or


One is left wondering why the entropy concept, which offers so little insight, has been so widely employed
outside its narrow scientific context and why any serious artist or writer would even consider the application
of scientific principles to the very act of creating. There does indeed appear to be an entropy mystique . . .

abstract ideas or the more vital aspects of communica-
tion inherent in the sender and receiver. This becomes
apparent when the idea is pushed to its limit. The
writer, in an attempt to counter the entropic effect of
banality, looks for unexpected or improbable ways of
using words and thus runs the risk of verbal chaos.
The dilemma is articulated by Lewicki [12]:

In order to avoid entropy, a writer must therefore walk a
narrow path between the danger of producing probable mes-
sages of low informational value (such as, for example, new
versions of old themes, written in a conventional manner),
and the risk of turning out incomprehensible bodies of words
that would seem disorderly to the reader.

Rudolph Arnheim [19] has recognized the con-
tradictions in information theory as applied to art:

Here order is described as the carrier of information, be-
cause information is defined as the opposite of entropy, and
entropy is a measure of disorder. To transmit information
means to induce order. This sounds reasonable enough.
Next, since entropy grows with the probability of a state of
affairs, information does the opposite: it increases with its
improbability. The less likely an event is to happen, the more
information does its occurrence represent. This again seems
reasonable. Now what sort of sequence of events will be least
predictable and therefore carry a maximum of information.
Obviously a totally disordered one, since when we are con-
fronted with chaos we can never predict what will happen
next. The conclusion is that total disorder provides a maxi-
mum of information; and since information is measured by
order, a maximum of order is conveyed by a maximum of dis-

Arnheim attributes the contradiction to a failure
to distinguish order from structure:

Any predictable regularity is termed redundant by the in-
formation theorist because he is committed to economy:
every statement must be limited to what is needed. He shares
this commitment with scientists and artists; its meaning,
however, depends on whether one chops up patterns into
elementary bits or whether one treats them as structures. A
straight line reduced to a sequence of dots for the purpose of
piecemeal analysis or transmission can be highly redundant;
in the drawing ofa geometrician, engineer, or artist it is not.

In explaining the creative process underlying a
work of art, Arnheim sees an interplay between the
anabolic tendency which establishes the structural
theme and the entropic principle which is manifested
both as a catabolic destruction of patterns, or disor-

during, and a simplification or ordering due to tension
reduction. Here we see the entropy principle invoked
metaphorically and identified simultaneously with two
opposing tendencies: ordering and disordering.

Of all the properties of matter, entropy is most
difficult to conceptualize and seems the most con-
trived. It cannot be evaluated directly from an experi-
mental measurement, but must be calculated from a
somewhat arbitrary computational path and thus its
existence and evaluation are closely tied to human ac-
tivity. It is tainted with a human scent. Perhaps this
is a reason this most anthropomorphic of all the con-
cepts of science has fascinated the human mind.
Despite its mystique, entropy actually provides
very little insight into the mysteries of nature. This
can be appreciated by recalling the familiar textbook
derivations. A Carnot cycle is used to define entropy
and demonstrate that it is a state property. Next, an
isolated system undergoing a spontaneous process is
considered and a simple argument shows that an in-
crease in entropy results. Ramifications of this result
are extremely useful for the detailed calculations
made by engineers and scientists, but in what way
has it improved our general understanding of nature?
Are not the following statements equivalent and
equally enlightening?

A. Every spontaneous process tends toward a condition of
deterioration or stagnation.
B. Entropy is the measure of deterioration or stagnation.
Every spontaneous process results in an increase in en-

Statement A is a direct statement of experience.
Statement B is expressed in the language of an empir-
ically based science and is therefore merely an indirect
but more formalized statement of experience.
The idea of things running down, which can now
be proclaimed as a decree of science, has been found
to be a dominant theme in ancient myths [20]. This
condition also has been lamented by Hesiod, the Greek
poet of the 8th century B.C., who told of the five
descending ages of Man beginning with a pristine age
of gold and ending in his own worldly age of iron.
Also, somewhat later, we find St. Paul [21] referring
to a coming time of glory when "creation itself will be
set free from its bondage to decay." These may be


regarded as generalizations of statement A and ap-
pear more naive than the B-based concept of thermal
death. Yet, even though we favor statement B today,
let us not be deceived into thinking it more insightful
than statement A.
With regard to fixing the direction of time, it is
also instructive to consider two alternative state-
A. In the usual sense of before and after, spontaneous pro-
cesses proceed in the forward direction of time.
B. All spontaneous processes are accompanied by an in-
crease in entropy. The forward direction of time is the
direction in which the entropy increases.
While the practical person would give no advan-
tage to statement B, many philosophers prefer some-
thing similar to it because it appears to have elimi-
nated some of the subjective element that clings to
statement A. Their object is to define time without
reference to the human mind [22]. However, in this
respect an obvious problem arises in the actual deter-
mination of entropy. This requires a human mind to
devise a reversible path between the initial and final
states which is essential to the calculation of the en-
tropy change. There is no entropy meter and the in-
voking of entropy, which is itself a construct of the
human mind, does little to remove the human scent
from the concept of time.
To place the question of time in perspective we
should recognize that it is a construct of the conscious
mind. The subconscious mind, the Freudian id, has no
awareness of time-a fact known to science and easily
verified personally by recalling the particulars of our
dreams. What we have done is to construct from the
regular rhythms of the universe (e.g., the motion of
the earth about its axis or about the sun) a lifeless,
linear time scale upon which we can place in monotonic
order the events of our physical world. This seems so
natural that it comes as something of a shock to learn
that it is possible to have a valid and effective world
view that does not include the concept of time. An
outstanding example of this is the language of the
Hopi indians of the American southwest which con-
tains no reference to "time" either explicitly or im-
plicitly. This language is capable of accounting for and
describing correctly, in a pragmatic or operational
sense, all observable phenomena in the universe with-
out the mental construct of time [23].
The avowed aim of science is to establish the basis
of physical reality. However, two different interpreta-
tions exist: external and internal. The external ver-
sion is the older, traditional view in which the human
mind objectively probes and observes nature and
thereby discovers natural laws. Recent developments

in physics, however, have cast doubt on the concept
of an objective observer independent of the system
observed [24], and this has led to the view that science
merely creates a set of interlocking laws which pro-
vides a consistent description of nature. This descrip-
tion usually involves the use of abstractions and men-
tal constructs far removed from our everyday experi-
ence and may thus be termed a view of physical reality
internal to the mind [25]. The previous discussion of
time and entropy is obviously an argument for the
internal view.
One is now left wondering why the entropy con-
cept, which offers so little insight, has been so widely
employed outside its narrow scientific context and
why any serious artist or writer would even consider
the application of scientific principles to the very act
of creating. There does indeed appear to be an entropy
mystique, although the reasons for it will not be
explored. Perhaps the following verse is appropriate.

For thermodynamics we feel a sense of awe
And marvel at the power of those early minds
Who showed that mundane matters lead to
natural law
And boldly stated that the universe unwinds.
The second law is never denied its due
In science, belles-lettres, and philosophy.
It pales the onward-and-upward view,
For no one is consoled by entropy.
While nothing temporal eludes its iron rule
And most would take decay's decree as true,
The sage's bane can be the builder's tool
As entropy shows the best that we can do.
This useful concept prompts a primal groan:
A dread we've only named but always known.

1. Snow, C. P., The Two Cultures: And a Second Look, The
New American Library, New York, 1964.
2. See, for example, Weinberg, S., The First Three Minutes,
Fontana, 1978.
3. Inge, W. R., God and the Astronomers, Longmans, Green &
Co., London, 1934.
4. Address to the Pontificial Academy of Sciences, Rome 1951,
reprinted in English in Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 8,
143 (1952).
5. Bazarov, I. P., Thermodynamics, pg 74, Macmillan, New
York, 1964.
6. Davies, Paul, God and the New Physics, Ch. 3, Simon and
Schuster, Inc., New York, 1983.
7. Brush, S., The Kind of Motion We Call Heat, North Holland
Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1976.
8. For a review of this problem, see Hollinger, H. B. and M. J.
Continued on page 102.





Georgia Institute of Technology
Atlanta, GA 30332-0100

R ECENT YEARS HAVE witnessed a rapid and dra-
matic change in the nature of the chemical pro-
cess industries in the developed countries of the
world. Specifically, there has been an intense revival
of commercial interest in batch chemical processes,
such as those employed in the manufacture of fine and
specialty chemicals, at the expense of traditional con-
tinuous steady-state processes for the manufacture of
commodity chemicals. One large British chemical com-
pany reports that specialty chemicals manufactured
by batch processing contributed over 30% to their
total profits in 1983 as opposed to 18% in 1977 [1].
Certainly, one of the primary driving forces for this
change has been the recent commissioning of many
world-scale commodity chemicals plants in various de-
veloping countries.

Concomitant with these industry changes, signifi-
cant developments have occurred in the modeling and
simulation of chemical processes. To be sure, usage
(including academic) and development of conventional
steady-state process simulators continue at an active
level. Thus, the FLOWTRAN system [2] developed
by the Monsanto Company was made available to
chemical engineering schools in 1973 and has been ex-
tensively employed for educational purposes ever
since [3]. Subsequently, newer steady-state process
simulation systems such as PROCESS, ASPEN
PLUS and DESIGN II became available to academic

Discrete-event simulators were originally
developed as numerical aids to solve complex
queuing theory problems which were not amenable
to analytical solution. Such problems occur
routinely in the field of industrial engineering . . .

� Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988

Daniel J. Schultheisz received his bachelor's degree in chemical
engineering from the University of Pennsylvania and is currently com-
pleting the requirements for his master's degree in chemical engineer-
ing at Georgia Tech. For his thesis, he is preparing an instructor's
manual of exercises in chemical engineering using GPSS, to be distri-
buted and marketed by the CACHE Corporation. (L)
Jude T. Sommerfeld is professor and associate director of the School
of Chemical Engineering at Georgia Tech. He received his BChE degree
from the University of Detroit and his MSE and PhD degrees, also in
chemical engineering, from the University of Michigan. His 25 years
of industrial and academic experience have been primarily in the area
of computer-aided design, and he has published over seventy articles
in this and other areas. (R)

We have also witnessed the development and ap-
plication of various simulators for batch chemical pro-
cesses in recent years. These developments have in-
cluded both discrete-event and combined (discrete +
continuous) systems, as employed in the industrial en-
gineering field. There is an unfortunate confusion in
terminology here: the industrial engineering interpre-
tation of the term 'continuous' is not the same as that
associated with chemical engineering usage, namely,
steady-state operation. Rather, the industrial en-
gineering meaning of continuous should be construed
by chemical engineers as dynamic or unsteady-state.
The progenitor of discrete-event simulation sys-
tems is GPSS [4], which dates back to 1959 and is still
used extensively in many manufacturing sectors. Be-
cause of its easy use, availability, reliability, and effi-
cient operation (integer arithmetic only in many ver-
sions), GPSS is a very effective tool if only discrete
simulation capability is required. Other popular dis-


Recent Applications of GPSS to Chemical
and Allied Processes

Two batch reactors in parallel followed by a batch
DDT manufacture
Chocolate manufacturing
Sequence of batch distillation columns
Large-scale poliomyelitis vaccine production
Choline chloride manufacture
Polyvinyl chloride (PVC) manufacture
Sequencing batch reactors (SBR) for wastewater

crete-event simulation systems include S
(more prevalent in Europe) and SIMSCG
general, however, there are not many pub
cations of discrete-event simulation system
chemical processes. Morris [7], for exam
scribed a very simple application of GPS
process comprised of two reactors in para
by a still. Other recent applications of GP
ical and allied batch (or semi-continuous) p
listed in Table 1.

Discrete-event simulators were or
veloped as numerical aids to solve comp
theory problems which were not amenable

Terminology in Usage of the FLOWTR
GPSS Simulators

Precoded functional
Arguments of functional
Items moving through
the model
Numerical characteristics
of moving items

Output quantities from
subroutines (other
than moving items)




Properties ( e.g.,
Retention vector





RIPT [6]. In
ilished appli-
ems to batch
iple, has de-
S to a batch
llel followed
'SS to chem-
irocesses are

Despite their considerable differences in origin
and application, there are noteworthy similarities
among the various types of simulators ... For example,
FLOWTRAN and GPSS have a number of
preceded functional subroutines.

cal solution. Such problems occur routinely in the field
of industrial engineering and typical example applica-
tions include machine shops, customer service sta-
tions, and transportation networks.
Most discrete simulation systems have stochastic
capabilities for the scheduling of time events. To sup-
port this function, most such systems also have one or
more built-in random-number generators. Output
from the latter is used to sample event times (or dura-
tions between time events) from various probability
distributions. In GPSS, the only easy-to-use, built-in
distribution is the uniform or rectangular distribution.
Thus, for example, a service time can take the form,
A � B, where A represents the mean value and B is
the half-width, in appropriate time units, of the distri-


Despite their considerable differences in origin and
application, there are noteworthy similarities among
the various types of simulators described above. For
example, FLOWTRAN and GPSS have a number of
iginally de- preceded functional subroutines (generally written in
flex queuing FORTRAN). In both FLOWTRAN and GPSS, these
le to analyti- functional subroutines are known as blocks.
There is a number of other similarities between
these two systems, obscured only by the technical jar-
gon employed. In conventional steady-state chemical
AN and process simulators such as FLOWTRAN and PRO-
CESS, the items which move from one block to
another in the model are known as streams. Each in-
GPSS dividual stream has a set of properties (composition,
Discrete-Event temperature, pressure) associated with it, which are
Simulator) typically modified as the stream passes through a
Blocks block. In analogous fashion, the items which proceed
from block to block in a GPSS model are known as
Operands transactions. Also in analogy with stream properties
in a steady-state process simulator, GPSS transac-
Transactions tions have associated with them various parameters
(such as priority level or lifetime in the model) which
Parameters can be modified by the passage of the transaction
through certain blocks. In a GPSS model of a batch
Standard chemical plant, for example, transactions could repre-
numerical sent batches of material proceeding through the pro-
attributes cess. Table 2 summarizes these similarities and ter-
minology for the FLOWTRAN and GPSS simulators.


There are about thirty-five different blocks in
GPSS, roughly the same number as in the FLOW-
TRAN system. A listing of these GPSS blocks is given
in Table 3. It is common to construct block diagrams
in the development of GPSS models. In contrast with
FLOWTRAN where each block in such diagrams is
represented more or less by a rectangle, each differ-
ent functional block in a GPSS block diagram has its
own distinctive shape (see Schriber [4]).
Some of the GPSS blocks listed in Table 3 are quite
complicated and would typically be used only by more
sophisticated analysts. There are others, however,
which would be common to any GPSS model. Thus,
GENERATE blocks are used to provide transactions
to a model, much like a chemical engineer inputs feed
streams to a FLOWTRAN model. Conversely, a
transaction is removed from a GPSS model by a TER-
MINATE block.
There is a block named SPLIT in both FLOW-
TRAN and GPSS, but there is one fundamental differ-
ence between the two. In the FLOWTRAN system,
the sum of each extensive property over all of the
output streams from the block equals that property
for the incoming stream. In discrete-event simulation
with GPSS, however, the SPLIT block really per-
forms a cloning operation. That is, one or more identi-
cal offspring transactions are created from the single
parent transaction (which retains its existence) enter-
ing the block.


As with the FLOWTRAN system which provides
a summary table of the streams passing through the
model and output results from each of the blocks in
the model, GPSS automatically prints out a variety of
output statistics at the conclusion of a simulation.
These statistics pertain primarily to the various

Listing of GPSS Blocks




facilities, queues, and storage in the model.
Thus, from an inspection of the facility output
statistics from a GPSS simulation, an analyst might
find that the average holding time per transaction for
a given facility is considerably greater than the user-
supplied average service time for that facility. In a
chemical engineering application, for example, this
could indicate that a reactor, after finishing processing
of a batch (transaction), often cannot discharge the
batch because of an unavailable downstream facility.
The latter might correspond to a storage tank which
is full or another processing unit (e.g., still, centrifuge,
dryer) which is engaged. The regular occurrence of
such a situation would normally be accompanied by an
average utilization (fraction of total time busy) ap-
proaching unity for the original upstream facility and
would suggest the existence of some downstream
bottleneck. The existence of similar bottleneck situa-
tions can also be deduced from the output statistics
for GPSS storage. The productivity (number of
batches produced) of the modelled process is, of
course, related to the number of transactions passing
through the GPSS model.


Let us consider a very simple application of GPSS
to the modeling of a batch chemical process. This
example is an adaptation of a problem (number
2.41.14) presented by Schriber [4]; the process flow
diagram for this example is presented in Figure 1.

ORDERS ------ - O - - PRODUCT
FIGURE 1. Sketch of batch process for example problem.

Thus, a small, single-product batch chemical plant
has three identical reactors in parallel, followed by a
single storage tank and a batch still. Customer orders
(batches) to be filled (which begin with processing in
the reactor) occur every 115 � 30 minutes, uniformly
distributed. The reaction time in a given reactor is
335 � 60 minutes, and the distillation time in the still
is 110 � 25 minutes, both times uniformly distributed.
The holding capacity of the storage tank is exactly one
batch. Hence, the storage tank must be empty for a
given reactor to discharge its batch; if not, the reactor
cannot begin processing a new batch until the storage



FIGURE 2. GPSS block diagram for example problem.

tank becomes empty. The simulation is to be run for
100 batches. The model should have the capability to
collect waiting line statistics for the queue im-
mediately upstream of the reactor.
The GPSS block diagram for this example model
is shown in Figure 2. Note the distinctive shapes for
each of the blocks employed. The first executable
block is the GENERATE block, which creates trans-
actions representing customer orders (batches). These
transactions immediately queue up and attempt to
capture an available reactor via the ENTER block.
After capturing a reactor, a batch leaves the reactor
queue through the DEPART REACQ block, and is
processed in the ADVANCE 335,60 block. The batch
must first be able to enter the storage tank (ENTER
TANK block) before it releases its reactor in the
LEAVE REACT block. The batch then attempts to
capture the single still facility in the SEIZE STILL
block. Having accomplished such, the batch leaves the
storage tank, is processed in the still, releases the
latter, and finally leaves the model through the TER-
MINATE block. Selected output statistics from this
simulation are summarized in Table 4.
From Table 4, one sees that the batch still was in
use 91.1% of the time, and the average holding (pro-
cessing) time per batch was 108 minutes. The average
contents in the queue upstream of the reactors was
0.44 batch, and the average waiting time for all
batches, including ones which experienced no waiting,
in this queue was 50.5 minutes. The three reactors
were in use 95.2% of the time, and the average holding

time for a batch in a reactor was 329 minutes. Simi-
larly the storage tank (with a capacity of one batch)
was full 41.4% of the time, and the average holding
time therein was 48.6 minutes. Although not pre-
sented in Table 4, the total simulation time, to com-
pletely process 100 batches, was 11,967 minutes.
One can easily explore proposed modifications to
this process. Thus, one more reactor could be added
in an effort to increase productivity. One might find
as a result, however, a significant increase in the aver-
age reactor holding time beyond the nominal average
reaction time of 335 minutes. In this case, one could
explore increasing the intermediate storage capacity
(TANK) and/or improving the downstream distillation

This article has attempted to serve as a brief intro-
ductory tutorial on discrete-event simulation, with
emphasis on chemical engineering applications. For
some simple batch process applications, only discrete
simulation capability is required. More complex appli-
cations would require usage of a combined (discrete
plus dynamic) simulation system, but knowledge of
the essential features of discrete-event simulation re-
mains useful background in such cases.

1. Preston, M. L., and G. W. H. Frank, "A New Tool for Batch
Process Engineers--ICI's BatchMASTER," Plant/Opera-
tions Progr., 4, 217 (1985).
2. Seader, J. D., W. D. Seider, and A. C. Pauls, FLOWTRAN

Selected GPSS Output from Example Simulation
of a Batch Chemical Process

Facility Statistics
(batch still, STILL):
Average utilization
Average holding time per batch, min
Queue Statistics
(reactor queue, REACQ):
Maximum contents
Average contents
Average waiting time (all batches), min
Storage Statistics:
Reactors (REACT):
Average utilization
Average holding time per batch, min
Storage Tank (TANK):
Average utilization
Average holding time per batch, min






Simulation-An Introduction, 2nd Ed., Ulrich's Bookstore,
Ann Arbor, MI, 1977.
3. Clark, J. P., and J. T. Sommerfeld, "Use of FLOWTRAN
Simulation in Education," Chem. Eng. Ed., 10, No. 2, 90
4. Schriber, T. J., Simulation Using GPSS, Wiley, New York,
5. Franta, W. R., The Process View of Simulation, Elsevier
North-Holland, New York, 1977.
6. Wyman, F. P., Simulation Modeling: A Guide to Using
SIMSCRIPT, Wiley, New York, 1970.
7. Morris, R. C., "Simulating Batch Processes," Chem. Eng.,
90, No. 10, 77 (1983).
8. Blaylock, C. R., C. O. Morgan, and J. T. Sommerfeld, "GPSS
Simulation of DDT Manufacture," Proc. 14th IASTED Intl.
Conf. on Appl. Sim. and Mod., Vancouver, June, 1986, p.
9. Passariello, I., and J. T. Sommerfeld, "GPSS Simulation of
Chocolate Manufacturing" in Tools for the Simulation Profes-
sion, Soc. for Computer Simulation, San Diego, 1987, p. 1.
10. Barnette, D. T., andJ. T. Sommerfeld, "Discrete-Event Simu-
lation of a Sequence of Multi-Component Batch Distillation
Columns," Comp. & Chem. Eng., 11, 395 (1987).
11. Kenvin, J. C., and J. T. Sommerfeld, "Discrete-Event Simula-
tion of Large-Scale Poliomyelitis Vaccine Production," Process
Biochem., 22, 74 (1987).
12. Bales, W. J., J. R. Johnson, and J. T. Sommerfeld, "Use of a
Queuing Simulator in Design of a Batch Chemical Production
System," Prodn. and Inventory Mgmt., accepted for publica-
tion (1987).
13. Adebekun, A. K., Z. Q. Song, and J. T. Sommerfeld, "GPSS
Simulation of PVC Manufacture," Polymer Process Eng., 5,
145 (1987).
14. Glenn, S. L., R. T. Norris, Jr., and J. T. Sommerfeld, "Dis-
crete-Event Simulation of Sequencing Batch Reactors (SBR)
for Wastewater Treatment," J. Water Poll. Cont. Fedn., sub-
mitted for publication (1987). El

Continued from page 97.
Zenzen, The Nature of Irreversibility, D. Reidel Pub. Co.,
Dordrecht, Holland, 1985.
9. Teilhard de Chardin, P., The Phenomenon of Man, Harper
and Row, New York, 1975. A good summary of Teilhard's
arguments is presented in Barrow, J. D. and F. J. Tipler, The
Anthropic Cosmological Principle, Ch. 3, Clarendon Press,
Oxford, 1986.
10. Adams, Henry, The Degradation of Democratic Dogma, Re-
print of the 1919 ed., Harper Torchbooks, New York, 1969.
11. Levi-Strauss, C., Tristes Tropiques, translated by J. and D.
Weightman, Jonathan Cape, London, 1973.
12. Georgescu-Roegen, N., The Entropy Law and the Economic
Process, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1971.
13. Daly, Herman E., Steady-State Economics, W. H. Freeman
& Co., San Francisco, 1977.
14. Rifldn, J., Entropy: A New World View, Bantam Books, New
York, 1980.
15. Tanner, Tony, City of Words, Chap. 6, Harper and Row, New
York, 1971, and Lewicki, Zbigniew, The Bang and the
Whimper, Greenwood Press, Westport, CT., 1984.
16. Greenland, Colin, The Entropy Exhibition, Routledge and
Kegan Paul, London, 1983.

17. Wiener, Norbert, Human Use of Human Beings, Houghton-
Mifflin, Boston, 1950.
18. Whether entropy can be linked to the information in a message
is still an undecided question. The views of Brillouin and the
Denbighs typify the pro and con, respectively. Brillouin, L.,
Scientific Uncertainty and Information, Academic Press,
New York, 1964. Denbigh, K. G. and J. S. Denbigh, Entropy
in Relation to Incomplete Knowledge, Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge, 1985.
19. Arnheim, Rudolf, Entropy and Art, University of California
Press, Berkeley, 1971.
20. de Santillana, G., and H. von Dechend, Hamlet's Mill, Gambit
Inc., Boston, 1969.
21. Romans 8:21.
22. For lucid and concise discussion of the philosophical problem
of time, see Denbigh, K. G., Three Concepts of Time,
Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.
23. Whorf, B. L., Language, Thought and Reality, M.I.T. Press,
Cambridge, 1956.
24. See, for example, Capra, F., The Tao of Physics, Bantam
Books, New York, 1975.
25. Both the external and internal views are discussed by Morris
Kline in Mathematics and the Search for Knowledge, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, 1985. The internal view is examined
by Roger S. Jones in Physics as Metaphor, New American
Library, New York, 1982. O

Continued from page 61.

pitchers helps my students know each other better,"
Jay notes. "It also helps me maintain a friendly and
open relationship with my group that's important in
our work together."
Research by Bailey and his students was recog-
nized by the Curtis W. McGraw Research Award of
the American Society of Engineering Education in
1983, by Jay's election to the National Academy of
Engineering in 1986, and by the AIChE Professional
Progress Award in 1987.
Bailey does have interests outside of the lab.
Everyone who knows him remarks on his devotion to
Sean, his 18-year-old son, who's now a freshman at
the University of Colorado, Boulder. Jay's an avid
amateur musician-the guitar is his instrument-and
he loves active sports such as tennis, racquetball, and
bicycling. He and Arnold also love to travel. Says
Bailey, "We went to Malaysia and Indonesia last sum-
mer and just wandered around for four weeks for ab-
solutely no professional reason whatsoever. It was
Frances Arnold sums up Jay Bailey's influence on
his profession in the following way, "Jay stands out in
the field as a pioneer in new techniques in the 8,000-
year-old discipline of biochemical engineering. You
won't find many new products coming out of his lab,
but you will find many new ideas." [


book reviews

by A. B. Stiles
Published by Butterworths,
80 Montvale Ave., Stoneham, MA 02180;
270 pages, $54.95 (1987)
Reviewed by
John B. Butt
Northwestern University
The title of this book is interesting enough since
most of those who deal in catalysts, particularly of
supported metals, often have an uneasy feeling that
the "support" dispersivee phase, contact phase, car-
rier, holder-i.e., any number of names) has never
been given enough attention. This book is a good start
in trying to rectify this situation, and Dr. Stiles has
collected a good group of reviews concerned with this.
I particularly enjoyed the first five chapters, devoted
to alumina, oxide supports other than alumina, acti-
vated carbon, and the associated information on their
preparation and properties. The surface chemistry in-
volved in catalyst-support interaction is probably not
as extensively dealt with here as in other sources, but
the overall treatment considered together with prepa-
ration techniques is quite a satisfying and useful one.
Chapter 7, on organic polymers, also falls into this
The remainder of the book sort of strays from the
announced title. Khoobiar has done a good job in
Chapter 9 of "Spillover," and while significant oppos-
ing points are ignored, this is still a good review. Less
satisfying are chapters on the "Commercial Applica-
tion of Molecular Sieve Catalysts" and "Multifunction-
ing Catalysts." This is all old stuff, it seems rather
qualitative, and it strays far from tne announced title
of the volume.
The book is not very well proofread, as illustrated
on page fourteen as well as many other places in the
text. This makes me wonder how good the numbers

in the many tables and illustrations are. The publisher
should be more careful.
In spite of these reservations, I would say that
this is a book worth having. Get it, and learn about
supports. O
Vol I: Two-Phase Systems (679 pages)
Vol II: Three-Phase Systems (399 pages)
Edited by E. Alper; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers,
The Hague, Netherlands, 1983. $140
Reviewed by
Arvind Varma
University of Notre Dame
This two-volume book constitutes the proceedings
of a NATO Advanced Study Institute held in Turkey
in 1981. It includes thirty papers, primarily of a re-
view type, by twelve invited lecturers, and nine other
contributions. Various topics in the area of mass
transfer with chemical reaction in gas-liquid, liquid-
liquid, and gas-liquid-solid systems are covered. These
topics arise in the context of either separation pro-
cesses or reaction engineering. Some of the papers
treat the general problem of multiphase contacting
and reactor design. Others deal with the modeling of
specific types of contractors or reactors, and include
methods for obtaining or estimating physicochemical
and other data. Finally, some papers deal with a spe-
cific application, e.g., facilitated transport, bioreac-
tors, or reactors for coal conversion technology.
The invited lecturers are experts in the area
(mostly from Europe) who have written other reviews
as well. The material is somewhat dated by now, and
other more recent reviews and books have appeared
in print. Nevertheless, these volumes constitute a rich
source of information for this relatively narrow but
important area, and they should prove quite useful to
those involved with multiphase chemically reacting
The volumes were printed from camera-ready
copy. For this type of production, the cost of the book
is high. O



Each year Chemical Engineering Education publishes a special fall issue devoted to grad-
uate education. This issue consists of 1) articles on graduate courses and research, written by pro-
fessors at various universities, and 2) ads placed by chemical engineering departments describ-
ing their graduate programs. Anyone interested in contributing to the editorial content of the 1988
fall issue should write to the editor, indicating the subject of the contribution and the tentative date
it can be submitted. Deadline is June 1st.





University of California
Davis, CA 95616

The Navier-Stokes equations

p [ t+ V-VV = - Vp + pg + V2 (1)

are exceedingly difficult to solve in their general form.
Thus there is great motivation to search for plausible
simplifications. One of these simplifications takes the
form: convective inertial effects are negligible. This
allows us to extract the linear version of Eq. (1) which
is given by

p- = - p + pg + iv (2)

One could express this simplification as an equation,
and there is some advantage in identifying it as a
Level I assumption and expressing the idea as

Level I:

pvYv = 0

This type of statement indicates precisely what is
being done in a mathematical sense, but it provides
no basis for the action. For an engineer, it is more
attractive to make a statement of the type: convective
inertial effects are small compared to viscous ef-
fects. This leads to a Level II restriction of the form
Level II: pv.7v << pV2V (4)
In writing inequalities of this type it is understood
that the comparison is being made between the abso,
lute values of the terms under consideration.
Equation (4) has very definite advantages over Eq.
(3) since a comment concerning the physics of the pro-
cess under consideration has been made. While Eq.
(4) tells the reader what must occur in order that Eq.
(2) be valid, it does not indicate, in terms of the pa-
rameters of the problem, when it will occur. In order
to determine this, one must be able to estimate the
magnitude of the terms in Eq. (4). The treatment here
� Copyright ChE Division ASEE 1988

Steve Whitaker received his undergraduate degree in chemical
engineering from the University of California at Berkeley and his PhD
from the University of Delaware. He is the author of three books: In-
troduction to Fluid Mechanics, Elementory Heat Transfer Analysis, and
Fundamental Principles of Heat Transfer, and he is the co-editor (with
Alberto Cassano) of Concepts and Design of Chemical Reactors. His
research deals with problems of multiphase transport phenomena, and
he has taught at U.C. Davis, Northwestern University, and the Univer-
sity of Houston.

will be brief since the details are given elsewhere [1].
We begin by expressing the velocity in terms of its
magnitude and a unit tangent vector
v = vX (5)
so that the convective inertial terms take the form
vVv = vX)Vv (6)
Since X is a unit tangent vector to a streamline, we
vv = v (7)
where s is the arclength measured along a streamline.
The derivative in Eq. (7) is estimated as [2, Sec. 2.9]
dv Av (8)
ds Lp

in which Av represents the change in v that occurs
along a streamline over the inertial length L,. Use of
Eq. (8) in Eq. (7) leads to an estimate of the convective
inertial terms given by


PV7v = 0(Pv (9)

It should be clear that a successful use of this estimate
requires a reasonably good knowledge of the flow
field. The viscous terms in Eq. (1) can be expressed as

v = 2 + av a2v (10)
ax2 ay2 3z2
and the associated order of magnitude is given by



Here Avix represents the change of v that occurs in
the x-direction over the distance Lx, and the meaning
of Avl, and AvIl is analogous for the y and z-directions.
We represent the largest of the three terms on the
right hand side of Eq. (11) as Av/L2 and our estimate
of the viscous terms takes the form

v2 = OA (12)

Here LP is referred to as the viscous length. For many
cases the value of Av in Eq. (12) is comparable to the
value in Eq. (9) and this allows us to substitute Eqs.
(9) and (12) into the inequality given by Eq. (4) in
order to obtain
v << 1 (13)

Traditionally the Reynolds number is defined in terms
of a length that is comparable to L,. Thus we use
Re = -p (14)

so that Eq. (13) takes the form

Level III: Re (j�<< 1 (15)

Obviously this Level III constraint has a great deal
more utility than the Level I assumption given by Eq.
(3) for it allows one to decide a priori whether the
analysis is applicable to a particular problem. When
simplifying the Navier-Stokes equations on the basis
of Eq. (15), one must remember Birkhoffs warning
concerning the plausible intuitive hypothesis that
"small causes produce small effects" [3].
While the route to Eq. (15) is straightforward, it
is important to keep in mind that it is a scalar con-
straint associated with the magnitude of vectors and
it must be used with care. In addition, it is crucial to
understand that Eq. (15) has nothing to do with di-

My thoughts concerning the various levels of
simplification began to develop several years ago,
and while the origin remains diffuse, I might place it
in the early stages of an undergraduate
heat transfer course.

mensional analysis, but is based entirely on the pro-
cess of estimating the derivatives of the velocity that
appear in Eq. (4). When the flow is turbulent, Eq. (1)
must be time-averaged and Eq. (15) then applies to
the time-averaged inertial and viscous terms. Es-
timating the Reynolds stress, pv'*Vv', is more difficult
than estimating p*.VV since a knowledge of the mag-
nitude of v' and the turbulent length scale is re-
Often it is difficult to develop Level III constraints
for complex problems (think about the "perfectly
mixed" stirred tank reactor), and one must settle for
the type of simplification indicated by Eq. (3) in order
to meet deadlines and complete required course mate-
rial. From my point of view, the clearly stated Level
I assumption is an acceptable simplification for it tells
you what is being done and it reminds you that Level
II restrictions and Level III constraints are waiting
to be found. In addition, it should remind you that the
analysis has an unspecified range of validity and that
experiments and further analysis are in order.

My thoughts concerning the various levels of
simplification began to develop several years ago, and
while the origin remains diffuse, I might place it in
the early stages of an undergraduate heat transfer
course. Because the subject under consideration was
heat conduction, I began a lecture with v = 0 and
quickly discarded radiant energy transport to arrive

P aT-
pc -


Since the assigned chapter and homework problems
dealt with steady, one-dimensional heat conduction,
we quickly moved to the following boundary value

�dxk[ ) (17)


T=To x =
T = T x=L

With the comment that "we can treat the thermal con-
ductivity as constant," I was on the verge of present-


v2 = 0 -x L

ing the classical result given by

T = + (Tr1- T (20)

However, there was a flaw in my development. The
title of the chapter under consideration indicated that
we were to study the subject of steady, one-dimen-
sional heat conduction, but it said nothing about the
thermal conductivity being constant. One of the sages
from the back row spotted the opening, and the trad-
itional train of events was disrupted by the observa-
tion that "nothing is truly constant." Delighted to find
that a portion of the back row was awake, I pursued
Eq. (17) a bit further to arrive at

0-- = d + I k (d 2 (21)
Cdx2J k dx)
Since nonlinearities can be eliminated with impunity
in an undergraduate class, I was willing to asume that
ak/aT was zero and move on to the desired result
given by Eq. (20). However, the back row was warm-
ing to the task, and one of its occupants persisted
with, "But nothing is really zero is it?" A reviewer of
this article suggested that I should have counter-
attacked with the Kirchhoff transformation [4, Sec.
2.16] so that Eqs. (17) through (19) could be expressed

0 = -

from the tradition. Students who are tempted to ques-
tion the existence of the perfectly mixed stirred tank
reactor are afraid that the instructor might plunge
into a discourse on viscous dissipation, the Kol-
mogoroff length scale, and Damk6hler numbers.* The
terms of the treaty between students and faculty have
been hammered out over the years, and by and large
they work reasonably well. For example, can you im-
agine the difficulties of a study of fluid statics if it
were preceded by the Level III constraints associated
P- << pg , pV'VV << pg , ~2V << pg (26)

It is better to have a chapter entitled "Fluid Statics"
so that the deck is cleared for an exploration of the
pressure fields and forces associated with

0 = - Vp + pg

Still, the question was posed from the back row,
and it deserved an answer. Furthermore, it seemed
to me that Eqs. (22) through (25) were most certainly
not the answer, for the question was, in reality: How
can you justify the simplification of Eq. (21) to arrive

0 =

(22) Clearly the second term in Eq. (21) cannot be neg-
lected on the basis of

B.C. 1:
B.C. 2:

U=0 , x= 0
U =U , x= L

Here the transformed temperature is given by
U= k(11) dn (25)
in which ko is the thermal conductivity at the temper-
ature To. This approach would have avoided making
the assumption that k was constant, but it would have
delayed our arrival at Eq. (20) and the physical insight
that can be gained from that result. While Eqs. (22)
through (25) can provide an "exact" solution to the
problem posed by Eqs. (17) through (19), we usually
seek "approximate" solutions and often the approxi-
mations that we make are forced on our students by
the title of the chapter and the name of the textbook.
In engineering education there is a conspiracy
among students and faculty to base their assumptions
on the title of the chapter currently under considera-
tion. It is a game that is played with well established
rules and most often both parties are loath to depart

1 3k dT) �<< d2T
kaTJ d J dx2


but surely conditions must exist for which the vari-
ation of the thermal conductivity is "small enough" so
that Eq. (21) could be replaced by Eq. (28). This raises
the question of "small relative to what?" and the fol-
lowing problem was devised to explore this question
and to help students understand what is meant by

We consider the boundary value problem given by

pc f) = k (a- + (k W (30)
p? F5 Ti .3X2. F [T xJ FaX J

I.C T = Ti , t = 0
B.C. 1: T = T. + (T - T )g(t) , x = 0

B.C. 2:

T = T , x=L

*It is bad enough that the material would not be available in the
text, but what is worse is that it would not be covered on the final!


along with a second integration leads to

g(t)= 0 , t = 0
g(t) = 1 , t = t*


The classic test piece in a study of separation of vari-
ables is associated with t* -> 0+ and (ak/aT) -> 0, but
in this case we should simply think of t* as some
characteristic time associated with the boundary con-
dition at x = 0. Everyone knows that if t* is "large
enough" and if the variation of k with T is "small
enough," the solution to this boundary value problem
will yield the linear temperature profiles associated
with Eq. (28). The Level I assumptions related to
these conditions are

Level Ia:

Level Ib:



(DT)= 0

(- =

and one should be careful to identify the first of these
as the quasi-steady assumption.
Our objective at this point is to develop the Level
II and Level III restrictions and constraints that are
associated with Eqs. (35a,b). Thus we seek to deter-
mine what is "large enough" and what is "small
enough." If you have an idea that a satisfactory solu-
tion to Eqs. (30) through (34) might be given by*

T = T + (To - T1)g(t) 1 - ( (36)

the possibility can be explored by decomposing the
temperature into the result represented by Eq. (36)
and whatever else is left. One method of doing this is
to arrange Eq. (30) as

aT2 1 f aT2
TX2 - a FtJ k J 3xj


and to form the indefinite integral in order to obtain

aaT = r lo -T 1 rk T2 d (38)

x = o

Use of the definition

o = T 1 ak) (T2 (39)
S- atat k[aTJ [a (39)

*This solution is obtained by using Eqs. (35a,b) to reduce Eq. (30)
to the form given by Eq. (28). When Eq. (28) is solved subject to
Eqs. (32) and (33), the solution given by Eq. (36) results.

T(x,t) = T =

(aT) + F
+ x=O j + 0 d
Tn=o �=o

The boundary conditions given by Eqs. (32) and (33)
can be used to evaluate the two constants in Eq. (40)
and the general solution is given by

T(x,t) = T1 + (To - T)g(t) 1 - !]

+ 'nddn - -) nd=gd
n=o 0 =o T-=0 �=o

One should keep in mind that this is an exact rep-
resentation for the temperature, but it is only useful
when the integrals are negligible. The integrals in Eq.
(41) can be estimated as

=x =nr 2
1nddn = 0() �-
1=o 0=o

ndtdn = O(Q) -
n=o 0 =o



and use of these estimates in Eq. (41) leads to

T(x,t) = T + (To - T)g(t) 1 - (3j

+L 1 - ( 0() (43)

We are now in a position to state that the solution for
T(x,t) is qiven by

T(xt) = T + (T - T)g(t) 1 - [J1 (44)

provided that the following inequality is satisfied

S- L)g(t) 2
(TO - T )g(t) >> �--0(9)

This result allows us to replace the Level I assump-
tions given by Eqs. (35a,b) with the following Level
II restrictions


Here g(t) is a function such that

Level IIa: (To - T)g(t) > 0 (lt (46a)

L .2 fak)_ 3T .T 2
Level IIb: (T - T)g(t) >> 0 k- T J (46b)

Here we are beginning to see how "long" one must
wait before the solution becomes quasi-steady, and
how "small" the variation of the thermal conductivity
must be in order that the last term in Eq. (30) can be
In order to proceed further, we must be willing to
estimate the derivatives that appear in Eqs. (46a,b),
and in this development we will be satisfied with the
rather crude estimates given by [2, Sec. 2.9].
T I o TL (T - T )g(t) t*
aT = x=L -(To 1*
-- = 0 = 0 t , t t

aT I 0 =-T x= = 0 L (47b)
ax L L

This aspect of the problem could be considered more
carefully by introducing the thermal boundary layer
thickness; however, we are interested in knowing
under what circumstances Eq. (44) is valid and the
estimates given by Eqs. (47a,b) are consistent with
that objective. When Eqs. (47a,b) are used in Eqs.
(46a,b) we obtain the Level III constraints given by

Level liIa: - >> 1 t , t (48a)
Level IIIb: ktaJ(To - Tl)g(t) < 1 (48b)

The first of these clearly indicates that the process
will be quasi-steady when t* is large compared to
L2/a and an exact solution of the boundary value prob-
lem will indicate that this is a conservative constraint.
Since g(t) has an upperbound of one, Eq. (48b) can be
replaced by

Level IIIb: _k To - T1) << 1 (48c)

While the results given by Eqs. (48a,b,c) are some-
thing that "everyone knows," not everyone knows
how to arrive at these constraints without solving the
full boundary value problem and exploring special
cases. In addition, the identification of various levels
of simplification is an important concept to bring to
the attention of students, for it allows us to move
quickly to certain simple engineering solutions while

reminding us of our obligation to be more thorough
when time permits or necessity demands. Following
up on our obligations is sometimes easy to do. For
example, in the typical heat transfer course transient
processes are always studied, and when exact solu-
tions are available it is easy to remind students of
prior constraints that were developed on the basis of
order of magnitude analysis. In the study of transient
heat conduction in a flat plate one finds that Eq. (48a)
can be replaced with at/L2 - 1, thus providing a clear
indication that the original estimation was overly se-
vere. To support the result given by Eq. (48c), a
homework problem associated with Eqs. (22) through
(25) does rather nicely. The process of following order
of magnitude estimates with exact solutions is an at-
tractive method of encouraging students to develop
their own assumptions, restrictions and constraints.
As they gain confidence in this process, chapter titles
become guidelines for the voyage rather than con-
straints for the next exam.
1. Whitaker, S., 1982, "The laws of continuum physics for single-
phase, single-component systems," Chapter 1.1 in Handbook of
Multiphase Systems, edited by G. Hetsroni, Hemisphere Pub.
Co., New York.
2. Whitaker, S., 1983, Fundatmental Principles of Heat Trans-
fer, R. E. Krieger Pub. Co., Malabar, Florida.
3. Birkhoff, G., 1960, Hydrodynamics, A Study in Logic, Fact,
and Similitude, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
4. Carslaw, H. S., and J. C. Jaeger, 1959, Conduction of Heat in
Solids, Oxford Press, London. O

books received
Gaseous Detonations: Their Nature, Effects and Control, by
M.A. Nettleton. Chapman & Hall, Methuen, Inc., 29 West
35th St., New York, NY 10001; (1987) 255 pages, $72
Radiation and Combined Heat Transfer in Channels, by M.
Tamonis (edited by Zukauskas and Karni). Hemisphere Pub-
lishing Co., 79 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10016; (1987) 239
pages, $69.95
Particulate and Multiphase Processes: Vol. 1, General Partic-
ulate Phenomena; Vol. 2, Contamination Analysis and Con-
trol; Vol. 3, Colloidal and Interfacial Phenomena, by Ariman
and Veziroglu; Hemisphere Publishing Corp., 79 Madison
Ave., New York, NY 10016 (1987); 932; 760; 544 pages, $133;
Batch Process Automation: Theory and Practice, by Howard
P. Rosenof and Asish Ghosh. Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 115
Fifth Ave., New York, NY 10003 (1987); 336 pages
Vapor Cloud Dispersion Models, by Steven R. Hanna and
Peter J. Drivas. AIChE, 345 East 47 St., New York, NY 10017
(1987); 177 pages, $40 members, $75 others
Handbook of Thermodynamic High Temperature Process
Data, by A.L. Suris. Hemisphere Publishing Co., 79 Madison
Ave., New York, NY 10016 (1987); 601 pages, $139.95



Departmental Sponsors

The following 156 departments contributed to the support of CEE in 1988 with bulk subscriptions.

University of Akron
University of Alabama
University of Alberta
University of Arizona
Arizona State University
University of Arkansas
Auburn University
Brigham Young University
University of British Columbia
Brown University
Bucknell University
University of Calgary
California Institute of Technology
California State Polytechnic University
California State University, Long Beach
University of California (Berkeley)
University of California (Davis).
University of California (Los Angeles)
University of California (Santa Barbara)
University of California at San Diego
Carnegie-Mellon University
Case-Western Reserve University
University of Cincinnati
Clarkson University
Clemson University
Cleveland State University
University of Colorado
Colorado School of Mines
Colorado State University
Columbia University
University of Connecticut
Cooper Union
Cornell University
Dartmouth College
University of Dayton
University of Delaware
Drexel University
University of Florida
Florida State University
Florida Institute of Technology
Georgia Institute of Technology
University of Houston
Howard University
University of Idaho
University of Illinois (Chicago)
University of Illinois (Urbana)
Illinois Institute of Technology
University of Iowa
Iowa State University
Johns Hopkins University
University of Kansas
Kansas State University

University of Kentucky
Lafayette College
Lakehead University
Lamar University
Laval University
Lehigh University
Loughborough University of Technology
Louisiana State University
Louisiana Technical University
University of Louisville
University of Lowell
University of Maine
Manhattan College
University of Maryland
University of Massachusetts
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
McGill University
McMaster University
McNeese State University
University of Michigan
Michigan State University
Michigan Technical University
University of Minnesota
University of Missouri (Columbia)
University of Missouri (Rolla)
Monash University
Montana State University
University of Nebraska
University of New Hampshire
New Jersey Institute of Tech.
University of New Mexico
New Mexico State University
University of New South Wales
City University of New York
Polytechnic Institute of New York
State University of N.Y. at Buffalo
North Carolina A&T State University
North Carolina State University
University of North Dakota
Northeastern University
Northwestern University
University of Notre Dame
Nova Scotia Technical College
Ohio State University
Ohio University
University of Oklahoma
Oklahoma State University
Oregon State University
University of Ottawa
University of Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania State University
University of Pittsburgh

Princeton University
Purdue University
Queen's University
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
University of Rhode Island
Rice University
University of Rochester
Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Rutgers University
University of Saskatchewan
University of South Alabama
University of South Carolina
South Dakota School of Mines
University of South Florida
University of Southern California
University of Southwestern Louisiana
Stanford University
Stevens Institute of Technology
University of Sydney
Syracuse University
Tennessee Technological University
University of Tennessee
Texas A&M University
University of Texas at Austin
Texas Technological University
University of Toledo
Tri-State University
Tufts University
Tulane University
University of Tulsa
Tuskegee Institute
University of Utah
Vanderbilt University
Villanova University
University of Virginia
Virginia Polytechnic Institute
Washington State University
University of Washington
Washington University
University of Waterloo
Wayne State University
West Virginia College of Grad Studies
West Virginia Institute Technology
West Virginia University
University of Western Ontario
Widener University
University of Windsor
University of Wisconsin (Madison)
Worcester Polytechnic Institute
University of Wyoming
Yale University
Youngstown State University

If your department is not a contributor, write to CHEMICAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION,
c/o Chemical Engineering Dept., University of Florida, Gainesville FL 32611, for information on bulk subscriptions.


Union Carbide

Union Carbide Corporation is one of the nation's major
industrial companies. We employ more than 50,000
people at 700 plants and facilities in 37 countries, and
market our products in about 130 countries.

Over the past few years, we have become a more
streamlined, simplified and focused organization,
structured to respond effectively to rapidly changing
economic and market conditions.

for Success

Our principal businesses include chemicals and plastics,
industrial gases, and carbon products.

Union Carbide is one of the world's leading producers
of ethylene oxide/glycol and polyethylene. We have
the widest range of solvents of any U.S. chemical
company and are the largest domestic supplier of
industrial gases. We're also the world's largest producer
of carbon and graphite electrodes for steel-making.

A.- 3


Department of

39 Old

Danbury, CT

An Equal


University of Florida Home Page
© 2004 - 2011 University of Florida George A. Smathers Libraries.
All rights reserved.

Acceptable Use, Copyright, and Disclaimer Statement
Last updated May 24, 2011 - - mvs